InformationWeek: we don’t get the Nokia N810… maybe tablets too.

Nokian810To be fair, Mitch Wagner of InformationWeek only got five minutes of playtime with the Nokia N810 and he even says we should be skeptical of his first take, which is generally negative. Even before Mitch got into the guts of his first impressions, he had me scratching his head with this: "Even the name is misleading — a "tablet" should be a device the size of a notebook computer." Pardon me for asking this, but, uh… who says? The Nokia Internet Tablets are every bit a tablet, regardless of size. Let me put it a different way: if all tablets should be the size of a notebook computer, what’s the benefit of a tablet over a standard notebook computer?  I’d say inking is one advantage to me, but for most folks it seems not to be. That leaves us with the portability and mobile nature of tablets, so requiring them to be the size of a notebook computer is just silly. Besides, should those tablets be 12 inches? 13 inches? An unwieldy 15.4 inches or larger?

Mitch does has some valid conceptual arguments against the N810 and other devices like it: they require you to rely on WiFi or for you to purchase and carry another device, say a phone, as your connection option. For some, that’s a reasonable and acceptable option; for others not, and that’s OK. If you only want to carry one device, the N810 isn’t likely to meet your needs and I’ll grant that, although the hard core among us could make it work. Give Mitch’s first thoughts a read (there were some valid criticisms and issues) and let me know what you think. I’m not saying the N810 is best device on the planet, but you have to keep a device’s purpose in mind when talking about it. According to the article, the N810 is "an expensive, limited-function device with no clear purpose". While I don’t think everyone should plunk down $479 for an N810, I do get the purpose. Do you? Does Mitch?

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.