<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Social So Over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m conducting a job search for the first time since 2005 and I was surprised at how many postings required Social Media skills!  It&#039;s one thing to spend time on Facebook all day but to successfully roll out social media in the professional setting is something else altogether.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m conducting a job search for the first time since 2005 and I was surprised at how many postings required Social Media skills!  It&#8217;s one thing to spend time on Facebook all day but to successfully roll out social media in the professional setting is something else altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Social So Over? &#171; Social Media Mama</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Social So Over? &#171; Social Media Mama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read more of my post over on Web Worker Daily&#8217;s site. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more of my post over on Web Worker Daily&#8217;s site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert S. Robbins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert S. Robbins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not over until the fat lady sings and posts a video on YouTube where haters tell her she is fat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not over until the fat lady sings and posts a video on YouTube where haters tell her she is fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rakesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U r damn right, it was a fad getting over now.

Rakesh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U r damn right, it was a fad getting over now.</p>
<p>Rakesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aliza Sherman - &#8220;Is Social So Over?&#8221; &#171; Eclectic Buzz Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aliza Sherman - &#8220;Is Social So Over?&#8221; &#171; Eclectic Buzz Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/11/is-social-so-over/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/11/is-social-so-over/" rel="nofollow">http://webworkerdaily.com/2008/12/11/is-social-so-over/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Conrey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Conrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also worked with a company in 1999 that thought it would be awesome to use 2000 in their domain name.

Using the term Social in a company name definitely dates your business and limits your ability to diversify, but I don&#039;t think social media is over. I think there are millions of people and thousands of business that haven&#039;t even scratched the surface of social media.

If this other people think social is over, let them get out of the way so I can capitalize on their absence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also worked with a company in 1999 that thought it would be awesome to use 2000 in their domain name.</p>
<p>Using the term Social in a company name definitely dates your business and limits your ability to diversify, but I don&#8217;t think social media is over. I think there are millions of people and thousands of business that haven&#8217;t even scratched the surface of social media.</p>
<p>If this other people think social is over, let them get out of the way so I can capitalize on their absence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I at least hope out loud that the phrase &quot;Join the conversation&quot; is over?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I at least hope out loud that the phrase &#8220;Join the conversation&#8221; is over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sscheper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sscheper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may also want to check out yonkly. It&#039;s the first microblog that integrates with twitter: http://yonkly.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may also want to check out yonkly. It&#8217;s the first microblog that integrates with twitter: <a href="http://yonkly.com" rel="nofollow">http://yonkly.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Kane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve noticed we humans tire of words quickly and to demonstrate, here is your question, &quot;Is Social So Over?&quot; I think not.

Web evolution is causing us to evolve and invent language - to create shortcuts to describe sometimes nebulous concepts. Nebulous like computing in the &quot;Cloud&quot; one might say. :-)

There&#039;s a reason why Eskimos have over 30 words to describe snow. Snow is more important and ever changing in their world - as the web is in ours. They&#039;re probably not so much tired of the word, but have found it not specific enough for many purposes.

A nice short useful word like &quot;social&quot; will be with us for a very long time, I&#039;m guessing. But like Eskimos, we won&#039;t just be satisfied just to know there&#039;s snow outside - we&#039;ll want to know the color, texture, granularity, depth and more - or that the site is a dating site - or a social cause site - or a targeted community site like &quot;a long haul trucker load board community site&quot;.

Yeah, social&#039;s a bit worn, but here to stay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed we humans tire of words quickly and to demonstrate, here is your question, &#8220;Is Social So Over?&#8221; I think not.</p>
<p>Web evolution is causing us to evolve and invent language &#8211; to create shortcuts to describe sometimes nebulous concepts. Nebulous like computing in the &#8220;Cloud&#8221; one might say. :-)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why Eskimos have over 30 words to describe snow. Snow is more important and ever changing in their world &#8211; as the web is in ours. They&#8217;re probably not so much tired of the word, but have found it not specific enough for many purposes.</p>
<p>A nice short useful word like &#8220;social&#8221; will be with us for a very long time, I&#8217;m guessing. But like Eskimos, we won&#8217;t just be satisfied just to know there&#8217;s snow outside &#8211; we&#8217;ll want to know the color, texture, granularity, depth and more &#8211; or that the site is a dating site &#8211; or a social cause site &#8211; or a targeted community site like &#8220;a long haul trucker load board community site&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yeah, social&#8217;s a bit worn, but here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Turner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/is-social-so-over/#comment-78197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=5612#comment-78197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say that &quot;social&quot; is over as a marketing term, or a buzzword, or likely as a company name, but that&#039;s largely due to two causes: overhyping of the concept, and the fact that its use is standard and mainstream (well, business mainstream anyway), that it&#039;s just not a distinguishing feature anymore.

Social is the web standard (and always has been really), so it doesn&#039;t need to be the hype centre anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that &#8220;social&#8221; is over as a marketing term, or a buzzword, or likely as a company name, but that&#8217;s largely due to two causes: overhyping of the concept, and the fact that its use is standard and mainstream (well, business mainstream anyway), that it&#8217;s just not a distinguishing feature anymore.</p>
<p>Social is the web standard (and always has been really), so it doesn&#8217;t need to be the hype centre anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

