<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could the Sprint InstinctHD Displace a Pocketable HD Camcorder?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/could-the-sprint-instincthd-displace-a-pocketable-hd-camcorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/could-the-sprint-instincthd-displace-a-pocketable-hd-camcorder/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSMR</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/could-the-sprint-instincthd-displace-a-pocketable-hd-camcorder/#comment-425882</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSMR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/?p=45129#comment-425882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video is definitely a good move: the low quality images you get from phones will be more acceptable in video, and presumably it doesn&#039;t cost much to add the feature.

HD is a gimmick. Like 5 megapixel phone cameras. Even with 1/4 the number of pixels the image is not resolution-limited. Considering the extreme sensor and lens size constraints, screen-resolution video is fine and that&#039;s how video would be mostly viewed anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video is definitely a good move: the low quality images you get from phones will be more acceptable in video, and presumably it doesn&#8217;t cost much to add the feature.</p>
<p>HD is a gimmick. Like 5 megapixel phone cameras. Even with 1/4 the number of pixels the image is not resolution-limited. Considering the extreme sensor and lens size constraints, screen-resolution video is fine and that&#8217;s how video would be mostly viewed anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

