Comments on: Real Phones Don't Play Music

By: Bakchos

Bakchos — Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:07:05 +0000

Bakchos

I have the same kind of phone and i am really happy with it, i dont need all those bells and whissels

By: music

music — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:01:52 +0000

music

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page…and have to say thanks. nice read.

By: engtech

engtech — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:24:18 +0000

A while back I tore into my nokia 6682 smartphone. http://engtech.wordpress.com/2006/07/30/nokia-6682-review-part-1-of-5-initial-opinion/

The best convergent device is still a Nano + a digital camera + a phone and a big piece of duct-tape to tie them all together.

My model is over a year old now, but I don’t know what’s so smart about a Symbian OS that causes UI slowdowns to the point where you lose 1-2 seconds waiting for screen refreshes.

Looking forward to your guide. :)

By: Rick

Rick — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:12:33 +0000

My spin on the “less is more” philosophy reflects Paul’s comment wrt having easy modes to engage and access. My professional experience with GUIs for pilots slammed that home, whereby pilots recurringly get “lost in the machine” and ponder “what is it doing now ?”. A simple minimalist GUI mode has now become a near requirement in that application.

Closer to the computer/comm device arena is how I really only use 3 services on my blackberry (cell, email, internet) and toward keeping the critical email service bulletproof, I strip it down as much as possible. But I’ll take the option to occasionally play the token blackberry BrickBreaker game or tempt fate with fashionable blackberry email server options.

By: PanMan

PanMan — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:15:14 +0000

I currently have the SE W810. And I find that i use the music player less than I expected, but use the FM radio much more. So, Yes, I do like music in my phone.
I also use it to check internet stuff (the new Gmail applet is great, as is Opera mini), and it does take decent pictures. And it isn’t even considered a ‘smart’phone!
For my next phone I would like to have WiFi, and a SIP client, but those currently seem to be limited to bulky windows mobile things.

By: BJ Clark

BJ Clark — Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:29:45 +0000

Anne: It didn’t rub me the wrong way, it’s just a silly comment. Don’t you think that the original iMac could fall under a “Less is better” category? And that came out in what, like 1997? Like, waaaay before the blogosphere ever had crushes on 37signals? In fact, couldn’t you say that 37Signals applied Apple’s “Less is better” mentality to software?

By: Yuvamani

Yuvamani — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:19:42 +0000

Less is better. When someone tries to do more .. they have generally produced crap …

As far as smartphones go .. the palm os needs to move to linux like yesterday … Symbian smartphone os’s arent exactly glitch free and windows mobile .. Now u need to be masochistic to use it.

The only good smalrtphone out there are RIM’s products and guess what, they were meant for one purpose only: email.

I think the music only iphone makes sense. A great proportion of people who just want to listen to music and would not want to carry both a cellphone and an ipod. Another advantage of an music only phone, You do not need a data plan to enjoy its benefits … That appeals to a far wider market of people.

And I agree with Paul watson.. Just making a java app on top of ur os aint cutting it think rokr. The walkman phone may be great and all, But the elements that apple can bring to this space (think beautiful industrial design, user friendly os, great integration) blows such a device to a new level …

By: Anne Zelenka

Anne Zelenka — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:24:56 +0000

@The Daniel, I took that line out… I must be very frugal when it comes to music! I don’t have anywhere near that much. How much space does your music library take up?

By: Dale Cruse

Dale Cruse — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:07:31 +0000

There’s a rumor that Apple will combine a phone, an iPod, and a portable XM Satellite Radio receiver into one unit. That might be just a wild guess, but if they did I would buy one in a heartbeat.

By: the daniel

the daniel — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:19:51 +0000

“and it includes 4GB of flash memory, enough to store almost anyone’s music library.”

Hmm, ‘music library’ implies ‘all the music they own’ – in which case 4GB isn’t enough to store the music library of anyone I know. Definitely enough to store enough music to last a good long while, but most folks I know have libraries much larger than 4GB.