<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $100 laptop and power requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/mobile/100_laptop_and_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/100_laptop_and_/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Juhl Jensen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/100_laptop_and_/#comment-46405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lars Juhl Jensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/100_laptop_and_#comment-46405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would seem that the information has been slowly degrading by blogs citing blogs. If you go back to the original article from Technology Review, it states:

&quot;To reach the project&#039;s goal of one minute of power generation for every ten minutes of laptop use, the generator would need to produce 20 watts (the laptop will require less than two watts in a primary application as an electronic textbook replacement).&quot;

The generator can thus produce 20 watts if used continuously. The computer itself uses only 2 watts as compared to the 9 to 11 watts for the Q1.

So to answer your question: yes, you could charge your Q1 battery to 66% with one of these string chargers. However, it would require that you keep pulling the string for a full hour. Doesn&#039;t sound like a lot of fun to me ... yet it might be better than having to watch the in-flight entertainment ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that the information has been slowly degrading by blogs citing blogs. If you go back to the original article from Technology Review, it states:</p>
<p>&#8220;To reach the project&#8217;s goal of one minute of power generation for every ten minutes of laptop use, the generator would need to produce 20 watts (the laptop will require less than two watts in a primary application as an electronic textbook replacement).&#8221;</p>
<p>The generator can thus produce 20 watts if used continuously. The computer itself uses only 2 watts as compared to the 9 to 11 watts for the Q1.</p>
<p>So to answer your question: yes, you could charge your Q1 battery to 66% with one of these string chargers. However, it would require that you keep pulling the string for a full hour. Doesn&#8217;t sound like a lot of fun to me &#8230; yet it might be better than having to watch the in-flight entertainment ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/mobile/100_laptop_and_/#comment-46406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jkontherun.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/100_laptop_and_#comment-46406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

