<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less is Less</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahil P.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sahil P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 09:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Later reply here but something worth mentioning as our small company goes through this exact same issue. Simple should be ease of use. Get people to start using the software and then as they use it more start showing them powerful features that they can use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Be like a BMW M5 - looks like a sedan but very powerful under the hood. :-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Later reply here but something worth mentioning as our small company goes through this exact same issue. Simple should be ease of use. Get people to start using the software and then as they use it more start showing them powerful features that they can use.</p>
<p>Be like a BMW M5 &#8211; looks like a sedan but very powerful under the hood. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Gallagher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t stand software that tries to do too much. The usual suspects are of course the Adobe CS Suite and MS Office.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But more than this, I really hate it when developers don&#039;t take the time to really craft the experience of the application. There are lots of applications that look pretty, but really fall down when you want to perform what you&#039;d think would be a pretty straightforward task.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d like to see much more thought going into usability Red Routes - really important tasks the user needs to perform - and making these so effortless that the software just disappears. One app that does this wonderfully well is The Hit List.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a wonderful post.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stand software that tries to do too much. The usual suspects are of course the Adobe CS Suite and MS Office.</p>
<p>But more than this, I really hate it when developers don&#8217;t take the time to really craft the experience of the application. There are lots of applications that look pretty, but really fall down when you want to perform what you&#8217;d think would be a pretty straightforward task.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see much more thought going into usability Red Routes &#8211; really important tasks the user needs to perform &#8211; and making these so effortless that the software just disappears. One app that does this wonderfully well is The Hit List.</p>
<p>Thanks for a wonderful post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pensiveharsh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pensiveharsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Recently I have been contemplating a lot on this, even wrote a little bit on my blog. I feel developers ought to segment the users based on their needs. There is a always a larger user base that you are targeting and then there are those with additional needs whom you wouldn&#039;t want to ignore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Build a solution that caters to the target users&#039; needs primarily and build add-ons/ plug-ins for the users who want more features.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This has been practically deployed by Apple in their App store and by Wordpress in their plugin system, both of which are immensely popular among their user base.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I have been contemplating a lot on this, even wrote a little bit on my blog. I feel developers ought to segment the users based on their needs. There is a always a larger user base that you are targeting and then there are those with additional needs whom you wouldn&#8217;t want to ignore.</p>
<p>Build a solution that caters to the target users&#8217; needs primarily and build add-ons/ plug-ins for the users who want more features.</p>
<p>This has been practically deployed by Apple in their App store and by WordPress in their plugin system, both of which are immensely popular among their user base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi W</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heidi W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Scott, I am in favor of software doing more...but I want to do less to run that software...plus I know that I only learn what is most essential for me to get the job done...and sometimes those great productivity features are just too buried...unless someone else gives me a pointer...so simplicity does not necessily = simple...I always liked simpler is better...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott, I am in favor of software doing more&#8230;but I want to do less to run that software&#8230;plus I know that I only learn what is most essential for me to get the job done&#8230;and sometimes those great productivity features are just too buried&#8230;unless someone else gives me a pointer&#8230;so simplicity does not necessily = simple&#8230;I always liked simpler is better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;An excellent point getting back to defining the audience. Absolutely, introducing overhead to accommodate every use case or level of user isn&#039;t the answer to this - but being mindful of it as a developer, and as a user is critical.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks
sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent point getting back to defining the audience. Absolutely, introducing overhead to accommodate every use case or level of user isn&#8217;t the answer to this &#8211; but being mindful of it as a developer, and as a user is critical.</p>
<p>thanks<br />
sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;David,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s the rub then isn&#039;t it. Not overwhelming folks upon first visit but providing them what they need contextually.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is the danger of hiding the more advanced features as well. I routinely look at new apps and can easily dismiss something if it doesn&#039;t appear to be customizable enough to handle a more complex workflow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks,
sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the rub then isn&#8217;t it. Not overwhelming folks upon first visit but providing them what they need contextually.</p>
<p>There is the danger of hiding the more advanced features as well. I routinely look at new apps and can easily dismiss something if it doesn&#8217;t appear to be customizable enough to handle a more complex workflow.</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yes, excellent point. In this context, the same things seen as the complexities of OmniFocus are actually making it easier to use for some folks. That really does speak for the concept of creating an application for a specific audience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks for the comment,
sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, excellent point. In this context, the same things seen as the complexities of OmniFocus are actually making it easier to use for some folks. That really does speak for the concept of creating an application for a specific audience.</p>
<p>thanks for the comment,<br />
sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Gmail is a great example. The interface is complex, but not overwhelmingly so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With that said though, I have worked with a number of people that have trouble with the threaded conversation view and are generally confused by the presentation. Which email am I responding to?  If I reply to this can they see the whole thread?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The feeling of less but offering more. I really like the sound of that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gmail is a great example. The interface is complex, but not overwhelmingly so.</p>
<p>With that said though, I have worked with a number of people that have trouble with the threaded conversation view and are generally confused by the presentation. Which email am I responding to?  If I reply to this can they see the whole thread?</p>
<p>The feeling of less but offering more. I really like the sound of that.</p>
<p>sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Jason,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Exactly - the integrations are critical. I&#039;m amazed at some of the horribly complex Rube Goldberg inspired processes people use to get data from one place to the other.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m also big fan of The Small Business Web and what they are working towards. I hope that they continue to build upon the integrations that they have put in place - it&#039;s a great first step but there is still a ways to go.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks
sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>Exactly &#8211; the integrations are critical. I&#8217;m amazed at some of the horribly complex Rube Goldberg inspired processes people use to get data from one place to the other.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also big fan of The Small Business Web and what they are working towards. I hope that they continue to build upon the integrations that they have put in place &#8211; it&#8217;s a great first step but there is still a ways to go.</p>
<p>thanks<br />
sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Absolutely Bill. As a user / evaluator how do you insure that you are choosing not only an application that your people can use but one that also fills the needs of your business?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks
sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely Bill. As a user / evaluator how do you insure that you are choosing not only an application that your people can use but one that also fills the needs of your business?</p>
<p>thanks<br />
sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s been a few years since I&#039;ve used it but I think GIMP is a great example - although I think it can ironically be used to present the argument either way. The GIMP interface is a bit radical at first glance and I find that it does initially turn a lot of people away. Most who do take the time to master it though will rave about the quality of the program.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a few years since I&#8217;ve used it but I think GIMP is a great example &#8211; although I think it can ironically be used to present the argument either way. The GIMP interface is a bit radical at first glance and I find that it does initially turn a lot of people away. Most who do take the time to master it though will rave about the quality of the program.</p>
<p>sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the links Gregg.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Certainly it is important to define and acknowledge your audience and present accordingly, having it also discount the intuitiveness and tenacity of your users isn&#039;t the right way to do it. I don&#039;t envy those who have to find that balance.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;sb&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Gregg.</p>
<p>Certainly it is important to define and acknowledge your audience and present accordingly, having it also discount the intuitiveness and tenacity of your users isn&#8217;t the right way to do it. I don&#8217;t envy those who have to find that balance.</p>
<p>sb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Blitstein</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Blitstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It does come back to the definition of simple. Ultimately though, my fear is that the goal of simple as easy forces us to accept simple as limited.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does come back to the definition of simple. Ultimately though, my fear is that the goal of simple as easy forces us to accept simple as limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priyanka D</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priyanka D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I enjoyed reading this article! I think it might be about how &#039;techie&#039; the people using the tool are? Less would be easier for many people to use. While I agree there are always those that appreciate the finer nuances of technology :)
So it might be for the tool vendors to decide which market they are targeting.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading this article! I think it might be about how &#8216;techie&#8217; the people using the tool are? Less would be easier for many people to use. While I agree there are always those that appreciate the finer nuances of technology :)<br />
So it might be for the tool vendors to decide which market they are targeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for February 7 2010</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links for February 7 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Less is Less by Scott Blitstein on WebWorkerDaily [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Less is Less by Scott Blitstein on WebWorkerDaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kraljic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/less-is-less/#comment-92070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Kraljic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=27785#comment-92070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;User adoption - in my experience - falls dramatically the more feature rich the tool is. I have seen this happen time and time again. Interface - is also a huge part of the tools chance of success. If the interface takes into account workflow and present user with the correct feaures at the correct time then you have a winner.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have gone through Salesforce, Batchbook, Basecamp, Huddle, JIRA, TRacs, etc, etc, And most recently Attask. It almost always comes down to - can an average business user do the basics quickly. If not - they loose interest and will most certainly never find use for the more complex features.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>User adoption &#8211; in my experience &#8211; falls dramatically the more feature rich the tool is. I have seen this happen time and time again. Interface &#8211; is also a huge part of the tools chance of success. If the interface takes into account workflow and present user with the correct feaures at the correct time then you have a winner.</p>
<p>I have gone through Salesforce, Batchbook, Basecamp, Huddle, JIRA, TRacs, etc, etc, And most recently Attask. It almost always comes down to &#8211; can an average business user do the basics quickly. If not &#8211; they loose interest and will most certainly never find use for the more complex features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

