<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple putting Merom in MacBooks and MacBook Pros next month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MooseMoose</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MooseMoose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 04:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUOTE:
The only reason MacBook Pro&#039;s were faster at running than other laptops at running windows was because they were one of the few manufacturers with the Core2 proc in their laptops at the time. A lot has changed since The MacBook Pro rolled out and I doubt that is still a true statement.
:END QUOTE

Actually, no, you&#039;re wrong. Core2 hasn&#039;t reached the MB/MBP range yet, as you&#039;ll notice from this article, which is actually stating that Merom (codename for Core2) may go in the machines this month. And nothing&#039;s really changed - show me a dual core laptop running faster than a 2.16Ghz MBP and a real world test showing it running faster, and I&#039;ll believe you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE:<br />
The only reason MacBook Pro&#8217;s were faster at running than other laptops at running windows was because they were one of the few manufacturers with the Core2 proc in their laptops at the time. A lot has changed since The MacBook Pro rolled out and I doubt that is still a true statement.<br />
:END QUOTE</p>
<p>Actually, no, you&#8217;re wrong. Core2 hasn&#8217;t reached the MB/MBP range yet, as you&#8217;ll notice from this article, which is actually stating that Merom (codename for Core2) may go in the machines this month. And nothing&#8217;s really changed &#8211; show me a dual core laptop running faster than a 2.16Ghz MBP and a real world test showing it running faster, and I&#8217;ll believe you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        no enough for K8L Mobile
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no enough for K8L Mobile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Gabel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. Gabel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason MacBook Pro&#039;s were faster at running than other laptops at running windows was because they were one of the few manufacturers with the Core2 proc in their laptops at the time. A lot has changed since The MacBook Pro rolled out and I doubt that is still a true statement. The MBP would make a pretty cruddy tablet as the screen doesn&#039;t flip around so you can hold it in the tablet fashion...

Tablets are usually slower because they use Intel&#039;s ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processors. The clock speed tends to be significantly slower than the normal mobile procs... but it actually gives you the battery life you need for a Tablet application. I guess I haven&#039;t dealt with tablets in day to day use but I thought a 1 - 1.5GHZ pentum M would be fast enough to run OneNote... is that not so?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason MacBook Pro&#8217;s were faster at running than other laptops at running windows was because they were one of the few manufacturers with the Core2 proc in their laptops at the time. A lot has changed since The MacBook Pro rolled out and I doubt that is still a true statement. The MBP would make a pretty cruddy tablet as the screen doesn&#8217;t flip around so you can hold it in the tablet fashion&#8230;</p>
<p>Tablets are usually slower because they use Intel&#8217;s ULV (Ultra Low Voltage) processors. The clock speed tends to be significantly slower than the normal mobile procs&#8230; but it actually gives you the battery life you need for a Tablet application. I guess I haven&#8217;t dealt with tablets in day to day use but I thought a 1 &#8211; 1.5GHZ pentum M would be fast enough to run OneNote&#8230; is that not so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Williams</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B. Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To fury: can&#039;t do that. Tablet PC Edition isn&#039;t just XP Pro on drugs. It has a special set of hardware requirements that the computer has to meet (for example, there&#039;s a requirement for a hardware key mapped to CTRL-ALT-Delete.)

Would be nice, but no such luck. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To fury: can&#8217;t do that. Tablet PC Edition isn&#8217;t just XP Pro on drugs. It has a special set of hardware requirements that the computer has to meet (for example, there&#8217;s a requirement for a hardware key mapped to CTRL-ALT-Delete.)</p>
<p>Would be nice, but no such luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fury</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the MacBooks are using Intel processors, has anyone gotten the idea to try and put a touchscreen or tablet on one and install XP Tablet PC Edition?

I hear the Macs run Windows a lot faster than most PCs... might be interesting to see a fast tablet]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the MacBooks are using Intel processors, has anyone gotten the idea to try and put a touchscreen or tablet on one and install XP Tablet PC Edition?</p>
<p>I hear the Macs run Windows a lot faster than most PCs&#8230; might be interesting to see a fast tablet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My MacBook sucks and I am returning it</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My MacBook sucks and I am returning it]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rumor: Apple to add 64-bit Merom chips to MacBook Pro Soon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_putting_m/#comment-46789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rumor: Apple to add 64-bit Merom chips to MacBook Pro Soon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/08/11/apple_putting_m#comment-46789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

