<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks Ditching T-Mobile, Adopting AT&amp;T for Hotspots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive Starbucks Starts Wi-Fi Debates, Breakfast Battles Heat Up &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive Starbucks Starts Wi-Fi Debates, Breakfast Battles Heat Up &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 15th, 2008 (8:57am) Jason Harris No Comments All the news this week about Starbucks changing wi-fi service providers and offering anyone with a Starbucks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 15th, 2008 (8:57am) Jason Harris No Comments All the news this week about Starbucks changing wi-fi service providers and offering anyone with a Starbucks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunch Time Links for 2-14-08 &#124; Smart Pastor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lunch Time Links for 2-14-08 &#124; Smart Pastor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Starbucks is going to start providing free (well, there is a small catch) wireless internet service. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Starbucks is going to start providing free (well, there is a small catch) wireless internet service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool. Now ATT can violate the federal wiretapping laws and report to the  government anything you do from Starbucks, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Now ATT can violate the federal wiretapping laws and report to the  government anything you do from Starbucks, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermaine M</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jermaine M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when I was looking at dropping AT&amp;T DSL this news comes out. Guess AT&amp;T will keep me as a DSL customer after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I was looking at dropping AT&amp;T DSL this news comes out. Guess AT&amp;T will keep me as a DSL customer after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coldhitz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coldhitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just moved and my new neighborehood is only serviced by AT&amp;T. They did not tell me I would only be able to have the basic speed as my fastest speed option. am with T-mobil and pretty happy , but this new deal with Starbucks has me looking at making a change with my T-Mobile contract coming up to expire. If AT&amp;T wireless will start offering a better airtime for the money deal , I would switch  , so that I coud bundle my services , and save some sweet coin. Good article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just moved and my new neighborehood is only serviced by AT&amp;T. They did not tell me I would only be able to have the basic speed as my fastest speed option. am with T-mobil and pretty happy , but this new deal with Starbucks has me looking at making a change with my T-Mobile contract coming up to expire. If AT&amp;T wireless will start offering a better airtime for the money deal , I would switch  , so that I coud bundle my services , and save some sweet coin. Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm.  But what about the poor shmucks who aren&#039;t T-Mobile customers, but signed that yearly contract for $29.99 a month to access HotSpot services.  What happens to them?  Will T-Mobile still expect them to pay $29.99 per month for a service that AT&amp;T is offering (ostensibly) for free?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  But what about the poor shmucks who aren&#8217;t T-Mobile customers, but signed that yearly contract for $29.99 a month to access HotSpot services.  What happens to them?  Will T-Mobile still expect them to pay $29.99 per month for a service that AT&amp;T is offering (ostensibly) for free?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starbucks Wifi Shakeup &#124; TheJobBored</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starbucks Wifi Shakeup &#124; TheJobBored]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] h/t WebWorkerDaily  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] h/t WebWorkerDaily  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kalsey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Kalsey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T&#039;s wifi is only free for their business class DSL customers at the top tiers of service. If you&#039;re a residential subscriber or use the entry-level business packages, you can add unlimited wifi for $2 per month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s wifi is only free for their business class DSL customers at the top tiers of service. If you&#8217;re a residential subscriber or use the entry-level business packages, you can add unlimited wifi for $2 per month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68564</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T? Sounds like this might be related to Starbucks partnerships with Apple. Free wifi for iphone/itouch users coming soon?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T? Sounds like this might be related to Starbucks partnerships with Apple. Free wifi for iphone/itouch users coming soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Kevin..thanks for commenting.  I never said in my post that T-Mobile users were out in the cold, I just stated that Starbucks has switched to AT&amp;T for their wi-fi hotspot service provider.

However, to avoid confusion, I added an update to the post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin..thanks for commenting.  I never said in my post that T-Mobile users were out in the cold, I just stated that Starbucks has switched to AT&amp;T for their wi-fi hotspot service provider.</p>
<p>However, to avoid confusion, I added an update to the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason, they didn&#039;t ditch T-Mo, they&#039;re still keeping that service for T-Mo customers with a special arrangement between T-Mo and AT&amp;T.: http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, they didn&#8217;t ditch T-Mo, they&#8217;re still keeping that service for T-Mo customers with a special arrangement between T-Mo and AT&amp;T.: <a href="http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826" rel="nofollow">http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/pressdesc.asp?id=826</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starbucks Breaks Up with T-Mobile, Hooks up with AT&#38;T - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/starbucks-ditching-t-mobile-adopting-att-for-hotspots/#comment-68561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starbucks Breaks Up with T-Mobile, Hooks up with AT&#38;T - GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=1745#comment-68561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] going to work, or are you going to get shafted. I would be mighty mad if my plan stops working. Continue Reading @ WebWorkerDaily     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going to work, or are you going to get shafted. I would be mighty mad if my plan stops working. Continue Reading @ WebWorkerDaily     Share/Send  Sphere  Print  Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

