<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constant touch settings: ink fight, round 2!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/constant_touch_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/constant_touch_/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:26:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDW</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/constant_touch_/#comment-49031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JDW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/constant_touch_#comment-49031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Is there an improvement in the handwriting recognition with the smoother settings similar to what you would expect with an OCR program running on a document scanned at a higher resolution vs lower resolution?
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Is there an improvement in the handwriting recognition with the smoother settings similar to what you would expect with an OCR program running on a document scanned at a higher resolution vs lower resolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/constant_touch_/#comment-49032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/constant_touch_#comment-49032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the tip...whoevers it was :)

I&#039;ve set it to 1 on my i7210, and inking now performs much better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip&#8230;whoevers it was :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve set it to 1 on my i7210, and inking now performs much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Bancroft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/constant_touch_/#comment-49033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Bancroft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/constant_touch_#comment-49033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        The one who posted that comment was none other than Brian from TinyPodcast! He knows way more about UMPCs and Tablet PCs than I do. I had no idea this setting even existed! :-)
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        The one who posted that comment was none other than Brian from TinyPodcast! He knows way more about UMPCs and Tablet PCs than I do. I had no idea this setting even existed! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ink Fight: Differences Between Active Digitizer and Passive Touch</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/constant_touch_/#comment-49034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ink Fight: Differences Between Active Digitizer and Passive Touch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/11/16/constant_touch_#comment-49034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

