<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gateway Adds an AMD Netbook to the Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: REMF</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/#comment-421648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REMF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=38923#comment-421648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if this is merely a prototype for an AMD Neo2/780G based system then i am happy, but i am not interested in it as it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this is merely a prototype for an AMD Neo2/780G based system then i am happy, but i am not interested in it as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/#comment-421647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=38923#comment-421647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s my long answer ;)

http://scottsoapbox.com/2009/06/27/gateway-sets-itself-up-to-fail/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my long answer ;)</p>
<p><a href="http://scottsoapbox.com/2009/06/27/gateway-sets-itself-up-to-fail/" rel="nofollow">http://scottsoapbox.com/2009/06/27/gateway-sets-itself-up-to-fail/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/#comment-421646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=38923#comment-421646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merely a poser...

From what I can tell from the benchmarks, this AMD Chip @ 1.3Ghz would be on par with the Atom @ 1.6Ghz - Unfortunately it&#039;s clocked at 1.2...

And the Radeon X1270 GPU scores 328 on 3DMark06.  Which is better than the 100ish that Intel&#039;s integrated scores but well below Asus N10&#039;s 9300M score of 1417 (ION should be a touch higher with the 9400M)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merely a poser&#8230;</p>
<p>From what I can tell from the benchmarks, this AMD Chip @ 1.3Ghz would be on par with the Atom @ 1.6Ghz &#8211; Unfortunately it&#8217;s clocked at 1.2&#8230;</p>
<p>And the Radeon X1270 GPU scores 328 on 3DMark06.  Which is better than the 100ish that Intel&#8217;s integrated scores but well below Asus N10&#8242;s 9300M score of 1417 (ION should be a touch higher with the 9400M)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enterman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/#comment-421645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enterman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=38923#comment-421645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pretty sure some Atom&#039;s are more powerful than the particular AMD inside this. I&#039;ll stick to my dual core Raon Everun Note :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure some Atom&#8217;s are more powerful than the particular AMD inside this. I&#8217;ll stick to my dual core Raon Everun Note :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/#comment-421644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=38923#comment-421644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is an acer product, Acer is sneaking in this lower powered AMD chip into it&#039;s 11 inch netbook as well. I like the look of the Gateway much better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an acer product, Acer is sneaking in this lower powered AMD chip into it&#8217;s 11 inch netbook as well. I like the look of the Gateway much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EtS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/gateway-adds-an-amd-netbook-to-the-market/#comment-421643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EtS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=38923#comment-421643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this a netbook or cheap ultraportable?  Hhmmm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a netbook or cheap ultraportable?  Hhmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

