<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple on-screen keyboard patent opens UMPC possibilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_onscreen_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_onscreen_/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Daly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_onscreen_/#comment-43401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Daly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/apple_onscreen_#comment-43401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        The ultra-mobile PC platform concept is primarily for consumers, it doesn&#039;t *have* to have any productive use. People just have to want it.
If Apple produce a UMPC-like device I see 2 possible outcomes (OK, there are others, but I just want to talk about these two):
1) Apple comes to dominate the market and everyone else is squeezed out. That would be bad, both for consumers and for developers.
2) The presence of at least 2 competing platforms in the market spurs innovation and creates downward pressure on price. Within a year or so, a consensus minimal feature set emerges based on what people actually want and find easy to use. This reflects the experience in the palm-top market, where the presence of both Palm and Pocket PC/Windows Mobile has led to better devices than we would have seen if either had been absent. 
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ultra-mobile PC platform concept is primarily for consumers, it doesn&#8217;t *have* to have any productive use. People just have to want it.<br />
If Apple produce a UMPC-like device I see 2 possible outcomes (OK, there are others, but I just want to talk about these two):<br />
1) Apple comes to dominate the market and everyone else is squeezed out. That would be bad, both for consumers and for developers.<br />
2) The presence of at least 2 competing platforms in the market spurs innovation and creates downward pressure on price. Within a year or so, a consensus minimal feature set emerges based on what people actually want and find easy to use. This reflects the experience in the palm-top market, where the presence of both Palm and Pocket PC/Windows Mobile has led to better devices than we would have seen if either had been absent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Jansen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_onscreen_/#comment-43402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Jansen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/apple_onscreen_#comment-43402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt Apple will even consider something like an UMPC, as it&#039;s simply not a device that is good for any productive use. It&#039;s most likely a tablet-style computer (maybe even hybrid).

One question to you Joe, why would a iPod video require a keyboard? We all know that iPod is well-known for the fact that there is almost no interaction whatsoever, besides the obvious play/pause/etc. controls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Apple will even consider something like an UMPC, as it&#8217;s simply not a device that is good for any productive use. It&#8217;s most likely a tablet-style computer (maybe even hybrid).</p>
<p>One question to you Joe, why would a iPod video require a keyboard? We all know that iPod is well-known for the fact that there is almost no interaction whatsoever, besides the obvious play/pause/etc. controls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/apple_onscreen_/#comment-43403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/04/20/apple_onscreen_#comment-43403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        now this is getting interesting, but my gutt feeling is that its for their tablet or the rumoured iPod Video
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now this is getting interesting, but my gutt feeling is that its for their tablet or the rumoured iPod Video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

