<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jungle Disk Goes Workgroup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/jungle-disk-goes-workgroup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/jungle-disk-goes-workgroup/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/jungle-disk-goes-workgroup/#comment-75260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=3322#comment-75260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems like it would be the perfect solution except it is missing one important part if it plans to be a workgroup product. It lacks the ability to control versioning. I have a mobile workforce and sometimes 2 users will modify the same document and then try to sync with each other. In other products like groove both copies are retained but the user&#039;s name is appended to the end of the document.

I need a workgroup solution that deals with the versioning issue and is cross platform and I have yet to find a good solution. If jungledisk added this sort of control I would be very happy with their product.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like it would be the perfect solution except it is missing one important part if it plans to be a workgroup product. It lacks the ability to control versioning. I have a mobile workforce and sometimes 2 users will modify the same document and then try to sync with each other. In other products like groove both copies are retained but the user&#8217;s name is appended to the end of the document.</p>
<p>I need a workgroup solution that deals with the versioning issue and is cross platform and I have yet to find a good solution. If jungledisk added this sort of control I would be very happy with their product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl Fortnum</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/jungle-disk-goes-workgroup/#comment-75259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carl Fortnum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.wordpress.com/?p=3322#comment-75259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do use Jungle on my Mac because let&#039;s face it, it&#039;s pretty easy to use. However I&#039;m currently beta testing SMEStorage.com&#039;s OpenS3 beta. This allows me to use my S3 keys with their platform which means I can then access my files in a slick Ajax UI, and share my files on Facebook, oh and access them on my Iphone - very slick the Iphone app is as wel It&#039;s a good combination with Jungle I feel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do use Jungle on my Mac because let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s pretty easy to use. However I&#8217;m currently beta testing SMEStorage.com&#8217;s OpenS3 beta. This allows me to use my S3 keys with their platform which means I can then access my files in a slick Ajax UI, and share my files on Facebook, oh and access them on my Iphone &#8211; very slick the Iphone app is as wel It&#8217;s a good combination with Jungle I feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

