<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reinvigorate Tracks Web Site Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-266311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-266311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reinvigorate has just recently introduced heat map tracking and today it (reinvig.) is out of Beta... If you can&#039;t make money with the heatmap track - vs. G&#039;s wanting overlay - then that&#039;s a shame.

As the prior poster said Re-invigorate rocks... (it&#039;s .net too rather than .com - just in case you&#039;re curious)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reinvigorate has just recently introduced heat map tracking and today it (reinvig.) is out of Beta&#8230; If you can&#8217;t make money with the heatmap track &#8211; vs. G&#8217;s wanting overlay &#8211; then that&#8217;s a shame.</p>
<p>As the prior poster said Re-invigorate rocks&#8230; (it&#8217;s .net too rather than .com &#8211; just in case you&#8217;re curious)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leech</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 23:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reinvigorate is great. I&#039;m using it 3 months ago and it rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reinvigorate is great. I&#8217;m using it 3 months ago and it rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@physio

I&#039;ve noticed inaccuracies in Google Analytics as well with two separate sites. At work (large corporation) there is a significant difference between our server logs and what Analytics says. And on my blog there is a difference between WordPress statistics, Analytics, and server logs.

In general my experience has been that the server logs provide the largest numbers which may be a side effect of users disabling javascript or somehow not downloading the urchin.js file. It&#039;s caused me to use Google Analytics as one of many reference points and as representative &lt;i&gt;sample&lt;/i&gt; of what&#039;s happening on my sites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@physio</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed inaccuracies in Google Analytics as well with two separate sites. At work (large corporation) there is a significant difference between our server logs and what Analytics says. And on my blog there is a difference between WordPress statistics, Analytics, and server logs.</p>
<p>In general my experience has been that the server logs provide the largest numbers which may be a side effect of users disabling javascript or somehow not downloading the urchin.js file. It&#8217;s caused me to use Google Analytics as one of many reference points and as representative <i>sample</i> of what&#8217;s happening on my sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-05-29 : Faith and Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2007-05-29 : Faith and Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 07:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Reinvigorate Tracks Web Site Traffic (Web Worker Daily) A new set of analytical tools initially aimed at the blogging market but suitable for any web site. (tags: analytics) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reinvigorate Tracks Web Site Traffic (Web Worker Daily) A new set of analytical tools initially aimed at the blogging market but suitable for any web site. (tags: analytics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: physio</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[physio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 00:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using Google Analytics from the get go but I find it very unreliable. For some of my sites its numbers are way off from my server logs. I can&#039;t trust it anymore. Is this a symptom that may occur on any javascript based traffic stats app? Has anyone here experienced the same inconsistent behavior?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Google Analytics from the get go but I find it very unreliable. For some of my sites its numbers are way off from my server logs. I can&#8217;t trust it anymore. Is this a symptom that may occur on any javascript based traffic stats app? Has anyone here experienced the same inconsistent behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: syed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[syed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 08:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using it and like it direct &amp; no fuzz interface. Another one worth using is &lt;a href=&quot;http://performancing.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;performancing pmetrics&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using it and like it direct &amp; no fuzz interface. Another one worth using is <a href="http://performancing.com" rel="nofollow">performancing pmetrics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Demchenko</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia Demchenko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use both. Just didn&#039;t remove Google Analytics after implementing Reinvigorate. Google Analytics is pretty powerful but Reinvigorate has these nice features as you described (&quot;name-tagging&quot;, paths, etc.) that make it a bit more appealing for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use both. Just didn&#8217;t remove Google Analytics after implementing Reinvigorate. Google Analytics is pretty powerful but Reinvigorate has these nice features as you described (&#8220;name-tagging&#8221;, paths, etc.) that make it a bit more appealing for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PXLated]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Used Reinvigorate years ago (it was free) and then it just disappeared. Looks like it&#039;s been rebirthed with a lot of new features.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used Reinvigorate years ago (it was free) and then it just disappeared. Looks like it&#8217;s been rebirthed with a lot of new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacShout</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacShout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks interesting, but I went to the site, looks like they are still in beta, and not currently accepting sign ups. I submitted my email to be updated when they are accepting. Too bad, they get a great write up like this, and they aren&#039;t going to be able to take advantage of the additional traffic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting, but I went to the site, looks like they are still in beta, and not currently accepting sign ups. I submitted my email to be updated when they are accepting. Too bad, they get a great write up like this, and they aren&#8217;t going to be able to take advantage of the additional traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/05/24/reinvigorate-tracks-web-site-traffic/#comment-59576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be worthwhile to include Mint in any future comparisons: http://haveamint.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be worthwhile to include Mint in any future comparisons: <a href="http://haveamint.com" rel="nofollow">http://haveamint.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

