<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Creative Zii EGG Outputs 1080p, But SDK Will Cost You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The touchscreen will be on every player, it&#039;s just that Android itself does not natively support multi touch. Also, there is no Plaszma OS version or Android version- they are the same device. The Plaszma OS is installed when you get this dev kit, but Creative is offering Android as an update if the developer/oem/user wants it a bit after ship date.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The touchscreen will be on every player, it&#8217;s just that Android itself does not natively support multi touch. Also, there is no Plaszma OS version or Android version- they are the same device. The Plaszma OS is installed when you get this dev kit, but Creative is offering Android as an update if the developer/oem/user wants it a bit after ship date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nameless</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nameless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s rather enticing. Bonus points for NOT being a phone.

However, the 3.5&quot; 480x320 screen is rather disappointing (even though it&#039;s right in line with the iPhone and iPod touch), I&#039;d need a capacitive stylus to use it with, there&#039;s no hardware thumbboard, and I&#039;d have to abandon all my Windows Mobile software.

On the other hand, it has GOBS of storage inside and a FULL-SIZE SDHC card slot, not to mention multi-touch. (But 10-point multi-touch on a 3.5&quot; screen? Can you even FIT ten fingers on it?)

The Zii Egg, or the Samsung Mondi...it&#039;s going to be a tough call.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s rather enticing. Bonus points for NOT being a phone.</p>
<p>However, the 3.5&#8243; 480&#215;320 screen is rather disappointing (even though it&#8217;s right in line with the iPhone and iPod touch), I&#8217;d need a capacitive stylus to use it with, there&#8217;s no hardware thumbboard, and I&#8217;d have to abandon all my Windows Mobile software.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it has GOBS of storage inside and a FULL-SIZE SDHC card slot, not to mention multi-touch. (But 10-point multi-touch on a 3.5&#8243; screen? Can you even FIT ten fingers on it?)</p>
<p>The Zii Egg, or the Samsung Mondi&#8230;it&#8217;s going to be a tough call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will indeed be a very good device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will indeed be a very good device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REMF</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REMF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question for you Kevin:

Creative have said elsewhere that the mutli-touch screen won&#039;t be available for android because android doesn&#039;t support multi-touch................ and yet only last week we learn that android 2.0 will indeed support multi-touch.

which is it, and why would CL make such a daft decision?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question for you Kevin:</p>
<p>Creative have said elsewhere that the mutli-touch screen won&#8217;t be available for android because android doesn&#8217;t support multi-touch&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. and yet only last week we learn that android 2.0 will indeed support multi-touch.</p>
<p>which is it, and why would CL make such a daft decision?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: REMF</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REMF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite frankly i wouldn&#039;t buy this device without android, for two reasons:
1. Creative has a terrible history of software support for hardware devices.
2. To compete with Apple/Android for developer support it will need to adopt the latter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite frankly i wouldn&#8217;t buy this device without android, for two reasons:<br />
1. Creative has a terrible history of software support for hardware devices.<br />
2. To compete with Apple/Android for developer support it will need to adopt the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadget Merc</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadget Merc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To bad you cant make voice calls with it, then without a doubt we would get a review from Matt Miller.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad you cant make voice calls with it, then without a doubt we would get a review from Matt Miller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Manga</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Manga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My apologies Kevin, I meant the Plaszma SDK. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies Kevin, I meant the Plaszma SDK. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact Moorestown IS going to help elevate Android above competition :)
Android is scheduled as far as I know to get on top of Moorestown, giving it the edge over the rest of the platforms for the new MID-cell market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact Moorestown IS going to help elevate Android above competition :)<br />
Android is scheduled as far as I know to get on top of Moorestown, giving it the edge over the rest of the platforms for the new MID-cell market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul, the Android SDK is free. I&#039;ve downloaded it. The $399 cost is for the Plaszma SDK, not the Android SDK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, the Android SDK is free. I&#8217;ve downloaded it. The $399 cost is for the Plaszma SDK, not the Android SDK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Manga</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Manga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would think that the SDK for Android development, which is supposedly opensource would be at a lower price point if not free. Well see how app-development for this device [if it does not sell well] turns out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that the SDK for Android development, which is supposedly opensource would be at a lower price point if not free. Well see how app-development for this device [if it does not sell well] turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoobie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/free-creative-zii-egg-outputs-1080p-but-sdk-will-cost-you/#comment-423282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scoobie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=40977#comment-423282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do think Creative, Sony and others are sensible if considering Android as the base platform to compete with the ipod touch. 

I think the next year or two is going to see a massive battle in the portable OS space between Apple, Microsoft and google Android. 

Intel could be left out in the cold if they are betting on a Linux platform for Moorestown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think Creative, Sony and others are sensible if considering Android as the base platform to compete with the ipod touch. </p>
<p>I think the next year or two is going to see a massive battle in the portable OS space between Apple, Microsoft and google Android. </p>
<p>Intel could be left out in the cold if they are betting on a Linux platform for Moorestown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

