<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GigaOM &#187; Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/tag/powerset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='gigaom.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://gigaom.com/osd.xml" title="GigaOM" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://gigaom.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Bing&#039;s Not Too Shabby for Natural Language Searches</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CNN Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locations & Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SYN Feature Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=14319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately, many people have been experimenting with Bing, Microsoft&#8217;s new search engine offering, which we covered here. I agree with the many people who are noting improvements that need to arrive in Bing, such as blog searching and more varied search results for basic keywords. However, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&amp;blog=14960843&amp;post=14319&amp;subd=gigaom2&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img  src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2439/3630597308_1443415af4_o.jpg" alt="" width="141" height="65" class=" alignleft" /></p>
<p>Lately, many people have been experimenting with <a href="http://www.bing.com/">Bing</a>, Microsoft&#8217;s new search engine offering, <a href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/bing-how-useful-is-microsofts-new-search-offering/">which we covered here</a>. I agree with the many people who are noting improvements that need to arrive in Bing, such as blog searching and more varied search results for basic keywords. However, not everyone realizes that Bing is built on a powerful search engine technology from an open source-focused company that Microsoft acquired last year: <a href="http://powerset.com/">Powerset</a>. As I covered <a href="http://ostatic.com/blog/powerset-leveraging-open-source-hadoop-powers-microsofts-bing">in this post</a>, the Powerset technology underlying Bing introduces some powerful features that many people aren&#8217;t trying. You may find them useful.</p>
<p><span id="more-14319"></span></p>
<p>Powerset originally got noticed in the search community because it leveraged <a href="http://ostatic.com/hadoop ">Hadoop</a>, which is an open-source software framework that allows clusters of computers to make very quick work of mining large data sets. (Hadoop also powers Yahoo&#8217;s search engine.) Powerset&#8217;s idea was to leverage Hadoop to improve natural language searching, where you type in questions in sentence form instead of using keywords. If you&#8217;ve followed natural language searching,  you&#8217;ll know that it&#8217;s had a rocky, and generally unsuccessful, history.</p>
<p>Hadoop brought Powerset more speed at mining through the mountains of possibly relevant search returns that come back in natural language search engines. Powerset doesn&#8217;t underlie all of Bing, but this unique facility with natural language searching is in Bing, and you may find it useful if you haven&#8217;t tried it.</p>
<p>Here are some example queries to try at Bing.com, to get a sense for how it works:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=Which+companies+has+Google+acquired%3F&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;filt=all">Which companies has Google acquired?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=Which+Firefox+extensions+block+online+ads%3F&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;filt=all">Which Firefox extensions block online ads?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=What+is+the+semantic+web%3F&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;filt=all">What is the semantic web?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=How+much+was+MySQL+acquired+for%3F&amp;go=&amp;form=QBRE&amp;filt=all">How much was MySQL acquired for?</a></li>
</ul>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice that many of the search results that come back in these types of searches at Bing are mined from Wikipedia, because Powerset has always specialized in Wikipedia search. Entries on Wikipedia aren&#8217;t always correct, so you have to take results with a grain of salt, but Microsoft has extended Bing&#8217;s facility with natural language search beyond just Wikipedia searches, and it can be quite good at providing quick answers to natural language questions.</p>
<p><em>What do you think of Bing&#8217;s natural language search capabilities?</em></p>
<p><strong>Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:</strong><br />Subscriber content. <a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/?utm_source=collaboration&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=14319+bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches&utm_content=samueldean">Sign up for a free trial</a>.</p><ul><li><a href="http://pro.gigaom.com/2010/07/report-nosql-databases-providing-extreme-scale-and-flexibility/?utm_source=collaboration&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=14319+bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches&utm_content=samueldean">Report: NoSQL Databases &#8211; Providing Extreme Scale and&nbsp;Flexibility</a></li><li><a href="?utm_source=collaboration&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=14319+bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches&utm_content=samueldean"></a></li><li><a href="?utm_source=collaboration&utm_medium=editorial&utm_campaign=auto3&utm_term=14319+bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches&utm_content=samueldean"></a></li></ul><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=gigaom.com&amp;blog=14960843&amp;post=14319&amp;subd=gigaom2&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/bing-not-too-shabby-at-natural-language-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/11349124029abca4f099d16c7f6c8472?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">samueldean</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2439/3630597308_1443415af4_o.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
