<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joint Contact Inserts Social Media Into Web-Based Project Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tarium</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-275536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Tarium]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-275536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I&#039;m looking to invest in mobile app stocks and smartphone stocks. Can you provide any suggestions? So far I have SWKS, ARMH, MIMV, ZAGG, RFMD and NVDA from this list: http://www.wikinvest.com/wiki/Mobile_app_stocks but I need need additional positions. If there are any ETF&#039;s with a focus on mobile that would be great too. Thanks - Phil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m looking to invest in mobile app stocks and smartphone stocks. Can you provide any suggestions? So far I have SWKS, ARMH, MIMV, ZAGG, RFMD and NVDA from this list: <a href="http://www.wikinvest.com/wiki/Mobile_app_stocks" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikinvest.com/wiki/Mobile_app_stocks</a> but I need need additional positions. If there are any ETF&#8217;s with a focus on mobile that would be great too. Thanks &#8211; Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Granted. But if you wanted to exploit network externalities, i.e. scale up the user base of a particular app as quickly as possible, it would make more sense to apply the charges on some other variable. This way, more users sign up for free, but they would then have to pay fees if they want more projects, or more storage, or no ads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted. But if you wanted to exploit network externalities, i.e. scale up the user base of a particular app as quickly as possible, it would make more sense to apply the charges on some other variable. This way, more users sign up for free, but they would then have to pay fees if they want more projects, or more storage, or no ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mackie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variable costs have very little to do with what these apps charge I would think. Storage and bandwidth costs are very low. I think the per user fee makes sense to most customers (it&#039;s what they&#039;re used to paying on the desktop) so it&#039;s a good way of charging an incremental fee that rises with usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Variable costs have very little to do with what these apps charge I would think. Storage and bandwidth costs are very low. I think the per user fee makes sense to most customers (it&#8217;s what they&#8217;re used to paying on the desktop) so it&#8217;s a good way of charging an incremental fee that rises with usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone explain to me why some of the collaboration and project management apps (like Joint Contact) have a pricing scale that is dependent on the number of users? I may be wrong, but intuitively I would think that the number of users does not add to cost and that the more variable cost items would be the number of projects/workspaces opened and amount of file storage used. Yet it is these last two that are often made unlimited at the next higher subscription level. Also, to tap into network externalities, the SaaS providers would scale up user numbers faster if they uncoupled their subscription rates from the number of users. I am just missing something in this picture?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain to me why some of the collaboration and project management apps (like Joint Contact) have a pricing scale that is dependent on the number of users? I may be wrong, but intuitively I would think that the number of users does not add to cost and that the more variable cost items would be the number of projects/workspaces opened and amount of file storage used. Yet it is these last two that are often made unlimited at the next higher subscription level. Also, to tap into network externalities, the SaaS providers would scale up user numbers faster if they uncoupled their subscription rates from the number of users. I am just missing something in this picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Work 101: 10 Apps You Can’t Do Without &#171; mensonblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Work 101: 10 Apps You Can’t Do Without &#171; mensonblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Joint Contact [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joint Contact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Web Work 101: 10 Apps You Can&#8217;t Do Without &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Web Work 101: 10 Apps You Can&#8217;t Do Without &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Joint Contact [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joint Contact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive How Twitter is a Communications Game Changer &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive How Twitter is a Communications Game Changer &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I began reviewing project management tools for WWD, I was taken by Joint Contact&#8217;s integration of Twitter into their featureset. Suddenly, Twitter was a feature add-on for applications where communications [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I began reviewing project management tools for WWD, I was taken by Joint Contact&#8217;s integration of Twitter into their featureset. Suddenly, Twitter was a feature add-on for applications where communications [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Twitter With Your Favorite Productivity Web Apps &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive Twitter With Your Favorite Productivity Web Apps &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Contact - Aliza shared her thoughts about Joint Contact and their Twitter integration back in July. It seems like such a logical [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Contact &#8211; Aliza shared her thoughts about Joint Contact and their Twitter integration back in July. It seems like such a logical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive A Second Look at Evernote, Joint Contact, Backboard, Retaggr and Zemanta &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WebWorkerDaily &#187; Archive A Second Look at Evernote, Joint Contact, Backboard, Retaggr and Zemanta &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my constant quest for the ideal project management tool for Web work, I took a look at Joint Contact last month, especially taken with their ideas around using Twitter as part of project management. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my constant quest for the ideal project management tool for Web work, I took a look at Joint Contact last month, especially taken with their ideas around using Twitter as part of project management. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Your Status? &#171; Joint Contact Official Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What&#8217;s Your Status? &#171; Joint Contact Official Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] folks at WebWorkerDaily had a chance to catch up with us and we had a great discussion about project collaboration and role [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] folks at WebWorkerDaily had a chance to catch up with us and we had a great discussion about project collaboration and role [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Email integration is a nice feature, especially for those who want to stay out of their inbox as much as possible. Email can be such a productivity killer, but integrating it into a web-based project management service helps keep the distractive inbox at bay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email integration is a nice feature, especially for those who want to stay out of their inbox as much as possible. Email can be such a productivity killer, but integrating it into a web-based project management service helps keep the distractive inbox at bay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice McLane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alice McLane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harshil,
Thank you for noticing that Wrike was the first to introduce email integration. We&#039;re soon releasing another very important project management feature - an option to add task dependencies. This one will be released with our brand new Enterprise version.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harshil,<br />
Thank you for noticing that Wrike was the first to introduce email integration. We&#8217;re soon releasing another very important project management feature &#8211; an option to add task dependencies. This one will be released with our brand new Enterprise version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renita Lovell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Renita Lovell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent analysis of the tools. Thank you for sharing.

Renita Lovell]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis of the tools. Thank you for sharing.</p>
<p>Renita Lovell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahil Parikh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sahil Parikh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Aliza,
Thanks for your candid comments. Would love to know what is so confusing or non-intuitive about DeskAway so we could improve upon it if its a genuine change.

Cheers!
Sahil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aliza,<br />
Thanks for your candid comments. Would love to know what is so confusing or non-intuitive about DeskAway so we could improve upon it if its a genuine change.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Sahil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harshil Karia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harshil Karia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to add - for Joint Contact - the pricing is bordering on ridiculously expensive - my company has just started and in a short span we have accumulated about 30 free lance copywriters to work with us, there&#039;s a design team, and a few coders. So the number overall goes to about 35 employees. And mine is a &#039;small business&#039;. If you compare pricing for DA and Joint Contact then you would notice that there is a start difference. As i stated earlier - i dont think the twitter integration solves a real world problem - its a fancy. So having seen that - and seen other features on Joint Contract, its a little overpriced. So a company like mine which is services based and works with about 10 - 15 clients a month, the professional plan at about $250 a year works well for me (i could do with a personal plan as well) - its project based pricing which i think also helps streamline things beause really - which company (small) works on &#039;unlimited projects&#039; - if it does - that company is bound to die soon. If i used Joint Contact - at a team of about 35, it works out to $960 a year. Would you pay more than triple the price for just Twitter integration? I would not.

I do appreciate the interface being developed by Joint Contact - quite like the look and feel of the site but i just think its being a little too overhyped and its not exactly perfect for the end user - it maybe great for internet geeks who want to philander some money but my take is that for the average joe or raj or abdul :) - it doesn&#039;t really solve too many problems. It may in fact complicate them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add &#8211; for Joint Contact &#8211; the pricing is bordering on ridiculously expensive &#8211; my company has just started and in a short span we have accumulated about 30 free lance copywriters to work with us, there&#8217;s a design team, and a few coders. So the number overall goes to about 35 employees. And mine is a &#8216;small business&#8217;. If you compare pricing for DA and Joint Contact then you would notice that there is a start difference. As i stated earlier &#8211; i dont think the twitter integration solves a real world problem &#8211; its a fancy. So having seen that &#8211; and seen other features on Joint Contract, its a little overpriced. So a company like mine which is services based and works with about 10 &#8211; 15 clients a month, the professional plan at about $250 a year works well for me (i could do with a personal plan as well) &#8211; its project based pricing which i think also helps streamline things beause really &#8211; which company (small) works on &#8216;unlimited projects&#8217; &#8211; if it does &#8211; that company is bound to die soon. If i used Joint Contact &#8211; at a team of about 35, it works out to $960 a year. Would you pay more than triple the price for just Twitter integration? I would not.</p>
<p>I do appreciate the interface being developed by Joint Contact &#8211; quite like the look and feel of the site but i just think its being a little too overhyped and its not exactly perfect for the end user &#8211; it maybe great for internet geeks who want to philander some money but my take is that for the average joe or raj or abdul :) &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t really solve too many problems. It may in fact complicate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harshil Karia</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/joint-contact-inserts-social-media-into-web-based-project-management/#comment-73504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harshil Karia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=2704#comment-73504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just upgraded to Deskaway&#039;s Professional Account - i dont see any problems with interface. Infact it&#039;s quite clear and clutter free. Probably a matter of perspective. DA just added the ability to replicate tasks - i think email integration is on its way as well. Basecamp did the same following Wrike i think. Using Social Media tools for Project Management is great. Taking a cue from another DA user - iv started using Google Apps for chat and then alligned that with DA (chat is something thats missing in DA and the rest). While i think the Twitter idea is great - its more style than substance. As is see it - email is still the center of the social media pie - no matter what &#039;experts&#039; may claim. I honestly dont see the Twitter integration solving a new problem.

At the core of PM as long as you have a dashboard, a tracking, reporting and analytics tool, an ability to control a few processes, and outreach to stakeholder through 1 mainstream medium - all this fanciful stuff doesn&#039;t really matter in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded to Deskaway&#8217;s Professional Account &#8211; i dont see any problems with interface. Infact it&#8217;s quite clear and clutter free. Probably a matter of perspective. DA just added the ability to replicate tasks &#8211; i think email integration is on its way as well. Basecamp did the same following Wrike i think. Using Social Media tools for Project Management is great. Taking a cue from another DA user &#8211; iv started using Google Apps for chat and then alligned that with DA (chat is something thats missing in DA and the rest). While i think the Twitter idea is great &#8211; its more style than substance. As is see it &#8211; email is still the center of the social media pie &#8211; no matter what &#8216;experts&#8217; may claim. I honestly dont see the Twitter integration solving a new problem.</p>
<p>At the core of PM as long as you have a dashboard, a tracking, reporting and analytics tool, an ability to control a few processes, and outreach to stakeholder through 1 mainstream medium &#8211; all this fanciful stuff doesn&#8217;t really matter in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

