<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motorola Q: $349 full price, but only $158 to make</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_349_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_349_/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_349_/#comment-46220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/motorola_q_349_#comment-46220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Well, the $158 seems to be the cost of the hardware components.  It does not, however, include other costs such as the Windows Mobile license.  It doesn&#039;t make sense to me to not include them in the cost of the device, unless Business Week somehow thinks that Motorola is pirating the software ;-)
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the $158 seems to be the cost of the hardware components.  It does not, however, include other costs such as the Windows Mobile license.  It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me to not include them in the cost of the device, unless Business Week somehow thinks that Motorola is pirating the software ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bancroft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/motorola_q_349_/#comment-46221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Bancroft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/21/motorola_q_349_#comment-46221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, full price on the Moto Q from Verizon is $419, which is what they insisted on charging me, a customer eight months into a contract, paying over $100/month, and ready to extend my contract by two years. 

No discounts for you, or me! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, full price on the Moto Q from Verizon is $419, which is what they insisted on charging me, a customer eight months into a contract, paying over $100/month, and ready to extend my contract by two years. </p>
<p>No discounts for you, or me! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

