<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget Windows Mobile 6.5. Look at Windows Mobile 6.5.1!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/#comment-427391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=47667#comment-427391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks flashy. I haven&#039;t had a chance to use it myself yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks flashy. I haven&#8217;t had a chance to use it myself yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikecane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/#comment-427390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikecane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=47667#comment-427390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Zune.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Zune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/#comment-427389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=47667#comment-427389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see that happening, and that&#039;s the problem with WinMo. MS has contracts with the carriers/ partners and they can&#039;t just push out updates. It&#039;s the WinMo hell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see that happening, and that&#8217;s the problem with WinMo. MS has contracts with the carriers/ partners and they can&#8217;t just push out updates. It&#8217;s the WinMo hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank McPherson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/#comment-427388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank McPherson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=47667#comment-427388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll be more blunt than Jake. If Microsoft releases this directly to users and NOT via carriers then it will be a win. If updates like this get stuck in carrier hell, it doesn&#039;t matter. It would be great if the updates were OTA, but just providing them for direct user download on a Microsoft web site would be a BIG improvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be more blunt than Jake. If Microsoft releases this directly to users and NOT via carriers then it will be a win. If updates like this get stuck in carrier hell, it doesn&#8217;t matter. It would be great if the updates were OTA, but just providing them for direct user download on a Microsoft web site would be a BIG improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/#comment-427387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=47667#comment-427387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah yes, the eternal promise of OTA updates for Windows Mobile :)  The situation is supposed to be fixed in 6.5 but I guess we&#039;ll just have to wait and see whether these improvements ever make it to anybody&#039;s phone as an update.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the eternal promise of OTA updates for Windows Mobile :)  The situation is supposed to be fixed in 6.5 but I guess we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see whether these improvements ever make it to anybody&#8217;s phone as an update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky B.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/forget-windows-mobile-6-5-look-at-windows-mobile-6-5-1/#comment-427386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricky B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=47667#comment-427386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using builds with this on my Touch Pro since before 6.5 went RTM -- it&#039;s much nicer.  I don&#039;t like how the bubbles look in those screenshots, but some of the theming -- which can be done much more easily than in the past, I gather, without hacking at least -- makes it look beautiful, and it is much more usable. 

You get just as much screen space, too -- the wasted whitespace on the top bar is gone to make more room for the bar on the bottom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using builds with this on my Touch Pro since before 6.5 went RTM &#8212; it&#8217;s much nicer.  I don&#8217;t like how the bubbles look in those screenshots, but some of the theming &#8212; which can be done much more easily than in the past, I gather, without hacking at least &#8212; makes it look beautiful, and it is much more usable. </p>
<p>You get just as much screen space, too &#8212; the wasted whitespace on the top bar is gone to make more room for the bar on the bottom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

