<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyoun Park</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hyoun Park]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed.  My own research in video conferencing in August showed that SMBs were getting value that rivaled enterprises on an ROI-based basis because of their increased adoption of PC-based video throughout the enterprise and B-2-B based solutions.

Collaboration is based on empowering end-users, providing work flexibility, and getting to a result more quickly. Everything else is feature bloat and it&#039;s something that a majority of collaboration vendors still don&#039;t seem to get.  It&#039;s not about technical superiority in specific types of display; it&#039;s about providing technologies that actually drive value.  The lack of value-driven analysis is both one of my frustrations as an analyst and an opportunity that I hope to take advantage to provide more transparent metrics of collaborative value over the next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  My own research in video conferencing in August showed that SMBs were getting value that rivaled enterprises on an ROI-based basis because of their increased adoption of PC-based video throughout the enterprise and B-2-B based solutions.</p>
<p>Collaboration is based on empowering end-users, providing work flexibility, and getting to a result more quickly. Everything else is feature bloat and it&#8217;s something that a majority of collaboration vendors still don&#8217;t seem to get.  It&#8217;s not about technical superiority in specific types of display; it&#8217;s about providing technologies that actually drive value.  The lack of value-driven analysis is both one of my frustrations as an analyst and an opportunity that I hope to take advantage to provide more transparent metrics of collaborative value over the next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Malmborg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Malmborg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;is a disruptive tool that unless used in a highly regulated and disciplined environment can and does lead to waste of time and unnecessary and unproductive chit-chat&quot;
What kind of achtung bitte attitude is that?! IM has a number of advantages which is so obvious, to most knowledge workers and people in the UC space, that I&#039;m not going to list them.
I my company I have applied no regulation what so ever regarding the use of IM. We use Skype IM internally and externally... in all kind of situations... from group chats in projects to communication with Chinese manufacturers that are too shy to speak English. For example, yesterday I placed a USD 246 000 order for bathroom accessories after communication and file share conducted only by Skype.
Shim, If you are a Manager that apply these types of communication bondage I think you should rethink you standpoint for the sake of the company you work for. Therapy may help.
&quot;highly regulated and disciplined environment&quot;... my god...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;is a disruptive tool that unless used in a highly regulated and disciplined environment can and does lead to waste of time and unnecessary and unproductive chit-chat&#8221;<br />
What kind of achtung bitte attitude is that?! IM has a number of advantages which is so obvious, to most knowledge workers and people in the UC space, that I&#8217;m not going to list them.<br />
I my company I have applied no regulation what so ever regarding the use of IM. We use Skype IM internally and externally&#8230; in all kind of situations&#8230; from group chats in projects to communication with Chinese manufacturers that are too shy to speak English. For example, yesterday I placed a USD 246 000 order for bathroom accessories after communication and file share conducted only by Skype.<br />
Shim, If you are a Manager that apply these types of communication bondage I think you should rethink you standpoint for the sake of the company you work for. Therapy may help.<br />
&#8220;highly regulated and disciplined environment&#8221;&#8230; my god&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pankaj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SMB section of the study is indeed a little hard to digest, if one compares it with numerous other studies which suggest that SMBs are the main segment leading the adoption of online collaboration tools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SMB section of the study is indeed a little hard to digest, if one compares it with numerous other studies which suggest that SMBs are the main segment leading the adoption of online collaboration tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Links for October 16th through October 22nd &#124; Akkam's Razor</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daily Links for October 16th through October 22nd &#124; Akkam's Razor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says &#8211; While the study shows that companies investing in top-of-the-range telepresence and telephony systems get the most return, even organizations deploying just basic collaborative tools (like IM and web conferencing) reap a return on collaborative investment of over two times. The study suggests this is because teams using collaborative tools can benefit from a network effect &#8212; the more users on a network, the more value is realized from it. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says &#8211; While the study shows that companies investing in top-of-the-range telepresence and telephony systems get the most return, even organizations deploying just basic collaborative tools (like IM and web conferencing) reap a return on collaborative investment of over two times. The study suggests this is because teams using collaborative tools can benefit from a network effect &mdash; the more users on a network, the more value is realized from it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collaborative Technology Increases Productivity and Profit &#124; Lawyerist</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collaborative Technology Increases Productivity and Profit &#124; Lawyerist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says&#124; Web Worker Daily [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says| Web Worker Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shim Marom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shim Marom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised by the inclusion of IM in the same category as the other collaboration tools mentioned in the report. IM, while enabling fast and unstructured communication, is a disruptive tool that unless used in a highly regulated and disciplined environment can and does lead to waste of time and unnecessary and unproductive chit-chat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised by the inclusion of IM in the same category as the other collaboration tools mentioned in the report. IM, while enabling fast and unstructured communication, is a disruptive tool that unless used in a highly regulated and disciplined environment can and does lead to waste of time and unnecessary and unproductive chit-chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great collaborative web conferencing and remote support tool is a 4-in-1 Appliance by RHUB. It&#039;s a hardware that you can deploy behind your firewall for greater protection and it offers web conferencing, remote support, remote access, and webinars. A few features are video broadcasting, ability to record meetings for macs and pcs, white board, annotation, etc.

Take a look at what they offer: http://www.rhubcom.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great collaborative web conferencing and remote support tool is a 4-in-1 Appliance by RHUB. It&#8217;s a hardware that you can deploy behind your firewall for greater protection and it offers web conferencing, remote support, remote access, and webinars. A few features are video broadcasting, ability to record meetings for macs and pcs, white board, annotation, etc.</p>
<p>Take a look at what they offer: <a href="http://www.rhubcom.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rhubcom.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says &#124; Productivity Hacks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Invest in Collaborative Tools, Get More Than Double Return, Study Says &#124; Productivity Hacks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] via Web Worker Daily. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Web Worker Daily. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-10-15 &#124; Yostivanich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2009-10-15 &#124; Yostivanich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Invest in Col­lab­o­ra­tive Tools, Get More Than Dou­ble Return, Study Says “While the study shows that com­pa­nies invest­ing in top-of-the-range telep­res­ence and tele­phony sys­tems get the most return, even orga­ni­za­tions deploy­ing just basic col­lab­o­ra­tive tools (like IM and web con­fer­enc­ing) reap a return on col­lab­o­ra­tive invest­ment of over two times. The study sug­gests this is because teams using col­lab­o­ra­tive tools can ben­e­fit from a net­work effect — the more users on a net­work, the more value is real­ized from it.” My cur­rent work­place needs to use more col­lab­o­ra­tive tools. (tags: busi­ness pro­duc­tiv­ity col­lab­o­ra­tion social­net­work­ing im) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Invest in Col­lab­o­ra­tive Tools, Get More Than Dou­ble Return, Study Says “While the study shows that com­pa­nies invest­ing in top-of-the-range telep­res­ence and tele­phony sys­tems get the most return, even orga­ni­za­tions deploy­ing just basic col­lab­o­ra­tive tools (like IM and web con­fer­enc­ing) reap a return on col­lab­o­ra­tive invest­ment of over two times. The study sug­gests this is because teams using col­lab­o­ra­tive tools can ben­e­fit from a net­work effect — the more users on a net­work, the more value is real­ized from it.” My cur­rent work­place needs to use more col­lab­o­ra­tive tools. (tags: busi­ness pro­duc­tiv­ity col­lab­o­ra­tion social­net­work­ing im) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper Westaway</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/invest-in-collaborative-tools-get-more-than-double-return-study-says/#comment-88358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasper Westaway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/?p=21053#comment-88358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree on the broader message that collaboration is a good thing - I&#039;m a collaboration software vendor after all.  But I dislike the positioning of conferencing as the definition of high end collaboration.

Just because it&#039;s high-end tech, it doesn&#039;t mean it is a high end solution.  The opposite in many ways - we don&#039;t know what good collaboration looks like so we&#039;ll make it look exactly the same as working in the same room!

Successful (and truer) collaboration solutions like Google Docs and Basecamp are generally employed by SMB&#039;s but I doubt they featured much in the survey (hence the poor returns for SMB;s)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree on the broader message that collaboration is a good thing &#8211; I&#8217;m a collaboration software vendor after all.  But I dislike the positioning of conferencing as the definition of high end collaboration.</p>
<p>Just because it&#8217;s high-end tech, it doesn&#8217;t mean it is a high end solution.  The opposite in many ways &#8211; we don&#8217;t know what good collaboration looks like so we&#8217;ll make it look exactly the same as working in the same room!</p>
<p>Successful (and truer) collaboration solutions like Google Docs and Basecamp are generally employed by SMB&#8217;s but I doubt they featured much in the survey (hence the poor returns for SMB;s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

