<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry Storm 2 Rumored for Verizon This Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/blackberry-storm-2-rumored-for-verizon-this-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/blackberry-storm-2-rumored-for-verizon-this-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/blackberry-storm-2-rumored-for-verizon-this-year/#comment-415730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ignar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/07/blackberry-storm-2-rumored-for-verizon-this-year/#comment-415730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure how current Storm users feel about it. I would not be very happy unless there is a good upgrade promo. In any case, this news shows Storm was rushed to the market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how current Storm users feel about it. I would not be very happy unless there is a good upgrade promo. In any case, this news shows Storm was rushed to the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Brady</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/blackberry-storm-2-rumored-for-verizon-this-year/#comment-415729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Brady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.com/2009/04/07/blackberry-storm-2-rumored-for-verizon-this-year/#comment-415729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sort of understand why At&amp;T and Verizon are worried about VoiP and other bandwidth intensive apps on the 3G network, but I wish that they would make it a consumer decision.  Some of us might be willing to pay for a high bandwidth account which would allow Skype and Sling access on the storm.  

I pay 15.00 a month now for 5 GB of tethered access which I used last night to stream a video from Amazon to my EEE PC.  Skype is not so nice on the EEE pc this way, but it is passable in a pinch.  I have watched my Sling over 3G via the EEE PC as well.

They let me pay for the access this way, i wish they would let me pay to access these apps of the 3G network as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of understand why At&amp;T and Verizon are worried about VoiP and other bandwidth intensive apps on the 3G network, but I wish that they would make it a consumer decision.  Some of us might be willing to pay for a high bandwidth account which would allow Skype and Sling access on the storm.  </p>
<p>I pay 15.00 a month now for 5 GB of tethered access which I used last night to stream a video from Amazon to my EEE PC.  Skype is not so nice on the EEE pc this way, but it is passable in a pinch.  I have watched my Sling over 3G via the EEE PC as well.</p>
<p>They let me pay for the access this way, i wish they would let me pay to access these apps of the 3G network as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

