http://gigaom.com/mobile/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:24:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://gigaom.com/mobile/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410446 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:37:18 +0000 http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/29/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410446 Incidentally MSI’s ‘Wind Netbook’ application was similarly rejected a few days earlier.

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410445 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:55:38 +0000 http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/29/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410445 Unfortunately Coby’s application was intially refused on 13 January by USPTO citing section 2(d) – likelihood of confusion with Psion’s mark #2404976 :(

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410444 Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:22:37 +0000 http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/29/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410444 Read the Wikipedia article… netbook stems from… Microsoft… aaahhhggrrr!!!!!!

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410443 Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:05:59 +0000 http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/29/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410443 Oh. Now thats an interesting new twist. :)

]]> http://gigaom.com/mobile/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410442 Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:05:56 +0000 http://jkontherun.com/2008/12/29/coby-netbook-oh-yes-they-did-apply-for-a-trademark/#comment-410442 Great, now Psion can sue them too! :-)

]]>