<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improved Startup Delayer App is Still a Gem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/collaboration/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anelly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/02/23/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to admit that Windows users are indeed used with removing stray applications that make their way into the list of startup processes. And the good part is that is that there are freeware applications that actually works.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that Windows users are indeed used with removing stray applications that make their way into the list of startup processes. And the good part is that is that there are freeware applications that actually works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Mackie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Mackie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/02/23/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@William, yes, but not everyone has a choice :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@William, yes, but not everyone has a choice :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joff</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/02/23/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using Startup Delayer for about a month and it&#039;s fantastic!  Now only the essentials boot on startup with everything else staggered over the next half hour or so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Startup Delayer for about a month and it&#8217;s fantastic!  Now only the essentials boot on startup with everything else staggered over the next half hour or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/collaboration/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/02/23/improved-startup-delayer-app-is-still-a-gem/#comment-80040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An even better solution is MacOS :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An even better solution is MacOS :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

