<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac hard drive upgrade: faster and uses less power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/mac_hard_drive_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mac_hard_drive_/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt french</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/mac_hard_drive_/#comment-405528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[walt french]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/04/13/mac_hard_drive_#comment-405528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The higher-capacity drives ought to be faster even at the same rotational speed because more data passes under the heads each millisecond. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Moving from say, a 120 GB drive up to a 240GB drive ought to give 2X the data rate if the extra capacity was achieved by extra platter(s) in the drive, or 40% higher rate if it was a simple density increase, such as from the perpendicular technology now showing up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Obviously, going up to 7200 from 4200 is also a big -- approx 70% -- gain, but there are other advances at play, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The higher-capacity drives ought to be faster even at the same rotational speed because more data passes under the heads each millisecond. </p>
<p>Moving from say, a 120 GB drive up to a 240GB drive ought to give 2X the data rate if the extra capacity was achieved by extra platter(s) in the drive, or 40% higher rate if it was a simple density increase, such as from the perpendicular technology now showing up.</p>
<p>Obviously, going up to 7200 from 4200 is also a big &#8212; approx 70% &#8212; gain, but there are other advances at play, too.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

