Comments on: Coffee Break- Pre vs. iPhone Camera

By: Scott

Scott — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:00:26 +0000

LOL. Agree they both suck.

By: Danny

Danny — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:47:40 +0000

Did you click to see the larger versions? They both suck so, so much that “less” isn’t even relevant.

By: James Kendrick

James Kendrick — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:47:23 +0000

Nothing is off-topic in a Coffee Break post. :)

By: IronHide

IronHide — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:30:05 +0000

This has NOTHING to do with the phone cameras, I know, BUT just had to say that your comment about having so much fun using the HP Mini 1000 running Win7 made me leave my Desktop and grab my HP Mini 2140 HD ALSO running Win7!! :-)
Have to say that I am totally smitten with the 2140 w/HD screen. Currently got Win7 and UNR 9.04 running on it and am thinking about putting OSX on it using a spare hard drive I have.

Sweet little Netbook! My apologies for getting off-topic!

By: Griffon

Griffon — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:26:28 +0000

3GS camera dose a lot better then the 3g. They should have added the flash too though :p. The adjustable auto focus beats having the flash on the pre IMO. But yeah, if your used to shooting DSLR’s all day they pretty much stink.

By: HSK

HSK — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:19:56 +0000

I had a Pre and I now have a 3gs. IMO, the Pre has a better camera from a focus standpoint. All of my 3gs picts are just not as sharp but the color on both is good. Actually I am a little disappointed in the 3gs’ camera (but video is nice!).

By: Richard Garrett

Richard Garrett — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:42:29 +0000

A combination of the best of each would be better than either…the Pre, in this example, has much better depth of field (translating to superior focus) and captures off-center images better. The iPhone has better color saturation.

By: stan kramer

stan kramer — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:20:19 +0000

the Pre photo is washed out; the iPhone isn’t as bad

By: Jazz1

Jazz1 — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:50:24 +0000

But the iPhone sucks less ;)