<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unveiling Web Worker Daily&#039;s New Look!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Eric Gruber</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Eric Gruber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jeff_ wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUsually I’m all for a redesign, but I’m deeply saddened to see the old look go. What first drew me to WWD was the bourgeois look and tie-in with the name. I don’t really get that with this design. Not that it’sa bad design; &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff_ wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUsually I’m all for a redesign, but I’m deeply saddened to see the old look go. What first drew me to WWD was the bourgeois look and tie-in with the name. I don’t really get that with this design. Not that it’sa bad design; &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Noel Hurtley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by Noel Hurtley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] sbanboy wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptNeeds some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sbanboy wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptNeeds some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Latest Premieres &#38; Debuts &#187; Comment on Unveiling Web Worker Daily’s New Look! by &#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWe have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and […] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWe have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and […] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syahidali</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[syahidali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like i am at a fallout fan site (which is a good thing!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like i am at a fallout fan site (which is a good thing!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily Gets A Makeover Too - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebWorkerDaily Gets A Makeover Too - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]   We have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   We have been busy this weekend, rolling out new designs. In addition to this blog, WebWorkerDaily got a big makeover too. ACS did the design for WWD. Thanks guys for all your hard work. New WWD is wider, cleaner and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foofy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foofy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Kebb: Opera is my primary browser and I don&#039;t see a problem with the right-hand column.  What version are you using?

-- Foofy (Webmaster, GigaOM)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Kebb: Opera is my primary browser and I don&#8217;t see a problem with the right-hand column.  What version are you using?</p>
<p>&#8211; Foofy (Webmaster, GigaOM)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time for a makeover? &#171; Market Like You Mean It</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Time for a makeover? &#171; Market Like You Mean It]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of my head, I can think of MSNBC.com, Amazon.com, Barnes &amp; Noble, Freelance Switch, GigaOM and Web Worker Daily that have recently redesigned (or realigned for those in the know). I&#8217;ve also heard rumors [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of my head, I can think of MSNBC.com, Amazon.com, Barnes &amp; Noble, Freelance Switch, GigaOM and Web Worker Daily that have recently redesigned (or realigned for those in the know). I&#8217;ve also heard rumors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The redesign looks awesome, but what&#039;s up with all the irritating space at the top? The page doesn&#039;t really look good until I scroll two bumps on my scroll wheel. Then the logo is at the top and the ad and other nav is gone. (I wonder if there&#039;s a way to make it so Firefox always scrolls down on the site.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The redesign looks awesome, but what&#8217;s up with all the irritating space at the top? The page doesn&#8217;t really look good until I scroll two bumps on my scroll wheel. Then the logo is at the top and the ad and other nav is gone. (I wonder if there&#8217;s a way to make it so Firefox always scrolls down on the site.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Hurtley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noel Hurtley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Needs some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needs some work (as others have pointed out) but I really like the new site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kebb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Kebb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fixed width, little fonts, big rh column issue in Opera, Front page headlines totally unrelated to the latest content.

Really, not a well tested redesign. I am so glad of RSS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed width, little fonts, big rh column issue in Opera, Front page headlines totally unrelated to the latest content.</p>
<p>Really, not a well tested redesign. I am so glad of RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Singe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cameron Singe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks great, I like the use of the earthy colours.

Pat on the back to the designers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great, I like the use of the earthy colours.</p>
<p>Pat on the back to the designers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roberthauk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roberthauk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s contemporary - which I like. Apparently the &quot;light&quot; appearance is catching up on the interwebs. So you are amongst the first to set a trend which I believe will dominate the next 1-2 years. Congratulations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s contemporary &#8211; which I like. Apparently the &#8220;light&#8221; appearance is catching up on the interwebs. So you are amongst the first to set a trend which I believe will dominate the next 1-2 years. Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thunk Different.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thunk Different.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While GigaOm is much improved, I can&#039;t say the same for WWD. I like the old communist grindstone look, now its... biege.

Anyway, content is king!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While GigaOm is much improved, I can&#8217;t say the same for WWD. I like the old communist grindstone look, now its&#8230; biege.</p>
<p>Anyway, content is king!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amie Gillingham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amie Gillingham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it looks fantastic!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Zelenka</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Zelenka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comments and feedback, everyone. Fortunately, our RSS feed has full articles now so you don&#039;t have feel assaulted by beige ;)

While the black may appeal to a certain set, for some (for me!) it felt claustrophobic and depressing. It wasn&#039;t welcoming or kind. It may have been a turnoff for some people we&#039;d like to reach with our message about how the web changes work.

Also, while web working is revolutionary for many people, for others the web just offers a way of improving on already-good working situations. Most knowledge workers aren&#039;t exploited (some are outright coddled with cushy benefits and high salaries) but can still benefit from web ways of working.

Still, I can see why people would resonate with that imaging/branding. Revolutionary change is cool, and we&#039;re still in favor of that when warranted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments and feedback, everyone. Fortunately, our RSS feed has full articles now so you don&#8217;t have feel assaulted by beige ;)</p>
<p>While the black may appeal to a certain set, for some (for me!) it felt claustrophobic and depressing. It wasn&#8217;t welcoming or kind. It may have been a turnoff for some people we&#8217;d like to reach with our message about how the web changes work.</p>
<p>Also, while web working is revolutionary for many people, for others the web just offers a way of improving on already-good working situations. Most knowledge workers aren&#8217;t exploited (some are outright coddled with cushy benefits and high salaries) but can still benefit from web ways of working.</p>
<p>Still, I can see why people would resonate with that imaging/branding. Revolutionary change is cool, and we&#8217;re still in favor of that when warranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Sweet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Sweet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/11/23/unveiling-web-worker-dailys-new-look/#comment-66056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or you can use pageflakes or bloglines and read the blogs the way YOU want to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you can use pageflakes or bloglines and read the blogs the way YOU want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

