<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freescale Tries to Undercut Intel Atom Netbooks at $199</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/#comment-410719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27166#comment-410719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you are right on with your speculation about Android and Snapdragon.  Qualcomm has been making quite a bit of noise about their efforts in the netbook arena and the only way this makes sense is if they have an OS that consumers will recognize and developers will support.  Red Flag Linux isnt it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right on with your speculation about Android and Snapdragon.  Qualcomm has been making quite a bit of noise about their efforts in the netbook arena and the only way this makes sense is if they have an OS that consumers will recognize and developers will support.  Red Flag Linux isnt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HereAndNow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/#comment-410718</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HereAndNow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27166#comment-410718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brodi

How are you going to feel unproductive, if it does what you need it to do? You seem to be generalizing for a more advanced user. If all a person needs to do is browse the web and check their email, an OS like Android would be perfect.

I am a technical user, but I DEFINITELY plan to get an Android-powered netbook, if they ever become available. It is likely to be small &amp; lightweight, fast (especially on x86), long battery life, lots of downloadable apps, capable of making cell phone calls and won&#039;t require any of the typical Windows maintenance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brodi</p>
<p>How are you going to feel unproductive, if it does what you need it to do? You seem to be generalizing for a more advanced user. If all a person needs to do is browse the web and check their email, an OS like Android would be perfect.</p>
<p>I am a technical user, but I DEFINITELY plan to get an Android-powered netbook, if they ever become available. It is likely to be small &amp; lightweight, fast (especially on x86), long battery life, lots of downloadable apps, capable of making cell phone calls and won&#8217;t require any of the typical Windows maintenance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/#comment-410717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27166#comment-410717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is something that bothers me, what about flash support? the free alternatives are not mature enough and nowadays flash it is a must for any web browsing experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something that bothers me, what about flash support? the free alternatives are not mature enough and nowadays flash it is a must for any web browsing experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brodi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/#comment-410716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brodi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27166#comment-410716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if im going to be stuck with a mobile OS it certainly wouldnt be on a device as large as a laptop.

after people start buying these... then they sit down with their &quot;laptop&quot; &amp; start using such a simplified OS it wont take long to see how silly they feel &amp; how nonproductive the whole experience really is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if im going to be stuck with a mobile OS it certainly wouldnt be on a device as large as a laptop.</p>
<p>after people start buying these&#8230; then they sit down with their &#8220;laptop&#8221; &amp; start using such a simplified OS it wont take long to see how silly they feel &amp; how nonproductive the whole experience really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/#comment-410715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27166#comment-410715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please please please please! Do NOT compare disparate processor architectures based on CPU speed. This is a completely useless comparison for performance characteristics. It is only useful in a marketing sense that uneducated consumers equate more MHz with better (or more megapixels with better). Certainly readers of this blog would know the difference.

In fact, the lower clock may well be an advantage for the Freescale, as clock speed directly relates to power consumption regardless of architecture, so assuming the FS proc provides the desired performance envelope, it is an advantage to do so with a lower clock rate.

Patrick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please please please! Do NOT compare disparate processor architectures based on CPU speed. This is a completely useless comparison for performance characteristics. It is only useful in a marketing sense that uneducated consumers equate more MHz with better (or more megapixels with better). Certainly readers of this blog would know the difference.</p>
<p>In fact, the lower clock may well be an advantage for the Freescale, as clock speed directly relates to power consumption regardless of architecture, so assuming the FS proc provides the desired performance envelope, it is an advantage to do so with a lower clock rate.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrisboff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/freescale-tries-to-undercut-intel-atom-netbooks-at-199/#comment-410714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrisboff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=27166#comment-410714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Android!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

