<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Computer in a keyboard makes for a mobile desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/computer_in_a_k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/computer_in_a_k/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/computer_in_a_k/#comment-406370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/computer_in_a_k#comment-406370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m thinking Commodore 64, the Tandy TRS-80, both of which I owned. Really this form factor isn&#039;t a new concept by any stretch, but it&#039;s interesting to see a return to a retro design but upgraded to meet today&#039;s computing needs. I think it&#039;s a great alternative for people who may be a bit intimidated by all the cabling, etc. necessary in a traditional desktop setup. &lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m thinking Commodore 64, the Tandy TRS-80, both of which I owned. Really this form factor isn&#8217;t a new concept by any stretch, but it&#8217;s interesting to see a return to a retro design but upgraded to meet today&#8217;s computing needs. I think it&#8217;s a great alternative for people who may be a bit intimidated by all the cabling, etc. necessary in a traditional desktop setup. </p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin White</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/computer_in_a_k/#comment-406371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/computer_in_a_k#comment-406371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Wow, it&#039;s the A500/A1200 all over again! (non-uber-geek americans are probably going, what? I&#039;m sure UK/europeans are having fond memories...)&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wow, it&#8217;s the A500/A1200 all over again! (non-uber-geek americans are probably going, what? I&#8217;m sure UK/europeans are having fond memories&#8230;)</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian Dietrich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/computer_in_a_k/#comment-406372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fabian Dietrich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/computer_in_a_k#comment-406372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;When I was there they said it starts at approx. 750 Bucks, which is a bad price. I mean, think about it: Maximum 3 Ghz Pentium 4, no dualcore, 512 megs of ram standard, and  the keyboard just sucks! The Mac Mini plus keyboard costs less than that, has a Core 2 Duo CPU, 1 Gig of RAM standard, and it&#039;s from a company that could afford a booth larger than 4 square meters (apple wasn&#039;t at cebit though)! It&#039;s a no-no for me, even though there was one thing I liked: Boot times were extremely good, less than 20 seconds on xp.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>When I was there they said it starts at approx. 750 Bucks, which is a bad price. I mean, think about it: Maximum 3 Ghz Pentium 4, no dualcore, 512 megs of ram standard, and  the keyboard just sucks! The Mac Mini plus keyboard costs less than that, has a Core 2 Duo CPU, 1 Gig of RAM standard, and it&#8217;s from a company that could afford a booth larger than 4 square meters (apple wasn&#8217;t at cebit though)! It&#8217;s a no-no for me, even though there was one thing I liked: Boot times were extremely good, less than 20 seconds on xp.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumocat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/computer_in_a_k/#comment-406373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sumocat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/computer_in_a_k#comment-406373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;Looks like a big fat notebook with no screen and no concern for energy efficiency. It better be cheap.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Looks like a big fat notebook with no screen and no concern for energy efficiency. It better be cheap.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

