<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MobileTechRoudup is #62 on Podcast Alley!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Paine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch out for direct Europeans. There&#039;s more of them here. I&#039;ll take the &#039;Gartner&#039; comment as a compliment although i&#039;m not sure why you think that! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OK i&#039;m off to listen and learn. As I said i&#039;ve already got some notes written about the iPod/touch browser that i&#039;m happy to post. I&#039;ll put James&#039; thoughts and mine together so that people can see what we think. Feel free to get some discussion going. Its always worthwhile ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Watch out for direct Europeans. There&#8217;s more of them here. I&#8217;ll take the &#8216;Gartner&#8217; comment as a compliment although i&#8217;m not sure why you think that! </p>
<p>OK i&#8217;m off to listen and learn. As I said i&#8217;ve already got some notes written about the iPod/touch browser that i&#8217;m happy to post. I&#8217;ll put James&#8217; thoughts and mine together so that people can see what we think. Feel free to get some discussion going. Its always worthwhile ;-)</p>
<p>S.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Sorry Steve, it sounded more like you were writing a white paper for Gartner rather than having a conversation. ;) Anyway, I think James covered what you&#039;re looking for in the iPod Touch overview video he did on 11/16. The last five minutes of the video explains why he likes it.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Sorry Steve, it sounded more like you were writing a white paper for Gartner rather than having a conversation. ;) Anyway, I think James covered what you&#8217;re looking for in the iPod Touch overview video he did on 11/16. The last five minutes of the video explains why he likes it.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Paine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kevin. Don&#039;t you start on me too. What is this? Kill Chippy day. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no problem with James personal opinion. Its clear from my questions surely.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is simply a query and a good opportunity to expand on &#039;why&#039; James thought it was his best mobile browsing experience. I wanted to hear the context. We can all learn from it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I happen to think the iPhone is the best consumer internet browsing device ever and i&#039;m happy to explain why but James, come on. I thinks its interesting. You think its interesting. Many other people think its interesting and many other people would probably love to hear WHY YOU think its interesting. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;isn&#039;t it up to consumers to decide what&#039;s best for them? &quot; Yes, but they look to people like James for feedback. Me too. There&#039;s lots to learn in this segment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;I don&#039;t need an 800 x 480 screen on a pocketable device that I carry everywhere. In fact, I use the web on my iPhone more hours per day than on any other device I carry.&quot; Thats more like it. Thats exactly the sort of feedback I was looking for. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shall we start from the top again James?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;James - why do you think its the best mobile browsing device ever?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Steve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin. Don&#8217;t you start on me too. What is this? Kill Chippy day. ;-)</p>
<p>I have no problem with James personal opinion. Its clear from my questions surely.</p>
<p>This is simply a query and a good opportunity to expand on &#8216;why&#8217; James thought it was his best mobile browsing experience. I wanted to hear the context. We can all learn from it. </p>
<p>I happen to think the iPhone is the best consumer internet browsing device ever and i&#8217;m happy to explain why but James, come on. I thinks its interesting. You think its interesting. Many other people think its interesting and many other people would probably love to hear WHY YOU think its interesting. </p>
<p>&#8220;isn&#8217;t it up to consumers to decide what&#8217;s best for them? &#8221; Yes, but they look to people like James for feedback. Me too. There&#8217;s lots to learn in this segment.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t need an 800 x 480 screen on a pocketable device that I carry everywhere. In fact, I use the web on my iPhone more hours per day than on any other device I carry.&#8221; Thats more like it. Thats exactly the sort of feedback I was looking for. </p>
<p>Shall we start from the top again James?</p>
<p>James &#8211; why do you think its the best mobile browsing device ever?</p>
<p>Steve.
</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Chippy, chill out dude.  Kevin said what I&#039;ve been trying to say and done so quite well.  The iPod Touch browsing works well for me and I don&#039;t see any need to defend it.  The features you mentioned that the iPod Touch lacks are obviously important to you but not to me since I stand by my statement that the browsing experience I get on the iPod Touch is the best mobile browsing experience on any device.  For me.  My opinion. I just don&#039;t see I need to defend that opinion as I&#039;ve said more than once why I feel that way. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Chippy, chill out dude.  Kevin said what I&#8217;ve been trying to say and done so quite well.  The iPod Touch browsing works well for me and I don&#8217;t see any need to defend it.  The features you mentioned that the iPod Touch lacks are obviously important to you but not to me since I stand by my statement that the browsing experience I get on the iPod Touch is the best mobile browsing experience on any device.  For me.  My opinion. I just don&#8217;t see I need to defend that opinion as I&#8217;ve said more than once why I feel that way. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Steve, I think you&#039;re inadvertently missing something here. As you quoted from James he said the iPod Touch provides him with &quot;The best browsing experience i&#039;ve ever had on a mobile device. Of any kind&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s his opinion based on his personal experience. While I agree with some of your criticisms, note that he&#039;s not individually critiquing each hardware or software feature as you&#039;ve done. He&#039;s talking about &quot;the browsing experience&quot; in his usage. It&#039;s not the perfect solution for everyone but it&#039;s an excellent one for him and neither you, nor I could say that he&#039;s unequivocally wrong. It would be far too presumptuous of us (or any site really) to tell people what&#039;s best for them by providing a list of what we think is missing as you&#039;ve done. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No qualms about the list as it&#039;s factually correct, but isn&#039;t it up to consumers to decide what&#039;s best for them? Example, in your list: &quot;Needs to be 800 x 480&quot;. For who and why? I don&#039;t need an 800 x 480 screen on a pocketable device that I carry everywhere. In fact, I use the web on my iPhone more hours per day than on any other device I carry. Does that make me &quot;wrong&quot;? Of course not. By the same token, I&#039;d never suggest that someone abandon their personal user requirements and buy a device that suits mine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With all due respect, let&#039;s focus on what was said here in terms of one person&#039;s opinion while realizing that&#039;s what it is: one person&#039;s opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Steve, I think you&#8217;re inadvertently missing something here. As you quoted from James he said the iPod Touch provides him with &#8220;The best browsing experience i&#8217;ve ever had on a mobile device. Of any kind&#8221;. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s his opinion based on his personal experience. While I agree with some of your criticisms, note that he&#8217;s not individually critiquing each hardware or software feature as you&#8217;ve done. He&#8217;s talking about &#8220;the browsing experience&#8221; in his usage. It&#8217;s not the perfect solution for everyone but it&#8217;s an excellent one for him and neither you, nor I could say that he&#8217;s unequivocally wrong. It would be far too presumptuous of us (or any site really) to tell people what&#8217;s best for them by providing a list of what we think is missing as you&#8217;ve done. </p>
<p>No qualms about the list as it&#8217;s factually correct, but isn&#8217;t it up to consumers to decide what&#8217;s best for them? Example, in your list: &#8220;Needs to be 800 x 480&#8243;. For who and why? I don&#8217;t need an 800 x 480 screen on a pocketable device that I carry everywhere. In fact, I use the web on my iPhone more hours per day than on any other device I carry. Does that make me &#8220;wrong&#8221;? Of course not. By the same token, I&#8217;d never suggest that someone abandon their personal user requirements and buy a device that suits mine.</p>
<p>With all due respect, let&#8217;s focus on what was said here in terms of one person&#8217;s opinion while realizing that&#8217;s what it is: one person&#8217;s opinion.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Paine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wow James. I didnt expect that response from you. &lt;br /&gt;
I was just asking for clarification and not attacking your opinion as I said in my previous post.&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like this conversation has ended.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Steve.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wow James. I didnt expect that response from you. <br />
I was just asking for clarification and not attacking your opinion as I said in my previous post.<br />
Looks like this conversation has ended.</p>
<p>Steve.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Steve, my statement is my opinion and is not intended to replace anyone else&#039;s so a discussion is pointless.  We always make it clear here on jkOTR that everyone&#039;s needs and desires are individual and I would never try to convince you that my favorite solution is better than yours.  I have stated more than once why I like the mobile browsing experience of the iPod Touch and since it&#039;s my opinion I feel no desire to defend it.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Steve, my statement is my opinion and is not intended to replace anyone else&#8217;s so a discussion is pointless.  We always make it clear here on jkOTR that everyone&#8217;s needs and desires are individual and I would never try to convince you that my favorite solution is better than yours.  I have stated more than once why I like the mobile browsing experience of the iPod Touch and since it&#8217;s my opinion I feel no desire to defend it.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Paine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;No i&#039;m not really trying to split hairs. I&#039;m not trying to challenge your opinion either. I&#039;m just trying to quality what you broadcast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#039;Best mobile browsing device ever&#039; is a bold claim and I wanted to see why you thought so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think there&#039;s a lot of factors to take into consideration based on speed, size, mobility, capability. I wanted to learn exactly what angle you were coming from.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like the ipod touch (actually i&#039;ve only used the iphone browser but I think the iPod is a better consumer device) and I think it fits perfectly with many consumer requirements but for advanced use, it falls over very quickly. &lt;br /&gt;
I have already noted down a number of issues with the browser that advanced users should consider.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- No mobile connectivity. (3G)&lt;br /&gt;
- Locked filesystem. I couldn&#039;t even save an image. I couldn&#039;t bluetooth and image. I couldn&#039;t connect via USB and transfer an image. This is a new definition of walled-garden! &lt;br /&gt;
- Its faster than many smartphones but not the N800. Still fasr slower than handtop pcs.&lt;br /&gt;
- Zooming in and out with fingers is tiresome and inneficient. The screen size is simply too small. Needs to be 800x480.&lt;br /&gt;
- Keyboard input is slow. (i couldn&#039;t get a landscape keyboard  either. Not sure if thats me doing something wrong tho.)&lt;br /&gt;
- Cut and paste. Forget it. &lt;br /&gt;
- Having to go to alternative apps for some parts of the Internet. (maps, youtube) slows down the experience (but improves it in some respects admittedly) &lt;br /&gt;
- No plugins. &lt;br /&gt;
- No flash.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you have time i&#039;d love to see a post from you about it. I&#039;m happy to follow up so we get a nice discussion going. I think its important.  I will be writing something about the browser in Carrypad soon anyway as I have a couple of videos I want to post.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;
Stevge. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>No i&#8217;m not really trying to split hairs. I&#8217;m not trying to challenge your opinion either. I&#8217;m just trying to quality what you broadcast.</p>
<p>&#8216;Best mobile browsing device ever&#8217; is a bold claim and I wanted to see why you thought so.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a lot of factors to take into consideration based on speed, size, mobility, capability. I wanted to learn exactly what angle you were coming from.</p>
<p>I like the ipod touch (actually i&#8217;ve only used the iphone browser but I think the iPod is a better consumer device) and I think it fits perfectly with many consumer requirements but for advanced use, it falls over very quickly. <br />
I have already noted down a number of issues with the browser that advanced users should consider.</p>
<p>- No mobile connectivity. (3G)<br />
- Locked filesystem. I couldn&#8217;t even save an image. I couldn&#8217;t bluetooth and image. I couldn&#8217;t connect via USB and transfer an image. This is a new definition of walled-garden! <br />
- Its faster than many smartphones but not the N800. Still fasr slower than handtop pcs.<br />
- Zooming in and out with fingers is tiresome and inneficient. The screen size is simply too small. Needs to be 800&#215;480.<br />
- Keyboard input is slow. (i couldn&#8217;t get a landscape keyboard  either. Not sure if thats me doing something wrong tho.)<br />
- Cut and paste. Forget it. <br />
- Having to go to alternative apps for some parts of the Internet. (maps, youtube) slows down the experience (but improves it in some respects admittedly) <br />
- No plugins. <br />
- No flash.</p>
<p>If you have time i&#8217;d love to see a post from you about it. I&#8217;m happy to follow up so we get a nice discussion going. I think its important.  I will be writing something about the browser in Carrypad soon anyway as I have a couple of videos I want to post.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Stevge. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Steve, to me if it offers the best mobile browsing experience then it is the best mobile browsing device.  You are trying to split hairs here.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Steve, to me if it offers the best mobile browsing experience then it is the best mobile browsing device.  You are trying to split hairs here.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Paine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mobiletechroudu/#comment-397312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/mobiletechroudu#comment-397312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;So it is not the best mobile browser device? Its just the most usable?. I agree if thats the case.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe you should make it clear to people what you mean by the &#039;best mobile browsing device&#039; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>So it is not the best mobile browser device? Its just the most usable?. I agree if thats the case.</p>
<p>Maybe you should make it clear to people what you mean by the &#8216;best mobile browsing device&#8217; </p>
<p>S.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

