<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.5 Released- Less Filling, Tastes Great</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frustrated Consumer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/#comment-421865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frustrated Consumer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=39125#comment-421865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really?  Works fine for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  Works fine for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William C Bonner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/#comment-421864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William C Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=39125#comment-421864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s coincidence, or related, but I use a NIKON utility (ViewNX) to manage the raw files from my SLR and add geotag details.  This morning after upgrading Firefox to 3.5 I noticed that the geotag portion of the tool no longer allowed me to properly add data to photos, though it still correctly displays pins from previously tagged photos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s coincidence, or related, but I use a NIKON utility (ViewNX) to manage the raw files from my SLR and add geotag details.  This morning after upgrading Firefox to 3.5 I noticed that the geotag portion of the tool no longer allowed me to properly add data to photos, though it still correctly displays pins from previously tagged photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/#comment-421863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=39125#comment-421863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been running this all evening and I&#039;m afraid I&#039;m yet to see any of the performance improvements Mozilla have been promoting.  Tab switching and management is better and the private browsing is better designed than IE8 but it&#039;s no faster than the previous version.

Are any of you seeing noticeably better performance?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running this all evening and I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;m yet to see any of the performance improvements Mozilla have been promoting.  Tab switching and management is better and the private browsing is better designed than IE8 but it&#8217;s no faster than the previous version.</p>
<p>Are any of you seeing noticeably better performance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSMR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/#comment-421862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSMR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=39125#comment-421862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(The sort of wrong colour you&#039;ll get in practice will depend on your screen. And if your OS doesn&#039;t support colour management this is all moot.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(The sort of wrong colour you&#8217;ll get in practice will depend on your screen. And if your OS doesn&#8217;t support colour management this is all moot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSMR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/firefox-3-5-released-less-filling-tastes-great/#comment-421861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSMR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=39125#comment-421861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not happy with this version as they seem to have downgraded the colour management. So the colour is wrong (too dark mainly) on most images on the internet. It lost ICCv4 support in this version. You can see for yourself here: http://www.color.org/version4html.xalter

I hope they fix this quickly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not happy with this version as they seem to have downgraded the colour management. So the colour is wrong (too dark mainly) on most images on the internet. It lost ICCv4 support in this version. You can see for yourself here: <a href="http://www.color.org/version4html.xalter" rel="nofollow">http://www.color.org/version4html.xalter</a></p>
<p>I hope they fix this quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

