<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hands on the Motion LE1600</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/hands_on_the_mo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/hands_on_the_mo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/hands_on_the_mo/#comment-39489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/06/11/hands_on_the_mo#comment-39489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to learn more about Motion&#039;s LE 1600, or see it?

541-791-2850

jake@motioncomputing.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to learn more about Motion&#8217;s LE 1600, or see it?</p>
<p>541-791-2850</p>
<p><a href="mailto:jake@motioncomputing.com">jake@motioncomputing.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/hands_on_the_mo/#comment-39490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/06/11/hands_on_the_mo#comment-39490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Kwon, that&#039;s my feeling too.  If I go bigger than 10.4&quot; then I want higher resolution.  I just don&#039;t like the way XGA looks on 12+&quot; screens.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kwon, that&#8217;s my feeling too.  If I go bigger than 10.4&#8243; then I want higher resolution.  I just don&#8217;t like the way XGA looks on 12+&#8221; screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kwon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/hands_on_the_mo/#comment-39491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/06/11/hands_on_the_mo#comment-39491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        JK, I actually played with it at Oz Cebit 2 weeks ago. It really is well built - almost feels water tight. The carbon fibre chassis (I believe) provides both stiffness and grip. The battery end has a rounded surface at the back, which makes it ergonomic to hold. The size of the screen is begging for SXGA resolution. The demo unit didn&#039;t have VA screen but it was still impressive. Pen tracking seemed accurate. Having all the buttons on one side is a bit inconvenient. I&#039;m now using Toshiba m200 because of the extra screen resolution (mainly for mind mapping). My next tablet will be a slate with high resolution screen. Hopefully Motion will do one soon. Having owned a TC1100, I would still choose it over LE1600. At XGA resolution, I don&#039;t feel the need for a 12 inch screen. The smaller size of TC1100 makes it much more nimble for daily use.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK, I actually played with it at Oz Cebit 2 weeks ago. It really is well built &#8211; almost feels water tight. The carbon fibre chassis (I believe) provides both stiffness and grip. The battery end has a rounded surface at the back, which makes it ergonomic to hold. The size of the screen is begging for SXGA resolution. The demo unit didn&#8217;t have VA screen but it was still impressive. Pen tracking seemed accurate. Having all the buttons on one side is a bit inconvenient. I&#8217;m now using Toshiba m200 because of the extra screen resolution (mainly for mind mapping). My next tablet will be a slate with high resolution screen. Hopefully Motion will do one soon. Having owned a TC1100, I would still choose it over LE1600. At XGA resolution, I don&#8217;t feel the need for a 12 inch screen. The smaller size of TC1100 makes it much more nimble for daily use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/hands_on_the_mo/#comment-39492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2005/06/11/hands_on_the_mo#comment-39492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

