<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindle&#8217;s WhisperNet Gets a Conventional Pricing Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Isaac</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/#comment-417115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Isaac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=34849#comment-417115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before we rush too far into thinking Amazon will discontinue whispernet or charge monthy for existing owners, consider. Sprint has to compete with AT&amp;T in the device market. AT&amp;T has iPhone, sprint now has Kindle showcasing their service. 

The bandwidth used by Kindles is minimal. And anyone who has browses with it&#039;s experimental browser likely will agree it isn&#039;t an oft used function. My guess is Amazon got whispernet for a few bucks per device sold. .15 cents per convert/download more than covers the cost of 1 MB transfer. 

Now my Kindle conspiracy theory is in another year or two they&#039;ll dramatically increase the price of books.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we rush too far into thinking Amazon will discontinue whispernet or charge monthy for existing owners, consider. Sprint has to compete with AT&amp;T in the device market. AT&amp;T has iPhone, sprint now has Kindle showcasing their service. </p>
<p>The bandwidth used by Kindles is minimal. And anyone who has browses with it&#8217;s experimental browser likely will agree it isn&#8217;t an oft used function. My guess is Amazon got whispernet for a few bucks per device sold. .15 cents per convert/download more than covers the cost of 1 MB transfer. </p>
<p>Now my Kindle conspiracy theory is in another year or two they&#8217;ll dramatically increase the price of books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/#comment-417114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Zatz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=34849#comment-417114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doubt you&#039;ll get the details. I know how we did things at Dash (which was not Sprint), who knows if Amazon/Sprint worked out a similar arrangement. Though I&#039;m probably prohibited from sharing. Like you and James, I wonder at the motivation - perhaps it&#039;s to prevent or limit people from uploading other (open) ebook formats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doubt you&#8217;ll get the details. I know how we did things at Dash (which was not Sprint), who knows if Amazon/Sprint worked out a similar arrangement. Though I&#8217;m probably prohibited from sharing. Like you and James, I wonder at the motivation &#8211; perhaps it&#8217;s to prevent or limit people from uploading other (open) ebook formats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/#comment-417113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=34849#comment-417113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the end of Kindle! 

I&#039;m sure this is just the first step in the transition to a subscription model for the Whispernet service. Soon enough, every Kindle user will have a monthly charge for the service like mobile phones. I saw this coming from day 1. Lifetime wireless service + device for $359? Too good to be true...

All they&#039;ve done is open themselves up to lose the battle against the rumored &quot;iPad&quot; from Apple which will do everything the Kindle does as well as be a substitute for a netbook. 

Maybe that was Bezo&#039;s plan all along - &quot;Kindle&quot; may transition to a service/app you install on other devices and still require a monthly subscription. The actual harware reader may have been a means to an end and in the long run not the core piece of the business model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the end of Kindle! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure this is just the first step in the transition to a subscription model for the Whispernet service. Soon enough, every Kindle user will have a monthly charge for the service like mobile phones. I saw this coming from day 1. Lifetime wireless service + device for $359? Too good to be true&#8230;</p>
<p>All they&#8217;ve done is open themselves up to lose the battle against the rumored &#8220;iPad&#8221; from Apple which will do everything the Kindle does as well as be a substitute for a netbook. </p>
<p>Maybe that was Bezo&#8217;s plan all along &#8211; &#8220;Kindle&#8221; may transition to a service/app you install on other devices and still require a monthly subscription. The actual harware reader may have been a means to an end and in the long run not the core piece of the business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom J</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/#comment-417112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=34849#comment-417112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I expect Amazon thought people would send short emails, and instead they&#039;re sending books and very long business and government reports.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect Amazon thought people would send short emails, and instead they&#8217;re sending books and very long business and government reports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/#comment-417111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=34849#comment-417111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lame, but whatever, since i don&#039;t have a kindle, and couldn&#039;t use whispernet from japan anyway.

by the way, i wish kindle would get rid of the stupid keyboard and make the screen the entire surface of the device. and then touchscreen with a virtual keyboard. basically, like the sony reader, but with wireless, and supporting amazon&#039;s books. only, i wish amazon would use epub instead of their own stupid proprietary format.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lame, but whatever, since i don&#8217;t have a kindle, and couldn&#8217;t use whispernet from japan anyway.</p>
<p>by the way, i wish kindle would get rid of the stupid keyboard and make the screen the entire surface of the device. and then touchscreen with a virtual keyboard. basically, like the sony reader, but with wireless, and supporting amazon&#8217;s books. only, i wish amazon would use epub instead of their own stupid proprietary format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/kindles-whispernet-gets-a-conventional-pricing-model/#comment-417110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=34849#comment-417110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It seems that Amazon must be paying a lot to Sprint for these transfers and they now need to make the users pay.&quot;

Could be. Or Amazon is trying to generate additional revenue for themselves. Perhaps they didn&#039;t figure many people would use this service but it is getting used quite a bit and therefore an opportunity they initially overlooked. It would really be interesting to know the details of the agreement for Sprint&#039;s services. Maybe there&#039;s some breakdown or hints in the financial statements of one or both of these companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems that Amazon must be paying a lot to Sprint for these transfers and they now need to make the users pay.&#8221;</p>
<p>Could be. Or Amazon is trying to generate additional revenue for themselves. Perhaps they didn&#8217;t figure many people would use this service but it is getting used quite a bit and therefore an opportunity they initially overlooked. It would really be interesting to know the details of the agreement for Sprint&#8217;s services. Maybe there&#8217;s some breakdown or hints in the financial statements of one or both of these companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

