<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/weekend-reader-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/weekend-reader-27/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe J DEWOST</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe J DEWOST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/27/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To add to this constructive debate, there might be a way to avoid the e-mail resizing limitation on the iPhone, and it is by using a little iPhone app called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tuaw.com/2007/09/11/iphone-101-uploading-your-pictures-to-flickr-and-printing-sites/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SendPics&lt;/a&gt;.

What it does is picking any pending image that you shot and adding it to an e-mail without resizing it.

Though it works one image at a time, you can still recombine the result on Qipit.com by using our newly introduced &quot;merge&quot; function.

Hope this helps.

PS: For those who&#039;d like to check the quality of an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qipit.com/public/pdewost/iphone_qipit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iPhone made qipit copy&lt;/a&gt;, we really recommend trying it by yourself :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to this constructive debate, there might be a way to avoid the e-mail resizing limitation on the iPhone, and it is by using a little iPhone app called <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/09/11/iphone-101-uploading-your-pictures-to-flickr-and-printing-sites/" rel="nofollow">SendPics</a>.</p>
<p>What it does is picking any pending image that you shot and adding it to an e-mail without resizing it.</p>
<p>Though it works one image at a time, you can still recombine the result on Qipit.com by using our newly introduced &#8220;merge&#8221; function.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>PS: For those who&#8217;d like to check the quality of an <a href="http://www.qipit.com/public/pdewost/iphone_qipit" rel="nofollow">iPhone made qipit copy</a>, we really recommend trying it by yourself :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benoit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benoit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/27/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P.S.: Andrew, the iPhone works great with Qipit on whiteboard, etc. However:
- it does not have an autofocus lens, so it is not going to improve your scanning of close-up documents
- its email client reduces images to a small size, thus killing the benefits of oits 2 mega pixel camera for uses such as mobile scanning with scanr (or qipit). The alternative is to upload the full resolution images (through iTunes / iPhoto) to a computer and email to -- or upload from -- the service.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.: Andrew, the iPhone works great with Qipit on whiteboard, etc. However:<br />
- it does not have an autofocus lens, so it is not going to improve your scanning of close-up documents<br />
- its email client reduces images to a small size, thus killing the benefits of oits 2 mega pixel camera for uses such as mobile scanning with scanr (or qipit). The alternative is to upload the full resolution images (through iTunes / iPhoto) to a computer and email to &#8212; or upload from &#8212; the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benoit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benoit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/27/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew,

High resolution, you are right, but also a camera with an autofocus. The issue when shooting a business card is that you need to get very close to the document, much closer than the minimal focus distance of these fixed-focus lenses (typically manufactured with a focus range of 3 ft - infinite).

Hint 1: try to take the picture form further away, you might be suprised by the improvement in the resulting quality

Hint 2: try to use www.qipit.com. We have been told by a number of users that our algorithms did a better job making text out on highly blurred images

Hint 3: if resolution is indeed a problem and you don&#039;t have a 2 mega pixel camera (as required by the scanr service), try qipit with a 1 mega pixel camera.

I am very interested in your comments if you do try qipit as an alternative. We strive on constructive feedback!

Benoit (qipit)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>High resolution, you are right, but also a camera with an autofocus. The issue when shooting a business card is that you need to get very close to the document, much closer than the minimal focus distance of these fixed-focus lenses (typically manufactured with a focus range of 3 ft &#8211; infinite).</p>
<p>Hint 1: try to take the picture form further away, you might be suprised by the improvement in the resulting quality</p>
<p>Hint 2: try to use <a href="http://www.qipit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.qipit.com</a>. We have been told by a number of users that our algorithms did a better job making text out on highly blurred images</p>
<p>Hint 3: if resolution is indeed a problem and you don&#8217;t have a 2 mega pixel camera (as required by the scanr service), try qipit with a 1 mega pixel camera.</p>
<p>I am very interested in your comments if you do try qipit as an alternative. We strive on constructive feedback!</p>
<p>Benoit (qipit)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Flusche</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Flusche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/10/27/weekend-reader-27/#comment-65336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ScanR is a great concept, but you do need a high resolution camera.  My cheap Samsung cell phone doesn&#039;t cut it.  I can photograph a document or business card and send it in, but ScanR just can&#039;t make out the text.

Hmmm... another reason to get an iPhone.  :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ScanR is a great concept, but you do need a high resolution camera.  My cheap Samsung cell phone doesn&#8217;t cut it.  I can photograph a document or business card and send it in, but ScanR just can&#8217;t make out the text.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; another reason to get an iPhone.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

