As everybody has pointed out, the problem with flash storage is limited write cycles. This can be negated though if you understand your application requirements. You can use a RAM disk for things like temp files and the browser cache. This will limit the amount of data _written_ to your flash device.

Try installing Windows XP Embedded on to your Flash Drive. You can have it setup so that the drive it’s installed on is Read-Only. Windows XP Embedded is just like the full version of Windows XP except you get to choose EXACTLY which services and programs you want before installing Windows. You can set it up so that it only reads the drive and uses a portion of RAM as a Hard Drive. You can configure it to use part of your computer’s RAM as a Hard Drive. When the computer shuts down, you can store your “Virtual Hard Drive” onto a more permanent storage device. There are all kinds of configurations you can put together.

I think the immediate resolution to this write problem is using Windows XP Embedded because it’s highly configurable. But I wouldn’t recommended it to anyone who has no patients. You do need a good understanding of Windows behind the scenes to successfully put this together. :)

just to tease you more Will:

todays industrial flash drives are more:

-reliable (1to2mil read/write, 5year warrant, 5to10 y uptime)
-faster ( 50to70 read /25to35 write )
-battery efficient ( 10% idle / 50% load)
-takes 100 x higher g-force trops

than normal hds … and yes they are more expensive for reason.

just show me a better hd for laptop….

I’m using a similar adapter (it’s way cheaper on eBay, BTW) with an 8GB CF card on an old Toshiba Portege 3110ct running Ubuntu… Works great!

Great idea and mod, but I just want to re-voice whats been said. CF cards are the past. Limited read/write cycles guarantee that your $500 mod will be dead faster than you think. And CF’s got slow speeds.

This is more of a ‘because I can’ hack than a true ‘improved over the original’ hack.

yes, camera flash card are no good for computer use, but there are flash cards for computing too…

I have been using these :
http://www.pretec.com/epages/Store.storefront/?ObjectPath=/Shops/Store.Pretec/Products/%22IENXXX-CO/4%22

more here:

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/09/20/conventional_hard_drive_obsoletism/page5.html

Here’s an interesting website about solid state memory… especially the third link from the top stating: “write endurance”.

http://www.storagesearch.com/ssd.html

why would anyone do that??

samsung 2.5″ 32gb ssd is $490

I agree that flash cards have limited write cycles but regarding CF cards what you said is not true; CF cards are generally much faster than SD cards due to the fact that the Read/Write controller is on board. Also due to their architecture they have the potential to store MUCH more than a regular SD card although now there are SDHC cards which will change this. In short CF cards are most definitely not dead, they are still the prefered choice for many products that demand high performance such as profesional DSLRs.
Finally this is unlikely to be a fake since a similar device has allready been released: http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/19/the-do-it-yourself-ssd-adapter/

I call BS.

1) Why CF? So far as anyone is concerned, it’s dead and slow. If you want large flash memory, you use SD.

2) Consumer flash-based memory cards have a limited lifetime. In short, they die after writing to them too much. With a digital camera, that’s OK, it’s millions of hi-res photos. But with a hard drive, it’s just weeks of normal usage.

This company is making a fake, and they’re trying to woo the world with it.