Comments on: First real world Intel Atom benchmarks appear- think Celeron http://gigaom.com/mobile/first-real-worl/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: JR http://gigaom.com/mobile/first-real-worl/#comment-370300 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:40:07 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl#comment-370300

Soooo… Would anyone like to compare the A110 stealy against the atom. From the sounds of it the stealy may consume more power but it actually performs better than the atom. I reckon that intel will dual and quad core these little beasts as it sounds like they will only have any acceptable strength when theres a pack of them.

Sounds like my umpc or sub-notebook purchase this xmas will be run by via :)

]]> By: gorkon http://gigaom.com/mobile/first-real-worl/#comment-370301 Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:42:53 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl#comment-370301

Makes me feel justified in not waiting for Atom. My battery life is ok now. If that’s all I get, then I will wait a while before ebaying the Eee 702.

]]> By: Ctitanic http://gigaom.com/mobile/first-real-worl/#comment-370302 Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:43:28 +0000 http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/first-real-worl#comment-370302

So I was right all this time when I was saying that the Atom at 800 MHz was a lot worse than the Intel Celeron used in my old Q1!

This test was performed in a Atom at 1.6 GHz double the speed of the one being used so far in the UMPC in the market. ;)

]]>