<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gear Diary smackdown: HTC Touch vs. HTC Touch Dual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/gear-diary-smac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gear-diary-smac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gear-diary-smac/#comment-396616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/gear-diary-smac#comment-396616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Can you still use the onscreen keyboard for text entry on the touch dual, just like the regular touch?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Can you still use the onscreen keyboard for text entry on the touch dual, just like the regular touch?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alasdair</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gear-diary-smac/#comment-396617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alasdair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/gear-diary-smac#comment-396617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;and the touch dual has a touch screen as well as the numeric pad so a double winner. I have both and for a 15 second review &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Touch Dual : &lt;br /&gt;
+++ : 3G (voice and data at the same time and faster), faster CPU and more storage so less lagginess &lt;br /&gt;
---: flaky and buggy software especially in searching contacts which is a real ball ache; slightly smaller screen than the touch; battery life unpredictable (3G); no WiFi  &lt;br /&gt;
000: different form factor doesn&#039;t really add much apart from faster texting which is a plus in the UK&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Touch: &lt;br /&gt;
+++ : sleek and nice size; WiFi; decent screen estate&lt;br /&gt;
--- : underpowered and undersize storage even with the 1 Gbyte microSD in the package the device grinds when put under load (even with only a couple of apps, no 3G&lt;br /&gt;
000 : poor texting &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the killer for me is 3G so the dual is my device of choice at the mo if I had 3g and the faster chip in the touch I&#039;d stick with that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>and the touch dual has a touch screen as well as the numeric pad so a double winner. I have both and for a 15 second review </p>
<p>Touch Dual : <br />
+++ : 3G (voice and data at the same time and faster), faster CPU and more storage so less lagginess <br />
&#8212;: flaky and buggy software especially in searching contacts which is a real ball ache; slightly smaller screen than the touch; battery life unpredictable (3G); no WiFi  <br />
000: different form factor doesn&#8217;t really add much apart from faster texting which is a plus in the UK</p>
<p>Touch: <br />
+++ : sleek and nice size; WiFi; decent screen estate<br />
&#8212; : underpowered and undersize storage even with the 1 Gbyte microSD in the package the device grinds when put under load (even with only a couple of apps, no 3G<br />
000 : poor texting </p>
<p>the killer for me is 3G so the dual is my device of choice at the mo if I had 3g and the faster chip in the touch I&#8217;d stick with that.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluemonq</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gear-diary-smac/#comment-396618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluemonq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/gear-diary-smac#comment-396618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I would think that the twice as speedy chip in the Dual would make it a winner?&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I would think that the twice as speedy chip in the Dual would make it a winner?</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

