<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Suffer from L.E.S. - The Rypple Effect</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Suffer from L.E.S. - The Rypple Effect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] you who have confronted your problem and have undertaken a series of resolutions, challenges, and strategies to deal with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you who have confronted your problem and have undertaken a series of resolutions, challenges, and strategies to deal with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Tips for Writing Effective Email&#160;&#124;&#160;Desi Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[15 Tips for Writing Effective Email&#160;&#124;&#160;Desi Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Anne Zelenka: Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anne Zelenka: Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 15 Tips for Writing Effective Email &#124; ThinkSimpleNow.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[15 Tips for Writing Effective Email &#124; ThinkSimpleNow.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Anne Zelenka: Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anne Zelenka: Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With degrees in literature and law allow me to weigh in --- first, this article could have been improved with editing, both as to length and tone.  Second, you miss the point of communication: understand your audience, respect their intelligence, and their needs or contraints, and target your message in a manner that accomplishes your purpose.  Brevity and clarity are important, but they are no pre-eminent in all cases, as many of the other posters have acknowledged.  Composition, whether for business or personal communication, is an art.  Practice until you are an artist skilled in every medium, and your message will never be questioned, or lost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With degrees in literature and law allow me to weigh in &#8212; first, this article could have been improved with editing, both as to length and tone.  Second, you miss the point of communication: understand your audience, respect their intelligence, and their needs or contraints, and target your message in a manner that accomplishes your purpose.  Brevity and clarity are important, but they are no pre-eminent in all cases, as many of the other posters have acknowledged.  Composition, whether for business or personal communication, is an art.  Practice until you are an artist skilled in every medium, and your message will never be questioned, or lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend links wrap-up&#8230; - My Worklog -</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weekend links wrap-up&#8230; - My Worklog -]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaidimai</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaidimai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DRJ11 please write more information about it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DRJ11 please write more information about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 Rules for Communicating Clearly and Concisely in Email[原文] &#171; All Small Things That Matter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[7 Rules for Communicating Clearly and Concisely in Email[原文] &#171; All Small Things That Matter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] aren’t interested. They just want to know what you want. So state that, in the first sentence. Skip the niceties. Don’t make the recipient wade through 10 paragraphs to find what action is needed for the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] aren’t interested. They just want to know what you want. So state that, in the first sentence. Skip the niceties. Don’t make the recipient wade through 10 paragraphs to find what action is needed for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rising Email Immunity Leads to Conflict over Email Etiquette &#171; Web Worker Daily</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rising Email Immunity Leads to Conflict over Email Etiquette &#171; Web Worker Daily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to suggestions that you might worry less about responding to email or leave your inbox full or prioritize brevity over niceties. At the same time, those with more immunity question lengthy email discussions, complex email [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to suggestions that you might worry less about responding to email or leave your inbox full or prioritize brevity over niceties. At the same time, those with more immunity question lengthy email discussions, complex email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discardia &#187; Email lengths</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[discardia &#187; Email lengths]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] also see this: Everyone’s so worried about offending by email that they try to make it more human and more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also see this: Everyone’s so worried about offending by email that they try to make it more human and more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manage Your Writing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manage Your Writing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Nice Can Be Short&lt;/strong&gt;

A posting on Web Worker Daily is provocatively titled Why Emails Should Be Short instead of Nice. That&#039;s a false dichotomy. Short IS nice. An important way to be kind to your readers is to not waste their time. And]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nice Can Be Short</strong></p>
<p>A posting on Web Worker Daily is provocatively titled Why Emails Should Be Short instead of Nice. That&#8217;s a false dichotomy. Short IS nice. An important way to be kind to your readers is to not waste their time. And</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew&#8217;s Autoblog Experiment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Let that be the problem</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew&#8217;s Autoblog Experiment &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Let that be the problem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] members of the blogocracy whining about the amount of time that supporting their fame costs them. Hundreds of emails a day, hours spent moderating comments, it seems that &#8220;I&#8217;m far too busy&#8221; is the new [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] members of the blogocracy whining about the amount of time that supporting their fame costs them. Hundreds of emails a day, hours spent moderating comments, it seems that &ldquo;I&rsquo;m far too busy&rdquo; is the new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let that be the problem at Facibus On Blogging</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Let that be the problem at Facibus On Blogging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] members of the blogocracy whining about the amount of time that supporting their fame costs them. Hundreds of emails a day, hours spent moderating comments, it seems that &#8220;I&#8217;m far too busy&#8221; is the new [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] members of the blogocracy whining about the amount of time that supporting their fame costs them. Hundreds of emails a day, hours spent moderating comments, it seems that &#8220;I&#8217;m far too busy&#8221; is the new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Pierce</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[担心所写的邮件让人反感，以致于他们会以效率为代价把邮件写得更人性化、更友好，这样就不会增加过多的重复邮件。简短爽快的邮件以及回复让人印象深刻，有研究也表明了，简单扼要的信息]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>担心所写的邮件让人反感，以致于他们会以效率为代价把邮件写得更人性化、更友好，这样就不会增加过多的重复邮件。简短爽快的邮件以及回复让人印象深刻，有研究也表明了，简单扼要的信息</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tl;dr.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tl;dr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, clear writing will never be out of style because it serves a purpose.  That doesn&#039;t imply that it has to be overly-friendly.

Poor writing often reflects poor thinking and can require extra work just to determine what is meant.  I worked for a company that used short, quick notes via e-mail.  I found that they often had to be retracted or clarifying e-mails had to be sent so people could understand the first one.

E-mail may not require the same formality as written letters, but like letters, they can be easily archived.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, clear writing will never be out of style because it serves a purpose.  That doesn&#8217;t imply that it has to be overly-friendly.</p>
<p>Poor writing often reflects poor thinking and can require extra work just to determine what is meant.  I worked for a company that used short, quick notes via e-mail.  I found that they often had to be retracted or clarifying e-mails had to be sent so people could understand the first one.</p>
<p>E-mail may not require the same formality as written letters, but like letters, they can be easily archived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts from around WordPress.com &#171; The TOP BLOGS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top Posts from around WordPress.com &#171; The TOP BLOGS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/03/why-emails-should-be-short-instead-of-nice/#comment-61086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Emails Should be Short Instead of Nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

