<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Femtocells Are Great, but the Payment Model is Backwards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 08:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim J.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I remember correctly in their ToS, and I believe it was Verizon, when you install this femtocell you are also giving the carrier the ability to allow other outside subscribers access to use this device for their phone calls.  I was a little surprised at that and it just plays to your argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly in their ToS, and I believe it was Verizon, when you install this femtocell you are also giving the carrier the ability to allow other outside subscribers access to use this device for their phone calls.  I was a little surprised at that and it just plays to your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, exactly this model is just plain nuts. I can only assume this is the tip, where the try to force the early adopters or coverage desperate to pay for the future where they will be begging people to put these things in their homes... or so I hope, cause I sure as hell won&#039;t be paying anyone to use my bandwidth to make a service work which I already paid them for :p. On a aside, but until in home QOS is standard then your now voip cel call might be worse when the kids have 3 torrent clients running for the latest wow patch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, exactly this model is just plain nuts. I can only assume this is the tip, where the try to force the early adopters or coverage desperate to pay for the future where they will be begging people to put these things in their homes&#8230; or so I hope, cause I sure as hell won&#8217;t be paying anyone to use my bandwidth to make a service work which I already paid them for :p. On a aside, but until in home QOS is standard then your now voip cel call might be worse when the kids have 3 torrent clients running for the latest wow patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HSK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[READ the offerings - you do not HAVE to buy the unlimited option with the ATT Microcell.  You can use your existing minutes.  So the ATT version is actually a better deal than Verizon&#039;s because it is $100 cheaper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>READ the offerings &#8211; you do not HAVE to buy the unlimited option with the ATT Microcell.  You can use your existing minutes.  So the ATT version is actually a better deal than Verizon&#8217;s because it is $100 cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still think the VZW method is a better deal. Of course, I don&#039;t have any issues staying within my plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think the VZW method is a better deal. Of course, I don&#8217;t have any issues staying within my plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin

I agree.  The carrier&#039;s should sell these things at cost with no monthly fee.  It doesn&#039;t cost the carriers anything (as you could use a land line or VOIP at home instead of your cel so it&#039;s not like you going to use less minutes) and could save a customer from switch networks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin</p>
<p>I agree.  The carrier&#8217;s should sell these things at cost with no monthly fee.  It doesn&#8217;t cost the carriers anything (as you could use a land line or VOIP at home instead of your cel so it&#8217;s not like you going to use less minutes) and could save a customer from switch networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But Kevin,
  It&#039;s already been pointed out SEVERAL times on this page that AT&amp;T are NOT charging more for this service.  Let&#039;s break it down once again:

VZW - no option for unlimited minutes, higher upfront cost on the box
T-Mobile - N/A
Sprint - $5/month *mandatory* fee whether you want to get &#039;free&#039; minutes or not, or $20/month for unlimited minutes on all connected lines.
AT&amp;T - Both options are availble - No fee, no minutes, or $20/mo for unlimited minutes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Kevin,<br />
  It&#8217;s already been pointed out SEVERAL times on this page that AT&amp;T are NOT charging more for this service.  Let&#8217;s break it down once again:</p>
<p>VZW &#8211; no option for unlimited minutes, higher upfront cost on the box<br />
T-Mobile &#8211; N/A<br />
Sprint &#8211; $5/month *mandatory* fee whether you want to get &#8216;free&#8217; minutes or not, or $20/month for unlimited minutes on all connected lines.<br />
AT&amp;T &#8211; Both options are availble &#8211; No fee, no minutes, or $20/mo for unlimited minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HSK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KT - sorry, I did not mean to vent so much on what you said - you were fair, but elsewhere on the web it has been bad. I think @ $150 it is still a good piece of equipment if you want to improve your in-home signal.  If ATT is not deliverying, you should move to another carrier.  All of the carriers are going to upgrade at their own pace - so if one does not work well, then you need to move on. IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KT &#8211; sorry, I did not mean to vent so much on what you said &#8211; you were fair, but elsewhere on the web it has been bad. I think @ $150 it is still a good piece of equipment if you want to improve your in-home signal.  If ATT is not deliverying, you should move to another carrier.  All of the carriers are going to upgrade at their own pace &#8211; so if one does not work well, then you need to move on. IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On VZW your calls through the &#039;cell count against your plan minutes, whereas AT&amp;T charges an optional upgrade for unlimited minutes via the &#039;cell.  Sprint charges $5 for no minutes, or $20 for unlimited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On VZW your calls through the &#8216;cell count against your plan minutes, whereas AT&amp;T charges an optional upgrade for unlimited minutes via the &#8216;cell.  Sprint charges $5 for no minutes, or $20 for unlimited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your bottom line is absolutely correct. But AT&amp;T is getting the lion&#039;s share of the blood-bath because they&#039;re charging more and they seem to have the biggest reliability issue. It&#039;s also not the first time I pointed out the backwards model: http://jkontherun.com/2008/11/06/femtocells-arri/

&quot;I tend to agree with Marguerite Reardon from CNET who says &quot;cell phone operators shouldn’t actually be charging customers an extrafee to use these services. They should be giving it away for free inexchange for making their networks more efficient.&quot; is what I said back then.

In your case, it may save money. I already dumped my landline so this is an additional cost to me. The point being (as I said in the first comment), &quot;Not saying it’s a bad deal for everyone, but folks have to carefully evaluate the costs and benefits.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your bottom line is absolutely correct. But AT&#038;T is getting the lion&#8217;s share of the blood-bath because they&#8217;re charging more and they seem to have the biggest reliability issue. It&#8217;s also not the first time I pointed out the backwards model: <a href="http://jkontherun.com/2008/11/06/femtocells-arri/" rel="nofollow">http://jkontherun.com/2008/11/06/femtocells-arri/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I tend to agree with Marguerite Reardon from CNET who says &#8220;cell phone operators shouldn’t actually be charging customers an extrafee to use these services. They should be giving it away for free inexchange for making their networks more efficient.&#8221; is what I said back then.</p>
<p>In your case, it may save money. I already dumped my landline so this is an additional cost to me. The point being (as I said in the first comment), &#8220;Not saying it’s a bad deal for everyone, but folks have to carefully evaluate the costs and benefits.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/femtocells-are-great-but-the-payment-model-is-backwards/#comment-425679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=44630#comment-425679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get why these other providers get away with charging the monthly fee, when Verizon doesn&#039;t. On VZW, you just pay for the device, and you&#039;re good to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get why these other providers get away with charging the monthly fee, when Verizon doesn&#8217;t. On VZW, you just pay for the device, and you&#8217;re good to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

