<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Active vs. touch: what I learned at CES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Cane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt;&gt;I would love to get a lifebook 1610 but it&#039;s just too expensive for the underpowered hardware.

Hmmm... what do you think of price/benefit ratios of OQO  M2, Q1, Vega?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;I would love to get a lifebook 1610 but it&#8217;s just too expensive for the underpowered hardware.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; what do you think of price/benefit ratios of OQO  M2, Q1, Vega?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Tony, if an active digitizer works for you, then it&#039;s the right choice. There&#039;s no right or wrong here because personal computing is a personal decision. The only thought I&#039;ll leave you with is on your statement &quot;the delicate accuracy of the active digitize is so superior when taking notes.&quot; If you have the opportunity, give the P1610 a try and take some notes on it. It has the high res screen with palm rejection and I found the digitizer to be stellar. Thanks for the comments!
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, if an active digitizer works for you, then it&#8217;s the right choice. There&#8217;s no right or wrong here because personal computing is a personal decision. The only thought I&#8217;ll leave you with is on your statement &#8220;the delicate accuracy of the active digitize is so superior when taking notes.&#8221; If you have the opportunity, give the P1610 a try and take some notes on it. It has the high res screen with palm rejection and I found the digitizer to be stellar. Thanks for the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony M.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin,

I typically love your analysis but I couldn&#039;t disagree with you more.  I could never imagine switching to a touchscreen - the delicate accuracy of the active digitizer is so superior when taking notes.  Now layer in the need for writing even smaller on a 7&quot;,  1024x600 screen (or 800x480 screen as the case may be) vs. the 12.1&quot;, 1400x1050 screen on my M200 and I&#039;m completely convinced that the active digitizer is my only solution.  On my LS800, I couldn&#039;t imagine finding any use for it if I weren&#039;t able to take such fine detail notes.

Of course, I don&#039;t really take notes so mobile.  I just walk from conference room to conference room and plop down for an hour or two at a time.  For the impromtu meetings, I keep a fully charged LS800 in standby mode nearby at all times and use the new features of Onenote 12 to keep the two devices synced.  And if I&#039;m in a real crunch, I just kick on mvoice on my treo which is always in my pocket and take notes on paper and then scan them in and add the audio notes back into OneNote at the end of the day (both my M200 and LS800 have SD slots - I don&#039;t think there are any UMPCs with SD slots but I could be wrong).

Anyhow, it is unfair that my only post here be a rant - natural selection I guess.  I never feel the urge to post how much I agree with you on other topics; a situation that happens a lot more regularly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I typically love your analysis but I couldn&#8217;t disagree with you more.  I could never imagine switching to a touchscreen &#8211; the delicate accuracy of the active digitizer is so superior when taking notes.  Now layer in the need for writing even smaller on a 7&#8243;,  1024&#215;600 screen (or 800&#215;480 screen as the case may be) vs. the 12.1&#8243;, 1400&#215;1050 screen on my M200 and I&#8217;m completely convinced that the active digitizer is my only solution.  On my LS800, I couldn&#8217;t imagine finding any use for it if I weren&#8217;t able to take such fine detail notes.</p>
<p>Of course, I don&#8217;t really take notes so mobile.  I just walk from conference room to conference room and plop down for an hour or two at a time.  For the impromtu meetings, I keep a fully charged LS800 in standby mode nearby at all times and use the new features of Onenote 12 to keep the two devices synced.  And if I&#8217;m in a real crunch, I just kick on mvoice on my treo which is always in my pocket and take notes on paper and then scan them in and add the audio notes back into OneNote at the end of the day (both my M200 and LS800 have SD slots &#8211; I don&#8217;t think there are any UMPCs with SD slots but I could be wrong).</p>
<p>Anyhow, it is unfair that my only post here be a rant &#8211; natural selection I guess.  I never feel the urge to post how much I agree with you on other topics; a situation that happens a lot more regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ignar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        I hear you, Kevin. That is exactly how I feel about active screen and larger laptops compared to my Q1, and that&#039;s the reason I&#039;m parting with my good old Fujitsu P7120, HP 4200, and NEC Litepad in favor of Q1. I don&#039;t have plan to replace Q1 any time soon, but if I get a new laptop, it must meet following 3 conditions: Passive sensitive(I didn&#039;t like R2H screen) touch screen, Slate, and Less than 2 lbs. 
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you, Kevin. That is exactly how I feel about active screen and larger laptops compared to my Q1, and that&#8217;s the reason I&#8217;m parting with my good old Fujitsu P7120, HP 4200, and NEC Litepad in favor of Q1. I don&#8217;t have plan to replace Q1 any time soon, but if I get a new laptop, it must meet following 3 conditions: Passive sensitive(I didn&#8217;t like R2H screen) touch screen, Slate, and Less than 2 lbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Any idea when Fujitsu will upgrade the lifebook 1610 to be Vista Premium ready?  There&#039;s been all this talk about new products at CES but nothing to compare or compete with the lifebook 1610.  I would love to get a lifebook 1610 but it&#039;s just too expensive for the underpowered hardware.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea when Fujitsu will upgrade the lifebook 1610 to be Vista Premium ready?  There&#8217;s been all this talk about new products at CES but nothing to compare or compete with the lifebook 1610.  I would love to get a lifebook 1610 but it&#8217;s just too expensive for the underpowered hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Anderson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Anderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        In my experience the touchscreen on the Asus R2H is better at inking than the Q1, but not as good as the Q1 for touch interaction. I&#039;d like to have a UMPC that has both a great inking experience and the ability to use the touch interface. Either that or I am going to have to stop biting my fingernails.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience the touchscreen on the Asus R2H is better at inking than the Q1, but not as good as the Q1 for touch interaction. I&#8217;d like to have a UMPC that has both a great inking experience and the ability to use the touch interface. Either that or I am going to have to stop biting my fingernails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Duncan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Duncan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Does this mean you&#039;d go for a larger UMPC over the OQO 02 because of the screen? How would the OQO 02 compare in your opinion?
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean you&#8217;d go for a larger UMPC over the OQO 02 because of the screen? How would the OQO 02 compare in your opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Easton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evan Easton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never used an active digitizer for any length of time.  But when I got my UMPC (and eo i7210) several months ago, it was only a week before I found myself accidentally touching the screens on my laptop and my Mac flat panel to make things happen. :D

When you can touch the screen with your finger, or even a stylus, doing things the old fashion way doesn&#039;t measure up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never used an active digitizer for any length of time.  But when I got my UMPC (and eo i7210) several months ago, it was only a week before I found myself accidentally touching the screens on my laptop and my Mac flat panel to make things happen. :D</p>
<p>When you can touch the screen with your finger, or even a stylus, doing things the old fashion way doesn&#8217;t measure up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
        Passive digitizer (touchscreen) = no pressure sensitivity.
      ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passive digitizer (touchscreen) = no pressure sensitivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Lopez</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/active_vs_touch/#comment-50479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos Lopez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2007/01/11/active_vs_touch#comment-50479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey pipol!!

Nice CES&#039; coverage :) I enjoyed the iPhone article. I must have one of them.

I have a question about active digitizer and the touchscreen. I just received my ASUS R2H, (by the way it&#039;s an amazing device, only waiting for SS hard disk to change it).

I installed an application for drawing that used to accept different levels of pressure in my old tablet (an active digitizer), in the ASUS I can&#039;t get this different levels for painting or drawing in this app.

Is the pressure and sensitive levels something that I trade (lost) with this new ASUS?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey pipol!!</p>
<p>Nice CES&#8217; coverage :) I enjoyed the iPhone article. I must have one of them.</p>
<p>I have a question about active digitizer and the touchscreen. I just received my ASUS R2H, (by the way it&#8217;s an amazing device, only waiting for SS hard disk to change it).</p>
<p>I installed an application for drawing that used to accept different levels of pressure in my old tablet (an active digitizer), in the ASUS I can&#8217;t get this different levels for painting or drawing in this app.</p>
<p>Is the pressure and sensitive levels something that I trade (lost) with this new ASUS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

