<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early 2008 Silverthorne release: new MIDs and UMPCs around the corner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Maybe hardware designers will realize that what mainstream users want is not the Microsoft 7&quot; brick but rather a jacket size pocket laptop with a touch type keyboard.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Maybe hardware designers will realize that what mainstream users want is not the Microsoft 7&#8243; brick but rather a jacket size pocket laptop with a touch type keyboard.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Lee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Sumocat, how can you say the 2008 platform will not perform any better than the ones out now?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/news.php?tid=777324&amp;starttime=0&amp;endtime=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/news.php?tid=777324&amp;starttime=0&amp;endtime=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Menlow/Silverthorne CPU is said operate at 900 MHz to 1.8 GHz. The A110 runs at 800 MHz.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sumocat, how can you say the 2008 platform will not perform any better than the ones out now?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/news.php?tid=777324&#038;starttime=0&#038;endtime=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/news.php?tid=777324&#038;starttime=0&#038;endtime=0</a></p>
<p>Menlow/Silverthorne CPU is said operate at 900 MHz to 1.8 GHz. The A110 runs at 800 MHz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Propst</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Propst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Kevin, what are you looking to do with your next gen UMPC?  Honestly I&#039;m sitting here with my Q1b waiting for something that really makes me say yes I will do more than use OneNote, IE, and the occasional Word Doc.  I don&#039;t use it for much media (video playback isn&#039;t always the greatest) it seems to suit my uses without me wanting to buy the next best thing right now.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Kevin, what are you looking to do with your next gen UMPC?  Honestly I&#8217;m sitting here with my Q1b waiting for something that really makes me say yes I will do more than use OneNote, IE, and the occasional Word Doc.  I don&#8217;t use it for much media (video playback isn&#8217;t always the greatest) it seems to suit my uses without me wanting to buy the next best thing right now.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;oh how you guys dissing the A1xx are going to live to eat your words. i am definitely going to get a good laugh when you all go out to buy these new 2008 devices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;you do realize that &quot;Menlow&quot; isnt going to be any faster than the current A1xx offerings right? if you dont believe me there are several other UMPC-specific bloggers out there that will confirm this. Menlow is just going to have an even smaller architecture &amp; lower power consumption, but not faster.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;even if this dual core pans out, once again it wont technically be any faster. it will be able to multitask better, but the speed itself wont increase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;from pretty much this point on, UMPC&#039;s will NEVER have standard notebook processors again (except for a select few vendors). Intel was not able to cram ULV tech into a small enough, efficient enough, cool enough, package for the even smaller 4-7&quot; market. that is the reason they created this whole new subset of chips. by doing this it allows them to leave their current ULV notebook chips alone &amp; keep building upon it because of the flexible nature of ultraportables.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if you cant except the A1XX offerings because of ill-perceived speed issues, then you will never own another UMPC again &amp; will have to move up to the subnote/ultraportable category.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh how you guys dissing the A1xx are going to live to eat your words. i am definitely going to get a good laugh when you all go out to buy these new 2008 devices.</p>
<p>you do realize that &#8220;Menlow&#8221; isnt going to be any faster than the current A1xx offerings right? if you dont believe me there are several other UMPC-specific bloggers out there that will confirm this. Menlow is just going to have an even smaller architecture &#038; lower power consumption, but not faster.</p>
<p>even if this dual core pans out, once again it wont technically be any faster. it will be able to multitask better, but the speed itself wont increase.</p>
<p>from pretty much this point on, UMPC&#8217;s will NEVER have standard notebook processors again (except for a select few vendors). Intel was not able to cram ULV tech into a small enough, efficient enough, cool enough, package for the even smaller 4-7&#8243; market. that is the reason they created this whole new subset of chips. by doing this it allows them to leave their current ULV notebook chips alone &#038; keep building upon it because of the flexible nature of ultraportables.</p>
<p>if you cant except the A1XX offerings because of ill-perceived speed issues, then you will never own another UMPC again &#038; will have to move up to the subnote/ultraportable category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumocat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumocat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Perhaps Intel hasn&#039;t noticed, but Apple has mobile Internet devices ready for the 2007 holiday buying season. Rolling out new MIDs in 2008 will be a little late. But since Intel is inside Macs, maybe they could push an Apple UMPC into the works.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Perhaps Intel hasn&#8217;t noticed, but Apple has mobile Internet devices ready for the 2007 holiday buying season. Rolling out new MIDs in 2008 will be a little late. But since Intel is inside Macs, maybe they could push an Apple UMPC into the works.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.TeesMyBody.com T-Shirts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[www.TeesMyBody.com T-Shirts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I read that Menlow is coming out late Nov, but I see it released early Jan.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I read that Menlow is coming out late Nov, but I see it released early Jan.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;WLS, I hadn&#039;t heard that the Menlow platform is due out in the 4th quarter and a quick Google didn&#039;t turn anything up. Is there a link or announcement that I missed? That would be great news if true and might show some newly available UMPCs in 1Q 2008. My gut tells me that we&#039;ll see demo units with the chipset at CES in January but few new devices will be readily available in the first quarter. I&#039;m hoping to be wrong on that. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>WLS, I hadn&#8217;t heard that the Menlow platform is due out in the 4th quarter and a quick Google didn&#8217;t turn anything up. Is there a link or announcement that I missed? That would be great news if true and might show some newly available UMPCs in 1Q 2008. My gut tells me that we&#8217;ll see demo units with the chipset at CES in January but few new devices will be readily available in the first quarter. I&#8217;m hoping to be wrong on that. ;)</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WLS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/early-2008-silv/#comment-400022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WLS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/09/06/early-2008-silv#comment-400022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Menlow is due by the 4th quarter also and is based on Silverthorne. I&#039;m waiting for some of these Menlow mobile based UMPC&#039;s also in first Q 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Menlow is due by the 4th quarter also and is based on Silverthorne. I&#8217;m waiting for some of these Menlow mobile based UMPC&#8217;s also in first Q 2008.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

