<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InformationWeek: we get the Origami concept now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/informationweek-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/informationweek-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/informationweek-3/#comment-404276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JKK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 04:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/informationweek-3#comment-404276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;others are begining to get it too: &lt;a href=&quot;http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2007/05/walter-s-mossberg-with-samsung-q1-ultra.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2007/05/walter-s-mossberg-with-samsung-q1-ultra.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>others are begining to get it too: <a href="http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2007/05/walter-s-mossberg-with-samsung-q1-ultra.html" rel="nofollow">http://jkkmobile.blogspot.com/2007/05/walter-s-mossberg-with-samsung-q1-ultra.html</a></p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/informationweek-3/#comment-404277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/informationweek-3#comment-404277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Prodigal sons! I&#039;d still keep an eye on them once you let them back into the fold, Kevin...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Prodigal sons! I&#8217;d still keep an eye on them once you let them back into the fold, Kevin&#8230;
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/informationweek-3/#comment-404278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 20:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/informationweek-3#comment-404278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Maybe it&#039;s just me, but in reading the article, it seems like he spent the whole time bashing UMPCs, bashing Microsoft, and even getting his info wrong, since there have been a lot more than a few UMPCs released, and not just recently.  Also, the S-Xgen isn&#039;t a UMPC in any sense of the word, it&#039;s a Windows Mobile PDA with a keyboard and a cellular transceiver.  On top of that, saying that Having Vista standfard on UMPCs would be a big victory for Microsoft is like saying having Vista be the standard for PCs.  There aren&#039;t any big competitors, so getting the device to run the next iteration of windows is far from a &quot;big win.&quot;  This just seems like another idiot journalist talking out his rear on a subject he knows little to nothing about.  I mean, come on, he discounts 7 inch screens because &quot;there are some interesting devices with 5 inch screens&quot;  wtf?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but in reading the article, it seems like he spent the whole time bashing UMPCs, bashing Microsoft, and even getting his info wrong, since there have been a lot more than a few UMPCs released, and not just recently.  Also, the S-Xgen isn&#8217;t a UMPC in any sense of the word, it&#8217;s a Windows Mobile PDA with a keyboard and a cellular transceiver.  On top of that, saying that Having Vista standfard on UMPCs would be a big victory for Microsoft is like saying having Vista be the standard for PCs.  There aren&#8217;t any big competitors, so getting the device to run the next iteration of windows is far from a &#8220;big win.&#8221;  This just seems like another idiot journalist talking out his rear on a subject he knows little to nothing about.  I mean, come on, he discounts 7 inch screens because &#8220;there are some interesting devices with 5 inch screens&#8221;  wtf?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

