<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloudy Microsoft forecasts partly Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodThings2Life</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/#comment-362777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoodThings2Life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/cloudy-microsof#comment-362777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, after watching the full blown video I’ll offer this– I can see the multi-editor capabilities getting tied into SharePoint portals so that a business and client can collaborate on a document. **THAT** is incredibly useful, regardless of application.

But I&#039;m sorry... depending on a web connection to edit my documents… that still seems absurd to me, especially in a corporate environment where you’ll already have the client version installed. Nevermind the plethora of security and dependability factors involved here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, after watching the full blown video I’ll offer this– I can see the multi-editor capabilities getting tied into SharePoint portals so that a business and client can collaborate on a document. **THAT** is incredibly useful, regardless of application.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m sorry&#8230; depending on a web connection to edit my documents… that still seems absurd to me, especially in a corporate environment where you’ll already have the client version installed. Nevermind the plethora of security and dependability factors involved here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/#comment-362778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/cloudy-microsof#comment-362778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        I can understand where you&#039;re coming from, but I&#039;m envisioning the enterprise adopting this to complement their existing Office deployment. Meaning, they can get more potential productivity out of employees by allowing online document editing and creation. Some businesses simply can&#039;t embrace this due to regulatory issues, but small and medium sized businesses just might.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand where you&#8217;re coming from, but I&#8217;m envisioning the enterprise adopting this to complement their existing Office deployment. Meaning, they can get more potential productivity out of employees by allowing online document editing and creation. Some businesses simply can&#8217;t embrace this due to regulatory issues, but small and medium sized businesses just might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodThings2Life</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/#comment-362779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoodThings2Life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/cloudy-microsof#comment-362779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry, but I just don&#039;t see the enterprise moving to cloud computing anytime soon. IT Administrators like myself are already constantly struggling to keep a tight lock on our company data that there&#039;s no way we&#039;re going to collectively open the doors to cloud computing. Yeah-- let&#039;s trust Apple, Microsoft, and Google to host all of our data?! Microsoft with all there security flaws, Google with all their privacy flaws, and Apple with ridiculously hyper-controlled, overpriced solutions. No way. Never going to happen... certainly not at the hyped-up levels that tech pundits keep claiming.

I&#039;m not anti-web apps, I&#039;m just very cautious on how far I trust it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I just don&#8217;t see the enterprise moving to cloud computing anytime soon. IT Administrators like myself are already constantly struggling to keep a tight lock on our company data that there&#8217;s no way we&#8217;re going to collectively open the doors to cloud computing. Yeah&#8211; let&#8217;s trust Apple, Microsoft, and Google to host all of our data?! Microsoft with all there security flaws, Google with all their privacy flaws, and Apple with ridiculously hyper-controlled, overpriced solutions. No way. Never going to happen&#8230; certainly not at the hyped-up levels that tech pundits keep claiming.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not anti-web apps, I&#8217;m just very cautious on how far I trust it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel ION</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/#comment-362780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel ION]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/cloudy-microsof#comment-362780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        evernote is dead my friends.
excellent news for onenote.
can&#039;t wait to use it.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>evernote is dead my friends.<br />
excellent news for onenote.<br />
can&#8217;t wait to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scoobie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/cloudy-microsof/#comment-362781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scoobie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/cloudy-microsof#comment-362781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        There is a demo of Onenote on the web here, the screen resolution is a bit low I find (is there a hi res version?) but they also briefly show Onenote 14!
&lt;a href=&quot;http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/PDCNews/First-Look-Office-14-for-Web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/PDCNews/First-Look-Office-14-for-Web/&lt;/a&gt;

      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a demo of Onenote on the web here, the screen resolution is a bit low I find (is there a hi res version?) but they also briefly show Onenote 14!<br />
<a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/PDCNews/First-Look-Office-14-for-Web/" rel="nofollow">http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/PDCNews/First-Look-Office-14-for-Web/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

