<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Wi-Fi Reception? Blame Baby Monitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WWD&#8217;s 2009 in Review, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-82700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WWD&#8217;s 2009 in Review, Part 1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-82700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] gear news, the Verizon MiFi 3G router went on sale, while I pointed to a report that blamed poor Wi-Fi performance on baby monitors. I reviewed new &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221; Wolfram Alpha, while Sam tried out [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gear news, the Verizon MiFi 3G router went on sale, while I pointed to a report that blamed poor Wi-Fi performance on baby monitors. I reviewed new &#8220;computational knowledge engine&#8221; Wolfram Alpha, while Sam tried out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwayne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-82699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dwayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-82699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha, nice pic...straight out of my flickr photostream :)

I have a baby monitor (and a few in neighboring houses) and a few wireless phones and my WiFi is pretty solid.  Using a D-Link DIR-655 router FWIW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, nice pic&#8230;straight out of my flickr photostream :)</p>
<p>I have a baby monitor (and a few in neighboring houses) and a few wireless phones and my WiFi is pretty solid.  Using a D-Link DIR-655 router FWIW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-82698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-82698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found that the Wii internet kills my wireless, so I disbaled this function on the Wii - problem solved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that the Wii internet kills my wireless, so I disbaled this function on the Wii &#8211; problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poor Wi-Fi Reception? Blame Baby Monitors — cafedave.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/poor-wi-fi-reception-blame-baby-monitors/#comment-82697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poor Wi-Fi Reception? Blame Baby Monitors — cafedave.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=12887#comment-82697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Could your wifi be having trouble because of your baby monitor? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could your wifi be having trouble because of your baby monitor? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

