<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battery Eater results on the Samsung Q1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffGr</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JeffGr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night, I ran this same test using my eo v7110 (Amtek t700) and got a result of 1:35:02 with wi-fi and Bluetooth on.  That is only 7 minutes more than what JKK got, but it does suggest that there are probably some variations in these devices.  

It would be interesting to see more people reporting the results of this test to see what the averages are for the various models.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night, I ran this same test using my eo v7110 (Amtek t700) and got a result of 1:35:02 with wi-fi and Bluetooth on.  That is only 7 minutes more than what JKK got, but it does suggest that there are probably some variations in these devices.  </p>
<p>It would be interesting to see more people reporting the results of this test to see what the averages are for the various models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKK</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JKK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Amtek t700 results, wifi off:
Total time 1:39:56

      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Amtek t700 results, wifi off:<br />
Total time 1:39:56</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Gisburne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stu Gisburne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Ok ok....I&#039;ll download BatteryEater and do it. I have an extended battery. Comes in mighty handy at times. Even fits in the executive case with keyboard. I&#039;m with you on the keyboard though. I wish it was Bluetooooooooooooooooooth. Whoops, my fingers slipped. Off to wash my hands first.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Ok ok&#8230;.I&#8217;ll download BatteryEater and do it. I have an extended battery. Comes in mighty handy at times. Even fits in the executive case with keyboard. I&#8217;m with you on the keyboard though. I wish it was Bluetooooooooooooooooooth. Whoops, my fingers slipped. Off to wash my hands first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Thanks Ken! I may have to take you up on that; perhaps we&#039;ll do a Philly area &quot;geek out&quot;. :)
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Thanks Ken! I may have to take you up on that; perhaps we&#8217;ll do a Philly area &#8220;geek out&#8221;. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Stu, I have two external Universal LiON batteries, one is 118 W/hr and one is 130 W/hr. I&#039;d have to test these overnight because I can get a full day out of these.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Stu, I have two external Universal LiON batteries, one is 118 W/hr and one is 130 W/hr. I&#8217;d have to test these overnight because I can get a full day out of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Gisburne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stu Gisburne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Kevin, I thought you had an extended battery. Can you test it too. I am eating a SlimJim and don&#039;t want to get my keyboard all greasy.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Kevin, I thought you had an extended battery. Can you test it too. I am eating a SlimJim and don&#8217;t want to get my keyboard all greasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Siegel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Siegel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Kevin,
I live in the Philadelphia area so you are always welcome to take a look at the Q1 ith the extended battery.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        Kevin,<br />
I live in the Philadelphia area so you are always welcome to take a look at the Q1 ith the extended battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Siegel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Siegel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The extended life battery from Samsung Parts will give you at least 5-5.5 hours of use.  It does add about 2 inches of height to the Q1 but you don&#039;t really notice it.  It also makes it slightly heavier, but again not significant.  The stand still works as well.

Ken siegel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extended life battery from Samsung Parts will give you at least 5-5.5 hours of use.  It does add about 2 inches of height to the Q1 but you don&#8217;t really notice it.  It also makes it slightly heavier, but again not significant.  The stand still works as well.</p>
<p>Ken siegel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton P. Nym</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton P. Nym]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, score one for truth in advertising.  Samsung quoted a 1:40 battery life when watching video on the Q1... 1:45 without the wi-fi seems to match with that fairly closely.

Myself, I tend to get 2.5 - 3 hours of use from a charge but that&#039;s usually without the wi-fi radio for half that time and with close (manual) adjustments of the screen brightness down to minimal level that&#039;s still comfortable.

 -- Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, score one for truth in advertising.  Samsung quoted a 1:40 battery life when watching video on the Q1&#8230; 1:45 without the wi-fi seems to match with that fairly closely.</p>
<p>Myself, I tend to get 2.5 &#8211; 3 hours of use from a charge but that&#8217;s usually without the wi-fi radio for half that time and with close (manual) adjustments of the screen brightness down to minimal level that&#8217;s still comfortable.</p>
<p> &#8212; Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ctitanic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/battery_eater_r/#comment-47106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ctitanic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/battery_eater_r#comment-47106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        That&#039;s a good test. I think that after you repeat your test with WiFi ON you should get the 10% difference between these two devices or at least a very close number to 10.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>        That&#8217;s a good test. I think that after you repeat your test with WiFi ON you should get the 10% difference between these two devices or at least a very close number to 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

