<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shuffling the Deck at WWD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:36:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen Hughes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carmen Hughes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wanted to wish Mike Gunderloy all the best in his new endeavor!  We enjoyed his posts at WWD and will miss reading them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanted to wish Mike Gunderloy all the best in his new endeavor!  We enjoyed his posts at WWD and will miss reading them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gunderloy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Gunderloy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Om.

John, if you want to continue following me in my wanderings, http://afreshcup.com is a good bet for now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Om.</p>
<p>John, if you want to continue following me in my wanderings, <a href="http://afreshcup.com" rel="nofollow">http://afreshcup.com</a> is a good bet for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill spain</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bill spain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judi:

As a reader of WWD via the daily email, I don&#039;t get a feel for who&#039;s writing each article.  I like the service as a whole and read the email every day, but when I read a post that says &quot;I something or other...&quot;, I picture the generic editor of the email.

You should include the names of writers of each post into the email version of your publication to help readers gain a sense of who&#039;s writing what.

Good luck with your new role.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judi:</p>
<p>As a reader of WWD via the daily email, I don&#8217;t get a feel for who&#8217;s writing each article.  I like the service as a whole and read the email every day, but when I read a post that says &#8220;I something or other&#8230;&#8221;, I picture the generic editor of the email.</p>
<p>You should include the names of writers of each post into the email version of your publication to help readers gain a sense of who&#8217;s writing what.</p>
<p>Good luck with your new role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Virginia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing against the other most excellent writers, but I actually subscribed to WWD because of your occasional byline, Judi, so I&#039;m happy that we will be seeing more of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing against the other most excellent writers, but I actually subscribed to WWD because of your occasional byline, Judi, so I&#8217;m happy that we will be seeing more of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Mickiewicz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Mickiewicz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats on the new job Simon! (runs to subscribe to the RSS feed)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the new job Simon! (runs to subscribe to the RSS feed)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had noticed a dearth of new posts from Mike and wondered if something was up. Sorry to see you go. Again. I wandered in to WWD when Mike&#039;s Daily Grind blog ended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had noticed a dearth of new posts from Mike and wondered if something was up. Sorry to see you go. Again. I wandered in to WWD when Mike&#8217;s Daily Grind blog ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judi

Thanks for all your hard work and guidance through the years and we are thrilled to have you write for us -- more fun to read every morning. I am bummed about Mike, but lets give him a round of applause for he was one of the rocks of the site.

Hey Mike, come back and write for us whenever you get done with your development work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judi</p>
<p>Thanks for all your hard work and guidance through the years and we are thrilled to have you write for us &#8212; more fun to read every morning. I am bummed about Mike, but lets give him a round of applause for he was one of the rocks of the site.</p>
<p>Hey Mike, come back and write for us whenever you get done with your development work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/shuffling-the-deck-at-wwd/#comment-79245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad to have you back in the writer trenches with us Judi, your posts are a big part of what drew me to WWD as a reader, long before I came aboard as a contributor.

Exciting times are ahead for Web Worker Daily - I can&#039;t wait!

SB]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to have you back in the writer trenches with us Judi, your posts are a big part of what drew me to WWD as a reader, long before I came aboard as a contributor.</p>
<p>Exciting times are ahead for Web Worker Daily &#8211; I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p>SB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

