<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser and device checkpoint of our readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick C.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m using Safari on Windows (XP, TabletPC Edition) as my default browser. Firefox is close second, but not my default. IE only when I really, really HAVE to...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Safari is in general the &quot;fastest&quot; of the three. FF 3 is now a very close second... but I just like the Safari UI, the look, the way bookmarks and feeds are implemented. It&#039;s a personal choice. Yes, I&#039;ve had Macs before and used Safari there, but I&#039;m Mac-less at the moment...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I&#8217;m using Safari on Windows (XP, TabletPC Edition) as my default browser. Firefox is close second, but not my default. IE only when I really, really HAVE to&#8230;</p>
<p>Safari is in general the &#8220;fastest&#8221; of the three. FF 3 is now a very close second&#8230; but I just like the Safari UI, the look, the way bookmarks and feeds are implemented. It&#8217;s a personal choice. Yes, I&#8217;ve had Macs before and used Safari there, but I&#8217;m Mac-less at the moment&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vm-01</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vm-01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I would only use Opera if it weren&#039;t for the random google errors.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I would only use Opera if it weren&#8217;t for the random google errors.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;cr0ft: Opera accounts for 3.33% of our readers. Of that number, over half are using Opera 9.2x. Only 13% of the readers using Opera are on 9.5.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave, if James and I account for &quot;10% of our readers&quot;, there&#039;s a BIG problem. ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>cr0ft: Opera accounts for 3.33% of our readers. Of that number, over half are using Opera 9.2x. Only 13% of the readers using Opera are on 9.5.</p>
<p>Dave, if James and I account for &#8220;10% of our readers&#8221;, there&#8217;s a BIG problem. ;)</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Zatz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Safari browsing of your site has probably gone up since you guys joined the cult... ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I&#039;ve been using Firefox since before there was a v1. There&#039;s been a few bumps along the way, but it&#039;s still my browser or choice. I&#039;m running RC3 at the moment, which wasn&#039;t as good as RC1. Suppose I&#039;ll get out of beta today or tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Safari browsing of your site has probably gone up since you guys joined the cult&#8230; ;)</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ve been using Firefox since before there was a v1. There&#8217;s been a few bumps along the way, but it&#8217;s still my browser or choice. I&#8217;m running RC3 at the moment, which wasn&#8217;t as good as RC1. Suppose I&#8217;ll get out of beta today or tomorrow.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cr0ft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cr0ft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;So what you&#039;re saying is that there are still a distressing percentage of poor souls who haven&#039;t discovered Opera 9.5? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>So what you&#8217;re saying is that there are still a distressing percentage of poor souls who haven&#8217;t discovered Opera 9.5? ;)</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;georgi55: around 12% of our readership is Mac, so I think the Safari number isn&#039;t heavily influenced by Apple&#039;s attempt to get Safari on Windows devices. Besides, just having Safari installed (even if the user didn&#039;t initiate it) wouldn&#039;t count in these stats. The users would have to actually use Safari to hit the site, which is a conscious choice.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>georgi55: around 12% of our readership is Mac, so I think the Safari number isn&#8217;t heavily influenced by Apple&#8217;s attempt to get Safari on Windows devices. Besides, just having Safari installed (even if the user didn&#8217;t initiate it) wouldn&#8217;t count in these stats. The users would have to actually use Safari to hit the site, which is a conscious choice.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgi55</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[georgi55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;There was the hijack of Safari on windows through iTunes update so maybe that&#039;s another reason safari reached 10%.&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>There was the hijack of Safari on windows through iTunes update so maybe that&#8217;s another reason safari reached 10%.</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Dixon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/browser-and-dev/#comment-369597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Dixon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2008/06/18/browser-and-dev#comment-369597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;div xmlns=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&quot;&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;I am getting 61% on IE and over 50% on Vista but I will make sure I still cater for my one Windows ME reader :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
      &lt;/div&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I am getting 61% on IE and over 50% on Vista but I will make sure I still cater for my one Windows ME reader :)
</p>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

