<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tips to prepare yourself for Bust 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Top Broker online</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Top Broker online]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 08:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Business Cash Advance</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Business Cash Advance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Everything About Money</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Everything About Money]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYSiteWorks.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Valuating a Web 2.0 startup</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NYSiteWorks.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Valuating a Web 2.0 startup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie&#8217;s Tips - Valuating a Web 2.0 startup</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie&#8217;s Tips - Valuating a Web 2.0 startup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive Open Thread: Paying for Web 2.0 &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Worker Daily &#187; Archive Open Thread: Paying for Web 2.0 &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to &#8220;get enough Google ads on enough pages and our troubles are over.&#8221; Despite our worries about Bust 2.0, there doesn&#8217;t seem any end in sight to the proliferation of free services. But sooner or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to &#8220;get enough Google ads on enough pages and our troubles are over.&#8221; Despite our worries about Bust 2.0, there doesn&#8217;t seem any end in sight to the proliferation of free services. But sooner or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Best Stock Offers</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Valuating a Web 2.0 startup &#124; Best Stock Offers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Graphic and comments Courtesy eSnips, Business 2.0, techwag, and web worker daily). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Job Hunting Expenses</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Job Hunting Expenses]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to see someone is staying on top of things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see someone is staying on top of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 笨笨包的天空 &#187; 什麼是網站的『價值』？</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[笨笨包的天空 &#187; 什麼是網站的『價值』？]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Web Worker Daily 以及 Blogs.business2.com 發表了一篇很有意思的文章 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web Worker Daily 以及 Blogs.business2.com 發表了一篇很有意思的文章 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the &#8220;value&#8221; of that startup? &#124; TechWag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What is the &#8220;value&#8221; of that startup? &#124; TechWag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Web Worker Daily and Blogs.business2.com have a really fascinating article on the valuation of Web 2.0 Startups. Looks like the CEO of E-Snips was poking around alexa to determine how some of the more recognizable web 2.0 startups were doing in their traffic counts, and then offset that by how much some of the companies had been bough for. Business 2 states: So how much is a Web 2.0 startup really worth? Everyone is wondering that these days, especially since there are so few acquisitions or IPOs by which to measure them. That&#8217;s why I like the slide below created by eSnips CEO Yael Elish. It gives an approximate value for many high-profile Web 2.0 sites by correlating publicly available Alexa Web traffic numbers with the value of known deals like YouTube&#8217;s. This slide is hardly accurate for many reasons (see below), but it does help you visualize how one company may be doing against another. Source Business 2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web Worker Daily and Blogs.business2.com have a really fascinating article on the valuation of Web 2.0 Startups. Looks like the CEO of E-Snips was poking around alexa to determine how some of the more recognizable web 2.0 startups were doing in their traffic counts, and then offset that by how much some of the companies had been bough for. Business 2 states: So how much is a Web 2.0 startup really worth? Everyone is wondering that these days, especially since there are so few acquisitions or IPOs by which to measure them. That&#8217;s why I like the slide below created by eSnips CEO Yael Elish. It gives an approximate value for many high-profile Web 2.0 sites by correlating publicly available Alexa Web traffic numbers with the value of known deals like YouTube&#8217;s. This slide is hardly accurate for many reasons (see below), but it does help you visualize how one company may be doing against another. Source Business 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Audrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Steve: What do you mean by real world value? Obviously it&#039;s important in the long run that your product or service brings in revenue, but there&#039;s a huge range of things people are willing to pay for (either directly, or indirectly through viewing advertising).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve: What do you mean by real world value? Obviously it&#8217;s important in the long run that your product or service brings in revenue, but there&#8217;s a huge range of things people are willing to pay for (either directly, or indirectly through viewing advertising).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cook</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about having a business model that is based on real world profit rather than the latest Wow! idea?

During the last downturn the company I worked for struggled, but managed to keep its head above water thanks to a business model that was based on real world value (despite still being a web-based company).

Of course the downside of that sort of thing is that it can be less sexy and have less chance of making one a multi-billionaire than jumping onboard the latest bandwagon. But then one has to balance that against the risks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about having a business model that is based on real world profit rather than the latest Wow! idea?</p>
<p>During the last downturn the company I worked for struggled, but managed to keep its head above water thanks to a business model that was based on real world value (despite still being a web-based company).</p>
<p>Of course the downside of that sort of thing is that it can be less sexy and have less chance of making one a multi-billionaire than jumping onboard the latest bandwagon. But then one has to balance that against the risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Siry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Siry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, Mike. Considering that offline companies are firing people for no other reason than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070329/BUSINESS01/703290361/1066&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they earn too much&lt;/a&gt;, this is good advice for &lt;b&gt;anyone&lt;/b&gt;, not just software developers working for buzzword startups.

I&#039;d further advise everyone nowadays to keep maintain a &#039;layoff emergency kit,&#039; analogous to an earthquake kit, in case of unforeseen joblessness. Spend four hours a month updating your resume, brushing up your online portfolio, attending free conferences in your city where you can do some networking, etc. When you see recruiters posting jobs in a field similar to yours, note their name &amp; email for future reference. Think of it as an ongoing, low level job search, where you do everything but actually send out your resume (unless you actually &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; looking for a job, like Dave C.).

If you do suddenly find yourself with a lot of time on your hands, that&#039;s the time to get busy. I&#039;m actually surprised by the number of otherwise incredibly capable people who don&#039;t know the first thing about the dynamics of looking for a job in the networked world- mainly because they&#039;ve been heads down in a company for the past five years and it&#039;s been the furthest thing from their mind. I recently posted a list of &lt;a href=&quot;http://marcsiry.blogspot.com/2007/03/finding-gigs-helpful-guide-for-recently.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tips for the recently jobless&lt;/a&gt; which cover seemingly obvious steps like setting up RSS feeds for job boards.

Expansions and contractions in the business cycle are inevitable, because thought leaders move and followers follow. One or two high profile collapses will make the followers nervous and they&#039;ll start to pull their support from ventures that are underperforming (most of them) and you&#039;ll see a ripple effect of collapses. Is that a bust, or is it the natural weeding of companies that shouldn&#039;t have survived in the first place? Easy to say the latter until &lt;b&gt;you&#039;re&lt;/b&gt; the one getting your walking papers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Mike. Considering that offline companies are firing people for no other reason than <a href="http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070329/BUSINESS01/703290361/1066" rel="nofollow">they earn too much</a>, this is good advice for <b>anyone</b>, not just software developers working for buzzword startups.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d further advise everyone nowadays to keep maintain a &#8216;layoff emergency kit,&#8217; analogous to an earthquake kit, in case of unforeseen joblessness. Spend four hours a month updating your resume, brushing up your online portfolio, attending free conferences in your city where you can do some networking, etc. When you see recruiters posting jobs in a field similar to yours, note their name &amp; email for future reference. Think of it as an ongoing, low level job search, where you do everything but actually send out your resume (unless you actually <b>are</b> looking for a job, like Dave C.).</p>
<p>If you do suddenly find yourself with a lot of time on your hands, that&#8217;s the time to get busy. I&#8217;m actually surprised by the number of otherwise incredibly capable people who don&#8217;t know the first thing about the dynamics of looking for a job in the networked world- mainly because they&#8217;ve been heads down in a company for the past five years and it&#8217;s been the furthest thing from their mind. I recently posted a list of <a href="http://marcsiry.blogspot.com/2007/03/finding-gigs-helpful-guide-for-recently.html" rel="nofollow">tips for the recently jobless</a> which cover seemingly obvious steps like setting up RSS feeds for job boards.</p>
<p>Expansions and contractions in the business cycle are inevitable, because thought leaders move and followers follow. One or two high profile collapses will make the followers nervous and they&#8217;ll start to pull their support from ventures that are underperforming (most of them) and you&#8217;ll see a ripple effect of collapses. Is that a bust, or is it the natural weeding of companies that shouldn&#8217;t have survived in the first place? Easy to say the latter until <b>you&#8217;re</b> the one getting your walking papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanjeev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amanjeev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. I was too young during the time of first dot com burst and fear the same this time. Can anyone tell what is the difference this time?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I was too young during the time of first dot com burst and fear the same this time. Can anyone tell what is the difference this time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webified</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[webified]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, what I learnt from the first dot com boom and bust is that you should get in and earn the bucks, then quickly exit and go back to grunt work after the bust. In other words, ride the wave then go back to plodding.

I&#039;m a bit of an idealist. In the dot com boom 1.0, I was in the dot com. When it went bust, I stayed in the dot com by ganging up with a few fellas to do web consulting. It was rough. I think my monthly allowance was like $300 a month! Luckily, my salary is a little more decent now.

However with web 2.0 emerging, jobs for interactive people or new media junkies are a plenty and I could make earning 10X more than I do now. The smart thing to do is get a job, ride the wave, earn the bucks, network with a ton more of people, save up money, wait for the hype to die, go back to my own business? ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, what I learnt from the first dot com boom and bust is that you should get in and earn the bucks, then quickly exit and go back to grunt work after the bust. In other words, ride the wave then go back to plodding.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit of an idealist. In the dot com boom 1.0, I was in the dot com. When it went bust, I stayed in the dot com by ganging up with a few fellas to do web consulting. It was rough. I think my monthly allowance was like $300 a month! Luckily, my salary is a little more decent now.</p>
<p>However with web 2.0 emerging, jobs for interactive people or new media junkies are a plenty and I could make earning 10X more than I do now. The smart thing to do is get a job, ride the wave, earn the bucks, network with a ton more of people, save up money, wait for the hype to die, go back to my own business? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socialorb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[socialorb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/04/02/irrational-exuberance-strikes-again/#comment-57286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I argee with most of what you say. There is a possibility though that page views do count for allow ESPECIALLY if your a marketer. That many views is prime for analysis. I personally believe that Google bought YouTube to study video closer, turn the site slowely to a super site for internet TV, and advertising... but as a advertisor it wants to know how people respond to and act on the site, what they click, when they click it, where they come from.

That is some prime data on trends and patterns that no one else has except MySpace right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argee with most of what you say. There is a possibility though that page views do count for allow ESPECIALLY if your a marketer. That many views is prime for analysis. I personally believe that Google bought YouTube to study video closer, turn the site slowely to a super site for internet TV, and advertising&#8230; but as a advertisor it wants to know how people respond to and act on the site, what they click, when they click it, where they come from.</p>
<p>That is some prime data on trends and patterns that no one else has except MySpace right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

