<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s web browser Chrome- browser as OS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/googles-web-bro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/googles-web-bro/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/googles-web-bro/#comment-365594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/googles-web-bro#comment-365594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Windows folks can give this a try when the beta release arrives tomorrow. I&#039;ll be installing on my UMPC for sure... the browser as OS is very appealing to me. The &quot;isolated tabs&quot; approach sounds very similar to the new IE8. In the new MS browser, each tab has its own process, so one crashed tab won&#039;t crash the browser. As I read up on Chrome, it sounds similar in that regard.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Windows folks can give this a try when the beta release arrives tomorrow. I&#8217;ll be installing on my UMPC for sure&#8230; the browser as OS is very appealing to me. The &#8220;isolated tabs&#8221; approach sounds very similar to the new IE8. In the new MS browser, each tab has its own process, so one crashed tab won&#8217;t crash the browser. As I read up on Chrome, it sounds similar in that regard.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Russell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/googles-web-bro/#comment-365595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/googles-web-bro#comment-365595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google online apps are great. From Gmail to just about everything else they&#039;ve done.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But it&#039;s going to be a new kind of test as we see them moving into new territory:&lt;br /&gt;
* Web App development kits and hosting&lt;br /&gt;
* Android, the mobile OS platform, and now&lt;br /&gt;
* Chrome/Gears&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can they move from the simple minimalist apps to a robust and more sophisticated environment?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m hoping the answer is yes, but we might just see a lot more immaturity issues and a lot more warts. This seems to be a lot more of a challenge than a web-based word processor or mail system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, they are fighting for a large part of the online future here, and they have lots of talented resources.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seems like the online wars... MS Live and their development platforms vs Google vs Adobe etc etc. Reminds me of when I played Risk as a child, except they are developing and marketing their way into market share instead of foreign soil. But if I remember correctly, it was not sheer power that wins the game, but the proper alliances. I think we might just see the same here. Time will tell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Google online apps are great. From Gmail to just about everything else they&#8217;ve done.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s going to be a new kind of test as we see them moving into new territory:<br />
* Web App development kits and hosting<br />
* Android, the mobile OS platform, and now<br />
* Chrome/Gears</p>
<p>Can they move from the simple minimalist apps to a robust and more sophisticated environment?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping the answer is yes, but we might just see a lot more immaturity issues and a lot more warts. This seems to be a lot more of a challenge than a web-based word processor or mail system.</p>
<p>On the other hand, they are fighting for a large part of the online future here, and they have lots of talented resources.</p>
<p>Seems like the online wars&#8230; MS Live and their development platforms vs Google vs Adobe etc etc. Reminds me of when I played Risk as a child, except they are developing and marketing their way into market share instead of foreign soil. But if I remember correctly, it was not sheer power that wins the game, but the proper alliances. I think we might just see the same here. Time will tell.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

