<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Email Signature: From Efficient to Overkill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jDeppen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-281929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jDeppen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-281929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a tip I read, I don&#039;t know about misspelling a few words though.


#4: Type &quot;Sent from iPhone&quot; under your short responses.  People don&#039;t expect long responses when you&#039;re on your phone. Don&#039;t forget to mispell a few words.

This all looks graet +1!!
Sent from iPhone.


http://kevinrose.com/blogg/2010/8/17/email-sucks-5-time-saving-tips.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a tip I read, I don&#8217;t know about misspelling a few words though.</p>
<p>#4: Type &#8220;Sent from iPhone&#8221; under your short responses.  People don&#8217;t expect long responses when you&#8217;re on your phone. Don&#8217;t forget to mispell a few words.</p>
<p>This all looks graet +1!!<br />
Sent from iPhone.</p>
<p><a href="http://kevinrose.com/blogg/2010/8/17/email-sucks-5-time-saving-tips.html" rel="nofollow">http://kevinrose.com/blogg/2010/8/17/email-sucks-5-time-saving-tips.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Brown</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice article - but it is worth pointing out that certain information is a legal requirement on UK emails. Every email thread should include : Company name, comapny regestration number, and address of company registration.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use 02JAN10 for the date. That way, I do not confuse my American colleauges ;-) (and this is in fact the standard scientific way of writing the date, and scientists are clever, so it must be right!)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, the American way is not the PROPER way - as long as you speak a derivitive of the Queen&#039;s English, then the Queen&#039;s way is the proper way.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article &#8211; but it is worth pointing out that certain information is a legal requirement on UK emails. Every email thread should include : Company name, comapny regestration number, and address of company registration.</p>
<p>I use 02JAN10 for the date. That way, I do not confuse my American colleauges ;-) (and this is in fact the standard scientific way of writing the date, and scientists are clever, so it must be right!)</p>
<p>Also, the American way is not the PROPER way &#8211; as long as you speak a derivitive of the Queen&#8217;s English, then the Queen&#8217;s way is the proper way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I disagree with leaving out the email.  Sure, it&#039;s a bit redundant, but if you are forwarding the email to another person, it would be helpful to include the email address.  Also, sometimes I copy and paste someone&#039;s contact information into an email to send to someone else so having the email listed is very helpful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My signature includes my name &amp; title, institution, street address, tel/fax and email.  I&#039;ve been lectured before (by outsiders) for not including contact information.  Ugh.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The head of our department standardized the signatures for the people who work under him (I&#039;m not one of those staffers) - I think it&#039;s html-based and is set up like a business card: on the left side is the person&#039;s name, title, phone/fax/email and on the right side is the dept and street address.  He&#039;s kind of particular about stuff like that.  Though I just noticed that a couple of staffers have been using their own (non-standard) signatures - I guess he hasn&#039;t noticed their signatures yet because you can bet he&#039;d badger them to conform.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with leaving out the email.  Sure, it&#8217;s a bit redundant, but if you are forwarding the email to another person, it would be helpful to include the email address.  Also, sometimes I copy and paste someone&#8217;s contact information into an email to send to someone else so having the email listed is very helpful.</p>
<p>My signature includes my name &amp; title, institution, street address, tel/fax and email.  I&#8217;ve been lectured before (by outsiders) for not including contact information.  Ugh.</p>
<p>The head of our department standardized the signatures for the people who work under him (I&#8217;m not one of those staffers) &#8211; I think it&#8217;s html-based and is set up like a business card: on the left side is the person&#8217;s name, title, phone/fax/email and on the right side is the dept and street address.  He&#8217;s kind of particular about stuff like that.  Though I just noticed that a couple of staffers have been using their own (non-standard) signatures &#8211; I guess he hasn&#8217;t noticed their signatures yet because you can bet he&#8217;d badger them to conform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Facebook, Twitter and company logo icons in email signatures drive me nuts! I work in software support and have to forward most emails I receive into a Jira ticketing system. The graphics just end up piling up on certain tickets as trashy attachments because our ticketing system doesn&#039;t know the diff between a substantive attachment and an icon. &quot;Donate Online!&quot; &quot;Join us on Facebook!&quot; Opt for the links people.
Good article.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook, Twitter and company logo icons in email signatures drive me nuts! I work in software support and have to forward most emails I receive into a Jira ticketing system. The graphics just end up piling up on certain tickets as trashy attachments because our ticketing system doesn&#8217;t know the diff between a substantive attachment and an icon. &#8220;Donate Online!&#8221; &#8220;Join us on Facebook!&#8221; Opt for the links people.<br />
Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t want people knowing when I&#039;m not at my desk. Why would I want my iPhone to rat me out?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want people knowing when I&#8217;m not at my desk. Why would I want my iPhone to rat me out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I guess that the international standard has changed as the number of computers has increased since I left school.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that the international standard has changed as the number of computers has increased since I left school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @alphalim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@alphalim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;My email signature consists of one line:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://google.alphalim.me/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a forwarding link to a google search on my name, which turns up all that the searcher might want to know.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My email signature consists of one line:</p>
<p><a href="http://google.alphalim.me/" rel="nofollow">http://google.alphalim.me/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a forwarding link to a google search on my name, which turns up all that the searcher might want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Slinger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Slinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&quot;yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,Cs is the computer language international standard for computer systems. The (human) International standard is dd/mm/yyyy or dd/mm/yy&quot; - really?  According to whom?  It certainly isn&#039;t the &quot;international standard&quot; in the USA, Canada, or large parts of Europe.  Nor is it the &quot;international standard&quot; in the handful of multinational corporations I&#039;ve worked at.  It &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; the &quot;international standard&quot; for the UK (I&#039;m English) and former territories, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google &quot;international date standard&quot; - you get what I posted.  Now google some variation of &quot;international date standard for humans&quot;...  First hit I get is the ISO standard again, and nothing to contradict it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you&#039;d made it, I&#039;d have accepted the argument that the need for a computerized date standard drove/accelerated the definition and sharing of an international date standard, but you don&#039;t get to just arbitrarily claim &quot;dd/mm/yyyy&quot; as an international standard - it isn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,Cs is the computer language international standard for computer systems. The (human) International standard is dd/mm/yyyy or dd/mm/yy&#8221; &#8211; really?  According to whom?  It certainly isn&#8217;t the &#8220;international standard&#8221; in the USA, Canada, or large parts of Europe.  Nor is it the &#8220;international standard&#8221; in the handful of multinational corporations I&#8217;ve worked at.  It <em>is</em> the &#8220;international standard&#8221; for the UK (I&#8217;m English) and former territories, etc.</p>
<p>Google &#8220;international date standard&#8221; &#8211; you get what I posted.  Now google some variation of &#8220;international date standard for humans&#8221;&#8230;  First hit I get is the ISO standard again, and nothing to contradict it.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d made it, I&#8217;d have accepted the argument that the need for a computerized date standard drove/accelerated the definition and sharing of an international date standard, but you don&#8217;t get to just arbitrarily claim &#8220;dd/mm/yyyy&#8221; as an international standard &#8211; it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I hope you can read my last message as all linefeeds where removed.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,Cs should be yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,ms (ms=milliseconds)
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also some languages (eg. Javascript) use 0 to 11 for months, so January=0&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you can read my last message as all linefeeds where removed.
</p>
<p>yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,Cs should be yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,ms (ms=milliseconds)
</p>
<p>Also some languages (eg. Javascript) use 0 to 11 for months, so January=0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,Cs is the computer language international standard for computer systems.
The (human) International standard is dd/mm/yyyy or dd/mm/yy&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not all computer languages use it thou.
Eg. PHP mktime() uses h,m,s, month,day,two digit year.
mktime(HH,MM,SS,MM,DD,YY*,dst&lt;strong&gt;)
YY* = 1970 to 2069
dst&lt;/strong&gt; = true if summer time.
So the date is in the middle of the time as the command ends with the &#039;Daylight Saving Time&#039; value.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yyyy,mm,dd,HH,MM,SS,Cs is the computer language international standard for computer systems.<br />
The (human) International standard is dd/mm/yyyy or dd/mm/yy</p>
<p>Not all computer languages use it thou.<br />
Eg. PHP mktime() uses h,m,s, month,day,two digit year.<br />
mktime(HH,MM,SS,MM,DD,YY*,dst<strong>)<br />
YY* = 1970 to 2069<br />
dst</strong> = true if summer time.<br />
So the date is in the middle of the time as the command ends with the &#8216;Daylight Saving Time&#8217; value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binesh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Binesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I would say this article is worth more than two cents. Thanks for the article..&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say this article is worth more than two cents. Thanks for the article..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Trudy! I was just going to chime in a similar comment about the extra stuff at the bottom. I&#039;m a tax attorney and the IRS requires that we add a Circular 230 disclosure to all correspondence, email included, that meets certain criteria. Other industries have similar requirements; you can&#039;t just delete those (even if it looks silly) without potential consequences.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Trudy! I was just going to chime in a similar comment about the extra stuff at the bottom. I&#8217;m a tax attorney and the IRS requires that we add a Circular 230 disclosure to all correspondence, email included, that meets certain criteria. Other industries have similar requirements; you can&#8217;t just delete those (even if it looks silly) without potential consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Slinger</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Slinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Arguing over how to layout dates?  There&#039;s actually an international standard for that, folks:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;yyyy-mm-dd&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguing over how to layout dates?  There&#8217;s actually an international standard for that, folks:</p>
<p>yyyy-mm-dd</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike russo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike russo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;i like my quote of the day (automatically changed every 5 minutes via a cronjob that runs fortune) and if someone doesn&#039;t like, to hell with them.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like my quote of the day (automatically changed every 5 minutes via a cronjob that runs fortune) and if someone doesn&#8217;t like, to hell with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Agree wholeheartedly.  Email address is an essential and very useful component of a sig.  You never know what email client the recipient is using, or to where your message will be forwarded.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree wholeheartedly.  Email address is an essential and very useful component of a sig.  You never know what email client the recipient is using, or to where your message will be forwarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/the-email-signature-from-efficient-to-disgusting-and-everywhere-in-between/#comment-260138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=35893#comment-260138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I first worked for an international company back in 1982. I&#039;ve used the month name rather number ever since.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That way you can use your preferred order - 19 June 2010 or June 19, 2010 - without creating any ambiguity for a recipient from another part of the organisation who prefers a different order.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This also works well if you need to put the message text into a translator.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first worked for an international company back in 1982. I&#8217;ve used the month name rather number ever since.</p>
<p>That way you can use your preferred order &#8211; 19 June 2010 or June 19, 2010 &#8211; without creating any ambiguity for a recipient from another part of the organisation who prefers a different order.</p>
<p>This also works well if you need to put the message text into a translator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

