Comments on: LiquidPlanner: Sophisticated Online Project Management

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:00:35 +0000

Wrike was a real letdown for us. No API, and no substantive plans to implement one (no, email doesn’t count!). The reports are text-only, not really useful from a metrics standpoint, the time tracking was unintuitive and underdeveloped, the system appears to be getting updated sluggishly, it doesn’t really do any serious prediction — to me, it’s a glorified email connected time tracker with gant support.

I’ve been using LP and Jira’s Greenhopper for different projects, and in all honesty, LP has been easy to work with. Jira remains better in cases where you have a P/T or < PM — it's desperately awesome for Agile and standups when Greenhopper is plugged in — and great for larger teams. But for the 90% of other projects that don't need an intergalactic space shuttle, LP has been great.

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:49:42 +0000

Yeah, it does seem slaggish. I like Wrike much better.

By: Melinda

Melinda — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:25:12 +0000

@ Carrie

I’d be interested to hear more about your experience to help inform our development efforts during our beta. Please feel free to send us feedback using the in-product feedback button. Thanks!

By: Carrie

Carrie — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:50:39 +0000

I just gave this service a quick run-through. It is very sluggish. $24.95/mo/member also sounds really expensive.