<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3.0 preview next week at Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scotty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ve already seen the stories about multi-core ARM CPU&#039;s for the next iPhone. So to me that means iPhone 3.0 will be built on Mac OS X 10.6 with Grand Central which I think also hints at multiple stream processors for 3D operations as well.

But that&#039;s the easy stuff to predict for March 17. :-)

The other thing I see is the need to shrink the chip count to make a smaller board to allow for more heat dissipation and a larger battery. So I&#039;ll bet that PA Semi has been busy creating a 3G processor to replace the existing 3G baseband chip in the iPhone 3G. I&#039;m also betting that since the existing 3G chip has an ARM in it that PA Semi is adding the 3G &quot;data pump&quot; as a &quot;co-processor&quot; to the multi-core ARM CPU they&#039;re designing. Apple will still tap Samsung for their proven low power chip fab and multi-chip packaging expertise.

To prevent cracking I&#039;ll also go out on a limb and say Apple will build the bootloader into the CPU package. Either a chunk of FLASH fabbed into the CPU die or a small FLASH packed in by Samsung along with the double capacity SDRAM.

This platform will be powerful enough to drive a 10&quot; display as well. And it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if Apple didn&#039;t ship the 10&quot; &quot;whatever&quot; prior to the iPhone 3.0 to work out kinks in the new platform prior to squeezing it into the iPhone&#039;s smaller denser package.

Apple will also have been busy having PA Semi fix up the A2DP problem. Much like the Sony Vaio P the next platform will have a dedicated A2DP solution to beat the power problem.

This will of course necessitate that Apple produce something akin to Sony&#039;s HBH-IS800. Which I suspect they&#039;ve had for a couple years now but didn&#039;t have what they felt was a low power enough solution in the phone to release it (e.g. no new development, its already in the can)

Copy n&#039; paste? Who knows but if they deliver all the above I won&#039;t miss it. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve already seen the stories about multi-core ARM CPU&#8217;s for the next iPhone. So to me that means iPhone 3.0 will be built on Mac OS X 10.6 with Grand Central which I think also hints at multiple stream processors for 3D operations as well.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the easy stuff to predict for March 17. :-)</p>
<p>The other thing I see is the need to shrink the chip count to make a smaller board to allow for more heat dissipation and a larger battery. So I&#8217;ll bet that PA Semi has been busy creating a 3G processor to replace the existing 3G baseband chip in the iPhone 3G. I&#8217;m also betting that since the existing 3G chip has an ARM in it that PA Semi is adding the 3G &#8220;data pump&#8221; as a &#8220;co-processor&#8221; to the multi-core ARM CPU they&#8217;re designing. Apple will still tap Samsung for their proven low power chip fab and multi-chip packaging expertise.</p>
<p>To prevent cracking I&#8217;ll also go out on a limb and say Apple will build the bootloader into the CPU package. Either a chunk of FLASH fabbed into the CPU die or a small FLASH packed in by Samsung along with the double capacity SDRAM.</p>
<p>This platform will be powerful enough to drive a 10&#8243; display as well. And it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if Apple didn&#8217;t ship the 10&#8243; &#8220;whatever&#8221; prior to the iPhone 3.0 to work out kinks in the new platform prior to squeezing it into the iPhone&#8217;s smaller denser package.</p>
<p>Apple will also have been busy having PA Semi fix up the A2DP problem. Much like the Sony Vaio P the next platform will have a dedicated A2DP solution to beat the power problem.</p>
<p>This will of course necessitate that Apple produce something akin to Sony&#8217;s HBH-IS800. Which I suspect they&#8217;ve had for a couple years now but didn&#8217;t have what they felt was a low power enough solution in the phone to release it (e.g. no new development, its already in the can)</p>
<p>Copy n&#8217; paste? Who knows but if they deliver all the above I won&#8217;t miss it. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They had better not require a hardware upgrade to use 3.0 on current iPhone - it has not been required on previous hardware and Apple has still not delivered on promises it made and has yet to deliver on current hardware (Push notifications, for instance)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had better not require a hardware upgrade to use 3.0 on current iPhone &#8211; it has not been required on previous hardware and Apple has still not delivered on promises it made and has yet to deliver on current hardware (Push notifications, for instance)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Who?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not what I hope to see, but what I know I&#039;ll see: the demise of Palm. They had months to release the Pre before Apple came along, they knew they were on borrowed time, but they blew it. 

R.I.P. Palm 
1992 -- March 17, 2009.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not what I hope to see, but what I know I&#8217;ll see: the demise of Palm. They had months to release the Pre before Apple came along, they knew they were on borrowed time, but they blew it. </p>
<p>R.I.P. Palm<br />
1992 &#8212; March 17, 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi,

like everyone else cut and paste, user replacable battery but also from the dev side I wish they would  allow a user to install their own application for their own use without having to use app store. Also from a dev side it would  be great if you could dev apps on the pc rather than  needing a mac. Not needing to have itunes would also be great. Some how I doubt that Apple is going to loosen their lockin which is a shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>
<p>like everyone else cut and paste, user replacable battery but also from the dev side I wish they would  allow a user to install their own application for their own use without having to use app store. Also from a dev side it would  be great if you could dev apps on the pc rather than  needing a mac. Not needing to have itunes would also be great. Some how I doubt that Apple is going to loosen their lockin which is a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard L.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard L.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d get an iPhone if it had UMA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d get an iPhone if it had UMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Cahill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Cahill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s not much, except for a better camera, battery and more capacity/speed that can&#039;t be answered with a firmware upgrade. Video, MMS, Bluetooth and turn by turn GPS can all be done with a new OS.

If I have to buy new hardware to get a fully functional phone it probably wont be an iphone, as much as I like the one I have now. Maybe a Pre. I&#039;m a little tired of having half a feature because Steve says I don&#039;t need it. GPS with no software. Bluetooth with no audio support. Camera with no video. Maybe you&#039;ll pay to enable &quot;features&quot;. But not me. Not this time.
Gordon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not much, except for a better camera, battery and more capacity/speed that can&#8217;t be answered with a firmware upgrade. Video, MMS, Bluetooth and turn by turn GPS can all be done with a new OS.</p>
<p>If I have to buy new hardware to get a fully functional phone it probably wont be an iphone, as much as I like the one I have now. Maybe a Pre. I&#8217;m a little tired of having half a feature because Steve says I don&#8217;t need it. GPS with no software. Bluetooth with no audio support. Camera with no video. Maybe you&#8217;ll pay to enable &#8220;features&#8221;. But not me. Not this time.<br />
Gordon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sal B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d buy a new iPhone if:

- A $200 discount is given to those who have previous generations
- copy/paste
- video mode
- better battery life
- MMS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d buy a new iPhone if:</p>
<p>- A $200 discount is given to those who have previous generations<br />
- copy/paste<br />
- video mode<br />
- better battery life<br />
- MMS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely multitasking, support for bluetooth keyboard, faster processor -- these things would awesome on the new iPhone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely multitasking, support for bluetooth keyboard, faster processor &#8212; these things would awesome on the new iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Video mode for camera
- background processes
- copy/paste]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Video mode for camera<br />
- background processes<br />
- copy/paste</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TateJ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/iphone-30-preview-next-week-at-apple/#comment-414528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TateJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=31717#comment-414528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exchange sync with tasks and notes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exchange sync with tasks and notes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

